![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have declassified cable from one unidentified party to another
equally unidentified party relating to a laser vulnerability experiment that was being considered using the CORONA Mission 1115. One assumes that the parties were in the CIA/USAF/NRO. The cable is dated 17 September 1971, during the flight, which was launched on 10 September and dropped two film buckets on September 18 and September 29. It's interesting that the document discusses not only a blinding experiment, but also looking at grosser physical effects such as heating and solar cell degradation after the second bucket had been dropped -- i.e., on or not much after after 29 September 1971. Obviously, there must have been a high-powered laser with associated beam director/tracking mount available for quick- response tasking. It is only identified as "the RML capability" Perhaps NML or HML -- my copy of the cable is in bad shape. If anyone is interested, I can email a scan of it.) Does anybody here know what the [RNH]ML capability might have been? Or, in general, what lasers/beam directors were around at the time that would have been able to cause significant heating and possible solar cell damage to a satellite? Laser blinding capability in 1971 wouldn't be surprising, but what else was around? (It's also interesting that the satellite carried solar cells. The basic CORONA ran on batteries, but Mission 1115 was a KH-4B/J-3 model, which was the last of the line and considerably bigger than earlier ones. It would be interesting to find out if the solar cells were used for main mission power or something else.) Here's an ASCIIized version of the cable; it's printed on a standard message form, which has the headers "CLASSIFIED MESSAGE", "SECRET" "(When Filled In)" and "REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED". It bears the declassification stamp Declassified and Released by the NRO In Accordance with E.O. 12958 on NOV 26 1997 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [REDACTED] SECRET 172158Z SEP 71 CITE [REDACTED] PRIORITY [REDACTED] INFO PRORITY [ REDACTED ] [REDACTED] CORONA SUBJ: LASER ILLUMINATED SATELLITE VEHICLE PHOTOGRAPHIC EXPERIMENT REF: PHONECON[ REDACTED ] 16 SEP 1. IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU DEVELOP A PLAN FOR THE CONDUCT OF A LASER ILLUMINATED PHOTOGRAPHIC EXPERIENT UTILIZING THE R[HN?]ML CAPABILITY AND CORONA 1115 AS THE TARGET VEHICLE. YOUR PLANNING SHOULD ADDRESS THE APPROPRIATE ASPECTS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC OPERATIONS DURING THE ACTIVE PORTION OF MISSION 1115 WHEN THE PAYLOAD COULD DETECT THE ILLUMINATOR AND LATER PAGE 2 [REDACTED] SECRET OPERATIONS AFTER RV-2 RECOVERY WHEN HIGHER LEVELS OF ILLUMINATION MIGHT BE PRACTICAL. IN THIS LATTER PHASE, THE POTENTIAL FOR DETECTING DESTRUCTIVE ILLUMINATION EFFECTS (HEATING, SOLAR CELL DEGRADATION, ETC.) THROUGHT THE VEHICLE TELEMETRY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. 2. REQUEST YOU ADVISE THIS OFFICE AS TO POTENTIAL SCHEDULES RISK, AND OTHER PERTINENT DATA WHICH WOULD AFFECT AN APPROVAL DECISION AS AVAILABLE. POINT OF CONTACT IS [REDACTED] OR [REDACTED] SECRET BT [PERHAPS DT] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.space.policy Allen Thomson wrote:
B : Obviously, there must have been a high-powered laser with : associated beam director/tracking mount available for quick- : response tasking. It is only identified as "the RML capability" : Perhaps NML or HML -- my copy of the cable is in bad shape. If : anyone is interested, I can email a scan of it.) : Does anybody here know what the [RNH]ML capability might have been? : Or, in general, what lasers/beam directors were around at the time : that would have been able to cause significant heating and possible : solar cell damage to a satellite? Laser blinding capability in 1971 : wouldn't be surprising, but what else was around? The facility being used was probably the Malabar Test Facility. Specifically, IIRC in 1971 it was used in similar tests on nudet sensors, and had been the primary space/laser facility since its establishment in the 60s. I'm not certain exactly what "RML" means. regards, ------------------------------------------------------ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven James Forsberg wrote
The facility being used was probably the Malabar Test Facility. Specifically, IIRC in 1971 it was used in similar tests on nudet sensors, and had been the primary space/laser facility since its establishment in the 60s. I'm not certain exactly what "RML" means. Thank you, Malabar does seem like a good possibiity. According to http://www.fas.org/spp/military/prog...ck/malabar.htm , The OL-AG, Phillips Laboratory's mission is to perform real-time tracking of space objects, to use various sensors to study the effects of physical phenomena on space vehicles, to develop and test new sensors and electrooptical devices, and to provide tracking support for Kennedy Space Center(KSC) and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) launches. The Malabar test facility was opened in the early 1960s to study lasers and laser effects... I'd still like to know what laser was considered for producing heating effects and solar cell degradation -- perhaps a FOIA request is in order. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GR experiment proposed for ISS | Karl Hallowell | Technology | 0 | March 27th 04 10:57 AM |
20040308224949-20252: Need an exact description (blue prints ?) of the Lunar Laser reflectors left by Apollo. | Rusty Barton | Space Science Misc | 0 | March 9th 04 06:49 AM |
20040308224949-20252: Need an exact description (blue prints ?) of the Lunar Laser reflectors left by Apollo. | Rusty Barton | Technology | 0 | March 9th 04 06:49 AM |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |
NASA Selects Commercial Space Ride For Technology Experiment | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | September 4th 03 06:15 PM |