![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought I read somewhere that they were going to use cameras on the
stack for at least the next few launches. Q: Same camera (make/model or type) as used on STS-112? Q: I'm sure it's an incredibly well engineered piece of hardware; I'm still curious, though -- I believe there are Crit-1 failure modes involving the cameras (according to at least one NASA public document). Such as if for some strange reason, it falls off or some piece breaks off during ascent. Is it still considered worth the potential risk, however slight? (Since it would appear that the debris would likely hit the wings' leading edge or other sensitive surfaces if it ever fell off.) Q: Have they (either NASA or the manufacturer, Crosslink) figured out a solution for the fogging problem seen from SRB SEP on 112? -Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan, I have some information about the proposed cameras. The fogging on
112 was caused by the SRB separation motors, so the placement on the ET can be changed to help with that. I am not aware of studies being done to assess risk of the cameras falling off the vehicle and impacting the orbiter. The foam comes off for several reasons including thermal flexing and vibration of the ET, but, unlike the foam, the cameras will be bolted on. The advantage gained by having another source of video of the orbiter outweighs the risk that the camera (or pieces thereof) may come off. - Mike Scott, Space Shuttle Flight Design and Dynamics "Dan Foster" wrote in message ... I thought I read somewhere that they were going to use cameras on the stack for at least the next few launches. Q: Same camera (make/model or type) as used on STS-112? Q: I'm sure it's an incredibly well engineered piece of hardware; I'm still curious, though -- I believe there are Crit-1 failure modes involving the cameras (according to at least one NASA public document). Such as if for some strange reason, it falls off or some piece breaks off during ascent. Is it still considered worth the potential risk, however slight? (Since it would appear that the debris would likely hit the wings' leading edge or other sensitive surfaces if it ever fell off.) Q: Have they (either NASA or the manufacturer, Crosslink) figured out a solution for the fogging problem seen from SRB SEP on 112? -Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
questions about the universe... | Roger | Space Science Misc | 5 | March 17th 04 05:18 PM |
Questions: Landing on mars and dust storms... | Richie | Space Shuttle | 6 | February 4th 04 12:32 PM |
Buran Questions | Justin Wigg | Space Shuttle | 1 | December 31st 03 05:21 AM |
MMT: "Any questions on that?" -- SILENCE | jeff findley | Space Shuttle | 10 | July 30th 03 09:44 PM |