![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 4, 5:53 am, (Phillip Helbig---
remove CLOTHES to reply) wrote: In article , Knecht writes: Relativity is safe for now and probably will remain so for quite some time, that is, as long as we let observations resolve scientific issues. As the moderator's note in another post in this thread pointed out, relativity would still be safe even without the new issues you mention. The two things (CMB as a "universal reference frame" and how this jibes with relativity on the one hand and the large-scale flows etc on the other) have nothing to do with each other. I would welcome a clear and succinct synopsis of your reasoning for the contention that these two phenomena are unrelated. I am wondering if there might be some disparity in our starting assumptions. Yours in science, Knecht www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conceptual problem | jacob navia[_3_] | Research | 1 | December 9th 08 04:01 PM |
Conceptual Problem II: Absolute Frames | Knecht | Research | 1 | December 4th 08 10:53 AM |
she will comprise conceptual heels, do you flood them | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 14th 07 12:35 PM |
Conceptual audit required | oriel36 | UK Astronomy | 0 | January 2nd 06 01:33 PM |
Conceptual problems | jacob navia | Research | 7 | October 17th 05 02:16 PM |