![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's an article that CNN has about nuclear power on space probes. I
list some questions about it below http://www.space.com/businesstechnol..._focus_040218- 1.html (Note the line wrap on link.) One thing that kind of bothers me is the statement that, "The Energy Department, working with industry, is designing a space-qualified nuclear fission reactor capable of generating 100 kilowatts of power -- about 1,000 times more than most solar-powered space probes have available today." Is it true that the average space probe today only uses about 100 Watts? I'm pretty sure that thin film collectors can produce up to several kilowatts per kilogram of PV panel (at Earth orbit insolation levels) and that fresnels or other concentrators can improve this power to weight ratio further. OTOH, the thermal energy produced by a kg of PU238 is about 500 Watts and a stirling may only allow them to get 30% of that converted into electricity. Furthermore, new technologies are allowing for even lighter weight PV and light weight solar thermal concentrators. I'd think that you'd have to be very far from the sun or doing fairly exotic things before an RTG only approach would be the best or the cheapest. Also, I was wondering about this. It seems to me that rather than using just Stirlings or just thermal diodes that it should be possible to use the Stirling as the primary source and the thermal diodes to top off. The diodes and thermionics are very light weight. They would remove some of the heat that would otherwise be available to the stirling engine, but if they didn't drop the overall temperature inordinately then I would think that they could still produce net power beyond what the Stirling alone could achieve. Modern thermal diodes can actually be quite efficient. But, of course, like I said above, these same technologies could also be used with solar concentrators on many space probes. -- __________________________________________________ ___ Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com) "It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow' disease, and many others, but I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
G. Forbat's new theory of space REPLY to objections | Gary Forbat | Space Station | 0 | July 5th 04 02:27 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Asteroid First, Moon, Mars...later | Al Jackson | Policy | 28 | September 12th 03 05:58 PM |
Asteroid first, Moon, Mars Later | Al Jackson | Space Science Misc | 0 | September 3rd 03 03:40 PM |
Nuclear power in space | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 5 | August 2nd 03 01:58 AM |