A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Astro Pictures
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ASTRO: NGC 2392



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 13th 07, 03:31 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
Rick Johnson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,085
Default ASTRO: NGC 2392



J McBride wrote:

Well I got tired of M42 so I moved on to this. Its a lot more challenging
shooting through a 26mm ep with a 4064mm F.L. This was taken through a 16"
f/10 SCT and a CP4500 point and shoot @ ASA200, zoomed in about 1/2 way
(optical zoom). Exposure time is about 45 seconds...4 subs that vary in
time. Its a little stretched but ok for the time invested.

Joe


Digital cameras sure have come a long way! Astro CCD makers may soon be
hard pressed by these cameras.

Rick
--
Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct.
Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh".

  #2  
Old March 13th 07, 04:02 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
J McBride
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 274
Default ASTRO: NGC 2392

Well I got tired of M42 so I moved on to this. Its a lot more challenging
shooting through a 26mm ep with a 4064mm F.L. This was taken through a 16"
f/10 SCT and a CP4500 point and shoot @ ASA200, zoomed in about 1/2 way
(optical zoom). Exposure time is about 45 seconds...4 subs that vary in
time. Its a little stretched but ok for the time invested.

Joe





Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ngc2392.jpg
Views:	297
Size:	55.3 KB
ID:	522  
  #3  
Old March 13th 07, 08:33 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
Stefan Lilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,269
Default ASTRO: NGC 2392

Joe,

very good for a "compact camera" picture.

Stefan

"J McBride" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
Well I got tired of M42 so I moved on to this. Its a lot more challenging
shooting through a 26mm ep with a 4064mm F.L. This was taken through a
16"
f/10 SCT and a CP4500 point and shoot @ ASA200, zoomed in about 1/2 way
(optical zoom). Exposure time is about 45 seconds...4 subs that vary in
time. Its a little stretched but ok for the time invested.

Joe





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 May 3rd 06 12:33 PM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] SETI 0 May 3rd 06 12:33 PM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] SETI 0 October 6th 05 02:34 AM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 September 30th 04 02:23 AM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] SETI 0 September 30th 04 02:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.