Action-at-a-distance

The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website
describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

kenseto wrote:
The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website
describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto


Rubbish! Learn GTR.

Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website
describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto


Rubbish! Learn GTR.

Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow
the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can
follow its curvature?

kenseto wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website
describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto


Rubbish! Learn GTR.

Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow
the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can
follow its curvature?

If space-time is fundamental, then it can have no mechanism--it *is*
the mechanism.
Philosophical stances don't make for good premises to
counter-arguments, since opinions are as plentiful as assholes.

Richard Perry

RP wrote:
kenseto wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website
describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto


Rubbish! Learn GTR.

Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow
the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can
follow its curvature?

If space-time is fundamental, then it can have no mechanism--it *is*
the mechanism.

What do you mean by space-time is fundamental? Are you using the word
*fundamental* to avoid explaining what is the mechanism for gravity?

Philosophical stances don't make for good premises to
counter-arguments, since opinions are as plentiful as assholes.

Your assertion that space-time is fundamental is a philosophical
stance. So I guess that your assertion is one of those asshole that you
mentioned.

Ken Seto

kenseto wrote:

Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website
describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Translation: "I strung a new pseudoscientific word salad together and
pasted it into my kook****e."

Ken Seto


Rubbish! Learn GTR.

Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow
the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can
follow its curvature?

kenseto gets frothy again -- film at 10:00pm.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

Hi, fanbois!