A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Russian Manned Spaceflight Goal



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 07, 06:00 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Danny Deger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Russian Manned Spaceflight Goal

I worked with the Russians in 1993 when NASA was looking into buying a Soyuz
as the station's lifeboat. They told me their goal at the time was
permanent manned presence in space at minimum cost. If they got some real
science back, great. But to them the Mir itself was a big science
experiment.

Part of me thinks we should do better -- i.e. explore the solar system
and/or do lot of science. The problem is the cost goes WAY up. Part of me
thinks permanent manned presence in space for the lowest cost possible might
not be a bad goal for NASA. With the current budget situation, this might
be as much as NASA can do. It certainly is an objective that is easy to
measure. The key is to look at how to get the cost down. As a minimum we
would learn a lot about what is needed to go to Mars someday.

Danny


  #2  
Old March 8th 07, 01:42 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Russian Manned Spaceflight Goal

On Mar 7, 12:00 am, "Danny Deger" wrote:
I worked with the Russians in 1993 when NASA was looking into buying a Soyuz
as the station's lifeboat. They told me their goal at the time was
permanent manned presence in space at minimum cost. If they got some real
science back, great. But to them the Mir itself was a big science
experiment.

Part of me thinks we should do better -- i.e. explore the solar system
and/or do lot of science. The problem is the cost goes WAY up. Part of me
thinks permanent manned presence in space for the lowest cost possible might
not be a bad goal for NASA. With the current budget situation, this might
be as much as NASA can do. It certainly is an objective that is easy to
measure. The key is to look at how to get the cost down. As a minimum we
would learn a lot about what is needed to go to Mars someday.

Danny


One might try to keep the station going without
resupply for 2 years. That would help perfect what's
needed for interplanetary flight without the dangers
of being far from home and beyond help.

One could also test artificial gravity.

A "cheap" reusable launcher (i.e. not the STS)
would also be needed for later interplanetary
flights.

The Russian development of orbital assembly
(i.e. MIR) and orbital refueling (i.e. Progress)
will be the core technologies of EOR construction
of future interplanetary craft.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The End of U.S. Manned Spaceflight? Joseph S. Powell, III Space Shuttle 0 July 29th 03 07:15 PM
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight LooseChanj History 6 July 29th 03 02:19 AM
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight OM History 1 July 26th 03 10:15 AM
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight Rand Simberg History 0 July 26th 03 05:12 AM
"The End of Manned Spaceflight Looms Ever Closer" jeff findley Policy 5 July 13th 03 10:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.