![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter. That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter. Having this information makes for good science during the first trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter. That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter. Having this information makes for good science during the first trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still, so how can an explosion ever happen there? Double-A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Double-A wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter. That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter. Having this information makes for good science during the first trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still, so how can an explosion ever happen there? Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck of a large singularity! Think about that for a moment. My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert. Cordially, Raving |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Raving wrote: Double-A wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter. That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter. Having this information makes for good science during the first trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still, so how can an explosion ever happen there? Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck of a large singularity! Think about that for a moment. My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert. Cordially, Raving Raving, The singularity is theorized to be a very small object at the very center of a theoretical black hole. The event horizon can be large, but that is just the spherical boundary at the distance from the singularity where the escape velocity becomes greater than the speed of light. This distance called the Schwarzschild radius is interesting to contemplate in that GR predicts that space would become so contracted inside a black hole that the actual radius would be much greater than the circumference divided by 2pi. This is how speculation arises that a whole other universe could exist inside a black hole. I would think that the Schwarzschild radius would have to be considered a radius projected onto flat space. It might be more realistic to talk about a Schwarzschild circumference. Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Double-A wrote: Raving wrote: Double-A wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter. That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter. Having this information makes for good science during the first trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still, so how can an explosion ever happen there? Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck of a large singularity! Think about that for a moment. My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert. Cordially, Raving Raving, The singularity is theorized to be a very small object at the very center of a theoretical black hole. The event horizon can be large, but that is just the spherical boundary at the distance from the singularity where the escape velocity becomes greater than the speed of light. This distance called the Schwarzschild radius is interesting to contemplate in that GR predicts that space would become so contracted inside a black hole that the actual radius would be much greater than the circumference divided by 2pi. This is how speculation arises that a whole other universe could exist inside a black hole. I would think that the Schwarzschild radius would have to be considered a radius projected onto flat space. It might be more realistic to talk about a Schwarzschild circumference. Oh, there is a problem, Double-A. Um ... At the center of the black hole, all the gravitational forces are pulling one away from the center. Tempus fugit. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Raving wrote: Double-A wrote: Raving wrote: Double-A wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter. That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter. Having this information makes for good science during the first trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still, so how can an explosion ever happen there? Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck of a large singularity! Think about that for a moment. My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert. Cordially, Raving Raving, The singularity is theorized to be a very small object at the very center of a theoretical black hole. The event horizon can be large, but that is just the spherical boundary at the distance from the singularity where the escape velocity becomes greater than the speed of light. This distance called the Schwarzschild radius is interesting to contemplate in that GR predicts that space would become so contracted inside a black hole that the actual radius would be much greater than the circumference divided by 2pi. This is how speculation arises that a whole other universe could exist inside a black hole. I would think that the Schwarzschild radius would have to be considered a radius projected onto flat space. It might be more realistic to talk about a Schwarzschild circumference. Oh, there is a problem, Double-A. Um ... At the center of the black hole, all the gravitational forces are pulling one away from the center. Tempus fugit. Kerr did calculate that the ring singularity was repulsive. Double-A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Double-A If there is motion inside a black hole there is time. The
motion takes place from the event horizon to the BH core. Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Raving A short description of a singularity is "Location where the
fabric of space or spacetime suffers a great rupture. Hard to relate that to any rupture in our spacetime. Most scientist agree that a singularity is a point in size That this contraction inside a BH is a region of infinite matter density,infinite energy.and infinite temperature.This comes out of GR. Now if you were comparing my Pee-Air with your Jock that is another story. Lets leave it as two unknowns. Bert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Double-A If there is motion inside a black hole there is time. The motion takes place from the event horizon to the BH core. Bert I don't think there could be any motion inside a black hole, unless it is motion of space-time itself. Double-A |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Double-A" wrote in message
oups.com... G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Double-A If there is motion inside a black hole there is time. The motion takes place from the event horizon to the BH core. Bert I don't think there could be any motion inside a black hole, unless it is motion of space-time itself. According to standard theory there's motion inside the event horizon. In fact, all trajectories lead inevitably towards the singularity at the center. In this regard, the spacial coordinate becomes timelike in character -- outside a black hole we experience time as a relentless progression into the future without deviation, and in a similar fashion, below an event horizon all trajectories lead inevitably towards the singularity. Once ingested, there's no escape! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mass + acceleration = Black Hole | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | November 24th 06 05:31 PM |
Will a big black hole eat a small black hole? | Ted Ratmark | UK Astronomy | 1 | September 16th 05 08:38 AM |
X-rays Signal Presence of Elusive Intermediate-Mass Black Hole | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | April 30th 05 09:28 AM |
Possible intermediate-mass black hole | Ray Vingnutte | Misc | 0 | March 26th 05 01:46 AM |
Black hole mass-sigma correlation | Hans Aberg | Research | 44 | October 1st 03 11:39 PM |