He murdered 33, but there is a shocking vicious American thing in class "Go back to China, hahaha"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/..._tech_shooting

I can see the story of a guy who doesn't speak and maintains calm
rather than
returning provocations. Everybody laughing at him, while is from Korea
and
serious, and not part of the KKK games of American bullying. In the
US,
kids are provoced to be tough and sombodies.

I was wondering a few days ago why this kind of killings don't happen
in
other countries. It is the loud dumb Americans vs. the silent world of
no racist
haha, no dumb chinese.

They built a stereotype of laughter of him, and I don't think he lived
very
happily, as most in school knew that he is the Chinese guy and
whatever
he did, he got those racist comments of hatred and ridicule. And he
went
to college, and people noticed that he wasn't happy, and a girl said
she
refuses to come to class if he is there.

We are talking about a kid who went on with half-closed eyes
throughout
school, who felt the insults, but could do nothing, as he was serious
and
was not interested in reacting to bullies, and most of these bullies
in the
USA tend to be girls.

So he hated girls and he hated rich kids who he saw as the primary
bullies
in school.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/..._tech_shooting

I can see the story of a guy who doesn't speak and maintains calm
rather than
returning provocations. Everybody laughing at him, while is from Korea
and
serious, and not part of the KKK games of American bullying. In the
US,
kids are provoced to be tough and sombodies.

I was wondering a few days ago why this kind of killings don't happen
in
other countries. It is the loud dumb Americans vs. the silent world of
no racist
haha, no dumb chinese.

They built a stereotype of laughter of him, and I don't think he lived
very
happily, as most in school knew that he is the Chinese guy and
whatever
he did, he got those racist comments of hatred and ridicule. And he
went
to college, and people noticed that he wasn't happy, and a girl said
she
refuses to come to class if he is there.

We are talking about a kid who went on with half-closed eyes
throughout
school, who felt the insults, but could do nothing, as he was serious
and
was not interested in reacting to bullies, and most of these bullies
in the
USA tend to be girls.

So he hated girls and he hated rich kids who he saw as the primary
bullies
in school.

The psychology of 'public enemies' in regimes:

Alienation. Us or them. A regime has ideals, the Russian regime was
very happy to declare public enemies to communism. Those who
didn't work were jailed. Work as in Orwell's factory was mandatory
for all people. There were no rich people or housewife exceptions,
no secret money activities that might offer richness and early
retirement. Those who didn't work were jailed for years and
labeled 'publically endangering work-avoiders'.

So does the USA label 'public enemies', the USA under Bush
pursues terrorists like Jews. And all who do not abide to
a 'law-biding standards' erected through 200 years of racism
in the history of the US government, 400 years, whatever.
(the CIA is watching the American farmer, he knows he won't
violate the law and that he is a good biding citizen).
In Texas there is a 'war on drunk driving' (superfascism),
under the new law nobody is discriminated from being labeled
as a 'publically endangering drunk driver', so as a result
all drunk people are arrested anywhere, inside a bar,
or a homeless on the street for being drunk under the new
'war against drunk driving' initiative.

To label and (in)discriminately arrest those charged of being
a harmful aspect to the society, a regime takes a big government
regime mentality as normal.

It is in the American society to feel a sense of big government
and formulate politics around it. To be American, is often
to be part of an ideal society, one Bush relates to when
he calls his Democracy as a model and he doesn't see that
it is the regime that transforms his being when he allows himself
to speak of a model Arab and a new model Arab country, one
that particularly respects Bush's beliefs that the USA is the
oldest and most modelest form of Democracy. But Bush
doesn't see that many of his actions are (in)discriminative,
regime-like (brain-washingtoned). As (in)discriminative,
Bush sees things alike, and is less culturally motivated,
he is a high racist who values the system and policies over
ordinary Democracy, his party votes 100 percent for war and
are promoting a higher super-power mentality that prefers
to (as the old soviets) dominate using the power available
and not negotiate so to speak over matters of nationalistic
priorities, an importance so to speak, one that doesn't see
that erecting a model Iraq is erecting an Iraqi that is better
than Arabs, a corruption of racism and racist clensing
under a criminally sadist Bush of an idealistic-over-power,
a monster living behind policies and laughing at Democracy
like Google's customer services in terms of humanity. Always
going for the sensitive spot and dominating all people, whoring
all people and accepting no appologies for making insults or
otherwise as a military in 110 countries is not ready to back
away from public interests. A super-manipulation of politics,
and a determined winner that by now walks wearing an
invisible coat and resists change, but there is no other
way. He can't allow himself to speak of a model Arab.
If Israel would have went in to Lebanon, and not left weeks
later it cleaned up the terrorist camps, but would have stayed
like ****ing ass of the block, and Israel would have ****ing
spoke of a model Arab in Lebanon that is the interest of the
regime, Israel would have been charged with racial clensing.
What Bush does is racism and it is not allowed.

Public enemies. Bush sees public enemies. A regime
mentality, one similar to Ceausescu where he saught to
compromize with the secret police rather than turn to
Democracy, a historical corruption of racism in the US
government. Safety cannot be compromized with racism,
that is a corruption. In other countries presidents who conspire
are removed, but a president like Ceausescu who takes no
**** from anyone and uses police as a mentality, would
harshly deal with a man pulling his man-nipples, but
there are places where doing that to a president would
mean nothing out of the ordinary. But it didn't make
sense to pull Ceausescu's nipples. Some places are
determined in undemocratic ways (I used "undemocratic",
they spoke the word "anti-American" openly in public
thousands of times in the US government in the past years),
framing all like 1st Lt. Ehren Watada who when off-duty want
to seek friends and speak their minds against problems in
this world, but was arrested for making contempt toward
other officials (he was later declared a deserter as the
mess 'opened', which now still sits closed. Currently
those making racist republican propaganda in the US
military go unarrested and highly promoted.)

What do I see in regards to a corrupt blindness?

I see Ceausescu's nipples pulled by his secret police
personnel.

Summing it up.

The Virginia Tech killer and Regimes

He murdered 33, but there is a shocking vicious American thing in
class "Go back to China, hahaha"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/..._tech_shooting

I can see the story of a guy who doesn't speak and maintains calm
rather than returning provocations. Everybody laughing at him, while
is from Korea and serious, and not part of the KKK games of American
bullying. In the
US, kids are provoced to be tough and sombodies.

I was wondering a few days ago why this kind of killings don't happen
in other countries. It is the loud dumb Americans vs. the silent world
of no racist haha, no dumb chinese.

They built a stereotype of laughter of him, and I don't think he lived
very happily, as most in school knew that he is the Chinese guy and
whatever he did, he got those racist comments of hatred and ridicule.
And he went to college, and people noticed that he wasn't happy, and a
girl said she refuses to come to class if he is there.

We are talking about a kid who went on with half-closed eyes
throughout school, who felt the insults, but could do nothing, as he
was serious and was not interested in reacting to bullies, and most of
these bullies in the USA tend to be girls.

So he hated girls and he hated rich kids who he saw as the primary
bullies in school.

The psychology of 'public enemies' in regimes:

Alienation. Us or them. A regime has ideals, the Russian regime was
very happy to declare public enemies to communism. Those who didn't
work were jailed. Work as in Orwell's factory was mandatory for all
people. There were no rich people or housewife exceptions, no secret
money activities that might offer richness and early
retirement. Those who didn't work were jailed for years and labeled
'publically endangering work-avoiders'.

So does the USA label 'public enemies', the USA under Bush pursues
terrorists like Jews. And all who do not abide to a 'law-biding
standards' erected through 200 years of racism in the history of the
US government, 400 years, whatever. (the CIA is watching the American
farmer, he knows he won't violate the law and that he is a good biding
citizen). In Texas there is a 'war on drunk driving' (superfascism),
under the new law nobody is discriminated from being labeled as a
'publically endangering drunk driver', so as a result all drunk people
are arrested anywhere, inside a bar, or a homeless on the street for
being drunk under the new 'war against drunk driving' initiative.

To label and (in)discriminately arrest those charged of being a
harmful aspect to the society, a regime takes a big government regime
mentality as normal.

It is in the American society to feel a sense of big government and
formulate politics around it. To be American, is often to be part of
an ideal society, one Bush relates to when he calls his Democracy as a
model and he doesn't see that it is the regime that transforms his
being when he allows himself to speak of a model Arab and a new model
Arab country, one that particularly respects Bush's beliefs that the
USA is the oldest and most modelest form of Democracy. But Bush
doesn't see that many of his actions are (in)discriminative, regime-
like (brain-washingtoned). As (in)discriminative, Bush sees things
alike, and is less culturally motivated, he is a high racist who
values the system and policies over ordinary Democracy, his party
votes 100 percent for war and are promoting a higher super-power
mentality that prefers to (as the old soviets) dominate using the
power available and not negotiate so to speak over matters of
nationalistic priorities, an importance so to speak, one that doesn't
see that erecting a model Iraq is erecting an Iraqi that is better
than Arabs, a corruption of racism and racist clensing under a
criminally sadist Bush of an idealistic-over-power, a monster living
behind policies and laughing at Democracy like Google's customer
services in terms of humanity. Always going for the sensitive spot and
dominating all people, whoring all people and accepting no appologies
for making insults or otherwise as a military in 110 countries is not
ready to back away from public interests. A super-manipulation of
politics, and a determined winner that by now walks wearing an
invisible coat and resists change, but there is no other way. He can't
allow himself to speak of a model Arab. If Israel would have went in
to Lebanon, and not left weeks later it cleaned up the terrorist
camps, but would have stayed like ****ing ass of the block, and Israel
would have ****ing spoke of a model Arab in Lebanon that is the
interest of the regime, Israel would have been charged with racial
clensing. What Bush does is racism and it is not allowed.

Public enemies. Bush sees public enemies. A regime mentality, one
similar to Ceausescu where he saught to compromize with the secret
police rather than turn to Democracy, a historical corruption of
racism in the US government. Safety cannot be compromized with racism,
that is a corruption. In other countries presidents who conspire are
removed, but a president like Ceausescu who takes no **** from anyone
and uses police as a mentality, would harshly deal with a man pulling
his man-nipples, but there are places where doing that to a president
would mean nothing out of the ordinary. But it didn't make sense to
pull Ceausescu's nipples. Some places are determined in undemocratic
ways (I used "undemocratic", they spoke the word "anti-American"
openly in public thousands of times in the US government in the past
years), framing all like 1st Lt. Ehren Watada who when off-duty want
to seek friends and speak their minds against problems in this world,
but was arrested for making contempt toward other officials (he was
later declared a deserter as the mess 'opened', which now still sits
closed. Currently those making racist republican propaganda in the US
military go unarrested and highly promoted.)

What do I see in regards to a corrupt blindness?

I see Ceausescu's nipples in the company of his secret police, though
he had a secretary.

Learn, governer.

Ceausescu loved dictating letters in his office as he was a man of
speaches. One day his female secretary had a cold and did not even
dare to stop typing as Ceausescu dictated his letter. She quickly used
her upper arms. It was a cold way, a place where politicies and
beaurocracy meant everything, and only that, a place where walls were
silent and the secretary was the quickest and most well mannered in
her neet black blouse.