![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I worked with the Russians in 1993 when NASA was looking into buying a Soyuz
as the station's lifeboat. They told me their goal at the time was permanent manned presence in space at minimum cost. If they got some real science back, great. But to them the Mir itself was a big science experiment. Part of me thinks we should do better -- i.e. explore the solar system and/or do lot of science. The problem is the cost goes WAY up. Part of me thinks permanent manned presence in space for the lowest cost possible might not be a bad goal for NASA. With the current budget situation, this might be as much as NASA can do. It certainly is an objective that is easy to measure. The key is to look at how to get the cost down. As a minimum we would learn a lot about what is needed to go to Mars someday. Danny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 12:00 am, "Danny Deger" wrote:
I worked with the Russians in 1993 when NASA was looking into buying a Soyuz as the station's lifeboat. They told me their goal at the time was permanent manned presence in space at minimum cost. If they got some real science back, great. But to them the Mir itself was a big science experiment. Part of me thinks we should do better -- i.e. explore the solar system and/or do lot of science. The problem is the cost goes WAY up. Part of me thinks permanent manned presence in space for the lowest cost possible might not be a bad goal for NASA. With the current budget situation, this might be as much as NASA can do. It certainly is an objective that is easy to measure. The key is to look at how to get the cost down. As a minimum we would learn a lot about what is needed to go to Mars someday. Danny One might try to keep the station going without resupply for 2 years. That would help perfect what's needed for interplanetary flight without the dangers of being far from home and beyond help. One could also test artificial gravity. A "cheap" reusable launcher (i.e. not the STS) would also be needed for later interplanetary flights. The Russian development of orbital assembly (i.e. MIR) and orbital refueling (i.e. Progress) will be the core technologies of EOR construction of future interplanetary craft. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The End of U.S. Manned Spaceflight? | Joseph S. Powell, III | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 29th 03 07:15 PM |
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight | LooseChanj | History | 6 | July 29th 03 02:19 AM |
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight | OM | History | 1 | July 26th 03 10:15 AM |
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight | Rand Simberg | History | 0 | July 26th 03 05:12 AM |
"The End of Manned Spaceflight Looms Ever Closer" | jeff findley | Policy | 5 | July 13th 03 10:13 PM |