![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(CNN)
HOUSTON , Texas (AP) -- Former astronaut Neil Armstrong says Americans should support President Bush's plan for renewed missions to the moon and beyond. Armstrong said the plan was economically sustainable and that the country must accept the risks associated with space exploration in order to reap technological rewards. "Our president has introduced a new initiative with renewed emphasis on the exploration of our solar system and expansion of human frontiers," Armstrong told a crowd of nearly 600 people Thursday. "This proposal has substantial merit and promise." He was in Houston to receive the Rotary National Award for Space Achievement. Armstrong, 73, commanded NASA's Apollo 11 mission in 1969, becoming the first person to walk on the moon. In 1971, he left the space program to pursue a teaching career in aeronautical engineering in his native Ohio. Armstrong said the success of the Bush's space plan depends on whether the government, aerospace industry, researchers and others can unite behind it. The Bush White House wants to return to the moon and eventually send astronauts there by 2020, and to Mars -- an effort that would cost hundreds of billions of dollars. Some lawmakers have questioned proposed costs and risks. "Our economy can certainly afford an effort of this magnitude, but the public must believe the benefits to society deserve the investment," Armstrong said in Friday's edition of the Houston Chronicle. "To limit the program in the name of eliminating the risk is no virtue." President Bush has proposed that the space shuttle stop flying in 2010 and that the remaining shuttle flights concentrate on completion of the International Space Station and research. .. . . . . Our "space program" has been literally orbiting around in circles for WAY too long now. Time to DO something with what we've learned. A permanent, expanding, ultimately profitible presence on the moon and beyond is the next step. We were gonna spend the money anyway, so let's spend it on something better than orbiting tomato seeds and token foreign-nationals. The costs will be spread-out over the next 25 years or so. We CAN afford the moon, so long as it's on the installment plan. Of course, I'm sure the libbies will claim Armstrong is getting payola from Halliburton ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lunar base and space manufacturing books for sale | Martin Bayer | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 1st 04 04:57 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Hubble Space Telescope first casualty of Bush space initiative | Tom Abbott | Policy | 10 | January 21st 04 05:20 AM |
Space review: The vision thing | Kaido Kert | Policy | 156 | December 3rd 03 06:30 PM |
NASA's Gateway To Space For Life Science Research Dedicated Today | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 19th 03 10:08 PM |