Mass Density=Stars Ages

Stars with very low mass can last 100 trillion years. stars with low
mass 1 trillion years. Sun like mass density stars 10 billion years.
High mass stars 100 million years. Very high mass stars 1 million years.
All figures I read in a book not long ago. The longest time I ever read
for the age of an object was the life of a proton,and it was a Trillion
Trillion Trillion years. Glad they did not say infinitely long(don't
you) Still I know how it would decay,and I find that interesting
Bert

On Feb 15, 10:27 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Stars with very low mass can last 100 trillion years. stars with low
mass 1 trillion years. Sun like mass density stars 10 billion years.
High mass stars 100 million years. Very high mass stars 1 million years.
All figures I read in a book not long ago. The longest time I ever read
for the age of an object was the life of a proton,and it was a Trillion
Trillion Trillion years. Glad they did not say infinitely long(don't
you) Still I know how it would decay,and I find that interesting
Bert


The proton is stable in its current envionment. But what if the
termperature were to rise to 10^30 K, or drop to 10^-30 K?

Double-A

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

On Feb 15, 10:27 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Stars with very low mass can last 100 trillion years. stars with low
mass 1 trillion years. Sun like mass density stars 10 billion years.
High mass stars 100 million years. Very high mass stars 1 million years.
All figures I read in a book not long ago. The longest time I ever read
for the age of an object was the life of a proton,and it was a Trillion
Trillion Trillion years. Glad they did not say infinitely long(don't
you) Still I know how it would decay,and I find that interesting
Bert

Commander Double-A

The proton is stable in its current environment. But what if the
temperature were to rise to 10^30 K, or drop to 10^-30 K?

Double-A



nightbat

Infinity is a long long time Bert, and very astute of you
Commander, for now you're playing with applied temp relative field
disturbed time. Within normal gravity or Earth environment it is stable
but all energy particles have latent memory of present state versus
where they really should be. The field is reciprocal unto itself,(NBL),
so it needs time naturally to return back to pure uniform momentum
without one energy sub quantum particle collision, good luck. However
when heat or cold is added to the equation, time factor applies +- and
life span is also relatively effected. The dynamic ongoing energy phase
momentum loop can be effected both ways by applied temperature degree
gradients but never self returned to full unified momentum without equal
or greater field unified applied energy impulse,(see above nightbat
law). The physical observed immense Universe is not the entire energy
field but only the portion disturbed embedded within it.

continue deep pondering,
the nightbat