A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

E=mc2 not quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ? There is no data how much mass (m) is destroyed and how much energy is emitted (E).



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old January 7th 07, 11:34 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default E=mc2 not quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ? There is no data how much mass (m) is destroyed and how much energy is emitted (E).

E=mc2 not quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki in 1945 ? There is no data how much mass (m) is destroyed
and how much energy is emitted (E).

(i) Robert Serber (member of first American team entered
Hiroshima and Nagasaki in September 1945 to assess loses), has
indicated [1] that the efficiency of "Little Boy" weapon [U235 ,
49kg ] that was used against Hiroshima was about 2% only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Serber , R The Los Alamos Primer (U.S. Govt. first published as
LA1, April 1946),
declassified 1965 , annotated book , 1992. also R
.. Serber (editor) , The Los Alamos Primer pp. 38 (Univ. of
California Press, 1992)

(ii) It is assumed that all the atoms don't undergo fission, thus
material is wasted. But no such waste material is specifically measured
quantitatively.
Thus the waste material (nuclear reactor or weapon) must be measured
and corresponding energy is calculated. Only then efficiency will be
explained, why it is 2%
(iii) But no measurements and calculations have been done till date.
Until such calculations and measurements are done specifically, it
cannot be said that E=mc2 is quantitatively confirmed in such cases.
The more information in this regard can be found and issue can be
discussed at
http://www.ajayonline.us

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. [email protected] SETI 3 January 8th 07 11:42 PM
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. [email protected] UK Astronomy 3 December 15th 06 02:59 PM
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. [email protected] Misc 2 December 13th 06 01:15 PM
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. [email protected] Solar 0 December 12th 06 10:58 PM
Mideast Politics - Hiroshima & Nagasaki? . Rod Mollise Amateur Astronomy 12 January 11th 04 01:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.