![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2. The fact that the energy withdrawn from the body becomes energy of radiation evidently makes no difference, so that we are led to the more general conclusion that: The mass of a body is a measure of its energy-content; if the energy changes by L, the mass changes in the same sense by L/9 × 1020, the energy being measured in ergs, and the mass in grammes. It is not impossible that with bodies whose energy-content is variable to a high degree (e.g. with radium salts) the theory may be successfully put to the test. If the theory corresponds to the facts, radiation conveys inertia between the emitting and absorbing bodies. Very truly yours, Albert Einstein |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Read for yourself, the American Way of Life may depend on it | astronut | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | September 12th 06 02:06 AM |
Gravity Vs inertia. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 4 | January 22nd 06 02:10 AM |
Static = no Inertia | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 1 | January 19th 06 07:51 PM |
does darkness in sky depend on location? | asger | Misc | 1 | September 6th 03 08:45 PM |
Isp in seconds, energy content of fuel in feet | Allen Thomson | Space Science Misc | 0 | August 17th 03 09:15 PM |