A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ETcam questions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 8th 04, 10:12 AM
Dan Foster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ETcam questions

I thought I read somewhere that they were going to use cameras on the
stack for at least the next few launches.

Q: Same camera (make/model or type) as used on STS-112?

Q: I'm sure it's an incredibly well engineered piece of hardware; I'm
still curious, though -- I believe there are Crit-1 failure modes
involving the cameras (according to at least one NASA public document).

Such as if for some strange reason, it falls off or some piece breaks
off during ascent. Is it still considered worth the potential risk,
however slight?

(Since it would appear that the debris would likely hit the wings'
leading edge or other sensitive surfaces if it ever fell off.)

Q: Have they (either NASA or the manufacturer, Crosslink) figured out a
solution for the fogging problem seen from SRB SEP on 112?

-Dan
  #2  
Old July 9th 04, 04:27 AM
Mike Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ETcam questions

Dan, I have some information about the proposed cameras. The fogging on
112 was caused by the SRB separation motors, so the placement on the ET can
be changed to help with that. I am not aware of studies being done to
assess risk of the cameras falling off the vehicle and impacting the
orbiter. The foam comes off for several reasons including thermal flexing
and vibration of the ET, but, unlike the foam, the cameras will be bolted
on. The advantage gained by having another source of video of the orbiter
outweighs the risk that the camera (or pieces thereof) may come off.

- Mike Scott, Space Shuttle Flight Design and Dynamics

"Dan Foster" wrote in message
...
I thought I read somewhere that they were going to use cameras on the
stack for at least the next few launches.

Q: Same camera (make/model or type) as used on STS-112?

Q: I'm sure it's an incredibly well engineered piece of hardware; I'm
still curious, though -- I believe there are Crit-1 failure modes
involving the cameras (according to at least one NASA public document).

Such as if for some strange reason, it falls off or some piece breaks
off during ascent. Is it still considered worth the potential risk,
however slight?

(Since it would appear that the debris would likely hit the wings'
leading edge or other sensitive surfaces if it ever fell off.)

Q: Have they (either NASA or the manufacturer, Crosslink) figured out a
solution for the fogging problem seen from SRB SEP on 112?

-Dan



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
questions about the universe... Roger Space Science Misc 5 March 17th 04 05:18 PM
Questions: Landing on mars and dust storms... Richie Space Shuttle 6 February 4th 04 12:32 PM
Buran Questions Justin Wigg Space Shuttle 1 December 31st 03 05:21 AM
MMT: "Any questions on that?" -- SILENCE jeff findley Space Shuttle 10 July 30th 03 09:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.