![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many times does a man have to go to the Moon to prove he has been
there? The answer is 6 times. Apollo 9 - the famous and awesome trip Apollo 10 - didn't quite make it Apollo 11 - unfortunate accident due to a launch from a NUKE contaminated Launch Pad (it still registers on a Geiger Counter 27 Years Later) Apollo 12 - the best of the interesting - it never left earth but instead made the most bad video in History Apollo 13 - what an ending! Apollo 14 - Tried to go the Moon when Jupiter was at 2.36 Days to its closest point to Earth. It left Earths Orbit and was on Jupiter in 13.8 Minutes because they tried like hell to use the Moons Graviton to save themselves. Apollo 15 - Tried the same thing and ended up in a Graviton that showed them Jupiter its self just before the Capsule imploded. I believe the Official Transcript read "its massive" Apollo 16 - Unfortunate Mishap - Uh - they did it again. Ok - so, how do we get out of this Gravity hole? Easy. Just fly when Jupiter is opposite the Earth like both Voyagers did and just like the Future missions that will succeed did. Isn't is bull**** when a whole bunch of people try to re-write History just because they want to. Why would anyone do that? How can we learn.. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vtrade" wrote in message ... How many times does a man have to go to the Moon to prove he has been there? The answer is 6 times. Apollo 9 - the famous and awesome trip Around the Earth? Not very famous or interesting. Now Apollo 8 was famous and interesting. Apollo 10 - didn't quite make it Made it as close as it planned? Apollo 11 - unfortunate accident due to a launch from a NUKE contaminated Launch Pad (it still registers on a Geiger Counter 27 Years Later) You mean the same pad countless other missions have launched from since? Apollo 12 - the best of the interesting - it never left earth but instead made the most bad video in History You're rought about one thing, the video was disappointing. Apollo 13 - what an ending! Ayup. Great movie too. Apollo 14 - Tried to go the Moon when Jupiter was at 2.36 Days to its closest point to Earth. It left Earths Orbit and was on Jupiter in 13.8 Minutes because they tried like hell to use the Moons Graviton to save themselves. Umm, yeah, right. Apollo 15 - Tried the same thing and ended up in a Graviton that showed them Jupiter its self just before the Capsule imploded. I believe the Official Transcript read "its massive" Great... somehow everyone else missed reading that particular transcript. Where exactly is it? Apollo 16 - Unfortunate Mishap - Uh - they did it again. Yeah, it sucked that the mission was so successful. Ok - so, how do we get out of this Gravity hole? Easy. Just fly when Jupiter is opposite the Earth like both Voyagers did and just like the Future missions that will succeed did. WTF? Isn't is bull**** when a whole bunch of people try to re-write History just because they want to. Why would anyone do that? How can we learn.. BTW, you forgot about Apollo 17. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:52:49 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote, in part: "Vtrade" wrote in message ... Apollo 14 - Tried to go the Moon when Jupiter was at 2.36 Days to its closest point to Earth. It left Earths Orbit and was on Jupiter in 13.8 Minutes because they tried like hell to use the Moons Graviton to save themselves. Umm, yeah, right. How did the Apollo 14 astronauts get back to Earth then? I don't recall any Apollo astronauts being missing. Apollo 15 - Tried the same thing and ended up in a Graviton that showed them Jupiter its self just before the Capsule imploded. I believe the Official Transcript read "its massive" Great... somehow everyone else missed reading that particular transcript. Where exactly is it? Are you sure the official transcript didn't read "My God! It's full of stars!" I remember encountering that one... I think it's filed under "K". John Savard http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lid (John Savard) writes:
Are you sure the official transcript didn't read "My God! It's full of stars!" In case anybody's interested, ACC still gives interesting interviews http://www.theonionavclub.com/4007/feature1.html (despite the source, this seems to be a real, actual interview, not a parody). Cheers, alex. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vtrade writes:
How many times does a man have to go to the Moon to prove he has been there? The answer is 6 times. Apollo 9 - the famous and awesome trip This was a LEO mission with a CM and LM. Apollo 8 flew around the moon, but carried no LM. Jeff -- Remove "no" and "spam" from email address to reply. If it says "This is not spam!", it's surely a lie. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jeff findley" wrote in message ...
Vtrade writes: Apollo 9 - the famous and awesome trip This was a LEO mission with a CM and LM. Apollo 8 flew around the moon, but carried no LM. Just out of curiosity, what *did* it carry in its trunk then? I can't imagine they just wasted the space on ballast weight... -- __ “A good leader knows when it’s best to ignore the __ ('__` screams for help and focus on the bigger picture.” '__`) //6(6; ©OOL mmiv :^)^\\ `\_-/ http://home.t-online.de/home/ulrich....lmann/redbaron \-_/' |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ool" writes:
"jeff findley" wrote in message ... Apollo 8 flew around the moon, but carried no LM. Just out of curiosity, what *did* it carry in its trunk then? I can't imagine they just wasted the space on ballast weight... From: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/...g?sc=1968-118A A Lunar Module was not used on the Apollo 8 mission but a Lunar Module Test Article which was equivalent in mass (9027 kg) to a Lunar Module was mounted in the spacecraft/launch vehicle adapter as ballast for mass loading purposes. It wasn't a "waste" since the equivalent mass allowed them to test the Saturn V as if there were an LM underneath the CSM. This proved the Saturn V could "do the job". Jeff -- Remove "no" and "spam" from email address to reply. If it says "This is not spam!", it's surely a lie. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why We Shouldn't Go To Mars | Jon Berndt | Space Shuttle | 11 | February 18th 04 03:07 AM |
NASA to Start From Scratch in New [Moon/Mars Exploration] Effort | Tom Abbott | Policy | 14 | January 19th 04 12:12 AM |
NEWS: The allure of an outpost on the Moon | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 2 | January 15th 04 12:56 AM |
Low Earth orbit to Moon trajectory dynamics | Abdul Ahad | Technology | 5 | November 27th 03 03:15 AM |