![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what do we need to do before we send men back ?
A couple of things I came up with a An orbiter to map the Moon in detail especially the poles. Many areas of the Moon today are not mapped to 20 m resolution we can easily do 10m for the entire moon and 1-2m for selected portions. A follow on to Prospector getting a better idea of where the hydrogen is. A radar map to give us a picture at depth of the Moons surface. A couple of landers at potential base sites would be usefull. What did I miss in my quick list? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dholmes" wrote in message .. .
what do we need to do before we send men back ? A couple of things I came up with a An orbiter to map the Moon in detail especially the poles. Many areas of the Moon today are not mapped to 20 m resolution we can easily do 10m for the entire moon and 1-2m for selected portions. A follow on to Prospector getting a better idea of where the hydrogen is. A radar map to give us a picture at depth of the Moons surface. A couple of landers at potential base sites would be usefull. What did I miss in my quick list? Development of: - Solar Electric tug to transport cargo from LEO to Lunar Orbit - Lunar chemistry kit, to extract Oxygen from lunar soils - Construction techniques appropriate to lunar conditions, e.g cut and cover - Edible plants that can grow in a lunar cycle - Cheap and easy (not neccessarily efficient) solar cells that can be manufactured on the moon or in space. - Virtual Reality controlled robots for work on the lunar surface, controlled in doors or even from Earth. - Remote controlled digging machines that can collect ores from the lunar surface |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dholmes wrote:
What did I miss in my quick list? Development of a communications relay satellite in a halo orbit around the L2 Lagrange point in the Earth-Moon-system, providing a communications link to the far side of the Moon. From http://www.tsgc.utexas.edu/archive/design/farside.html "During the construction phase, a satellite in an L2 halo orbit will relay data from the lunar surface to a geostationary satellite in Earth orbit to the Earth's surface. When the base becomes fully operational, however, a radio-free sky is desired to take accurate astronomical readings. Therefore, a fiber optic cable will be used as a communication link from the base to a transmitter/receiver station on the near side of the Moon. It will be laid out by a robotic rover from the base to the limb of the Moon. From there, the signal can be broadcasted directly to Earth without interfering with astronomical observations." From http://www.tsgc.utexas.edu/archive/design/farside2.html "To provide constant communication with the lunar nearside base as well as Earth, a communication system was devised where the relaying point is a satellite in a halo orbit about the L2 unstable libration point. This would permit full coverage of the lunar farside and the constant monitoring of the construction activities being conducted. Since L2 is an unstable libration point, stationkeeping burns totaling 93.3 fps/yr and period control burns totaling 240 fps/yr will have to be conducted in order to maintain the orbit. After three years, the satellite at L2 will be refueled and moved to the stable libration point L5, where it will remain throughout the lifetime of the observatory." From http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...TIN...9512644B "Project ECHO: Electronic Communications from Halo Orbit - Abstract: The design of a communications relay to provide constant access between the Earth and the far side of the Moon is presented. Placement of the relay in a halo orbit about the L2 Earth-Moon Lagrange point allows the satellite to maintain constant simultaneous communication between Earth and scientific payloads on the far side of the Moon. The requirements of NASA's Discovery-class missions adopted and modified for this design a total project cost should not exceed $150 million excluding launch costs, launch must be provided by Delta-class vehicle, and the satellite should maintain an operational lifetime of 10 to 15 years. The spacecraft will follow a transfer trajectory to the L2 point, after launch by a Delta II 7925 vehicle in 1999. Low-level thrust is used for injection into a stationkeeping-free halo orbit once the spacecraft reaches the L2 point. The shape of this halo orbit is highly elliptical with the maximum excursion from the L2 point being 35000 km. A spun section and despun section connected through a bearing and power transfer assembly (BAPTA) compose the structure of the spacecraft. Communications equipment is placed on the despun section to provide for a stationary dual parabolic offset-feed array antenna system. The dual system is necessary to provide communications coverage during portions of maximum excursion on the halo orbit. Transmissions to the NASA Deep Space Network 34 m antenna include six channels (color video, two voice, scientific data from lunar payloads, satellite housekeeping and telemetry and uplinked commands) using the S- and X-bands. Four radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG's) provide a total of 1360 W to power onboard systems and any two of the four Hughes 13 cm ion thrusters at once. Output of the ion thrusters is approximately 17.8 mN each with xenon as the propellant. Presence of torques generated by solar pressure on the antenna dish require the addition of a 'skirt' extending from the spun section of the satellite for balance. Total mass of the satellite is approximately 900 kg at a cost of $130 million FY99." I wasn't able to find a suitable illustration on the web, so I scanned an illustration (it's a very rough sketch!) from a book I have ("Voyage through the Universe - Spacefarers", Time-Life Books 1989, Danish ed., pp. 58-59): http://www.dsri.dk/~sej/pics/lunar_halo_orbit.jpg -- Steen Eiler Jørgensen "Time has resumed its shape. All is as it was before. Many such journeys are possible. Let me be your gateway." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steen Eiler Jørgensen wrote: Dholmes wrote: What did I miss in my quick list? Development of a communications relay satellite in a halo orbit around the L2 Lagrange point in the Earth-Moon-system, providing a communications link to the far side of the Moon. From http://www.tsgc.utexas.edu/archive/design/farside.html "During the construction phase, a satellite in an L2 halo orbit will relay data from the lunar surface to a geostationary satellite in Earth orbit to the Earth's surface. When the base becomes fully operational, however, a radio-free sky is desired to take accurate astronomical readings. Therefore, a fiber optic cable will be used as a communication link from the base to a transmitter/receiver station on the near side of the Moon. It will be laid out by a robotic rover from the base to the limb of the Moon. From there, the signal can be broadcasted directly to Earth without interfering with astronomical observations." From http://www.tsgc.utexas.edu/archive/design/farside2.html Sounds like a good idea to me. This is also the proposed location for the James Webb space telescope: http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...st_030108.html -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dholmes wrote: what do we need to do before we send men back ? A couple of things I came up with a An orbiter to map the Moon in detail especially the poles. Many areas of the Moon today are not mapped to 20 m resolution we can easily do 10m for the entire moon and 1-2m for selected portions. A follow on to Prospector getting a better idea of where the hydrogen is. I am hoping ESA's SMART-1 will give helpful information: http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=10 A radar map to give us a picture at depth of the Moons surface. A couple of landers at potential base sites would be usefull. What did I miss in my quick list? -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hop David wrote:
Sounds like a good idea to me. This is also the proposed location for the James Webb space telescope: One should be careful using a term like "L2". There is an important distinction between which system "L2" refers to. The JWST is to be parked in L2 in the Sun-Earth-system (in orbit around the Sun, 1.5 million km farther out than the Earth, but with the same angular velocity around the Sun as the Earth), while the LUFASIRS (homemade NASA acronym for Lunar Far Side Relay Satellite :-) ) will be in orbit around L2 in the Earth-Moon-system (in orbit around the Earth, somewhat farther out than the Moon, but with the same angular velocity around the Earth as the Moon). A comms relay satellite at L2 in the Sun-Earth-system would only be able to support comms from the far side of the Moon half of its 29,5 days synodic period. Another important distinction between the JWST and the LUFASIRS is that while the JWST can probably be "parked" fairly close to the L2 (depending on how many spacecraft are already out there), the LUFASIRS must orbit this point at a considerable distance, as to prevent the Moon from blocking the satellite's view of Earth. -- Steen Eiler Jørgensen "Time has resumed its shape. All is as it was before. Many such journeys are possible. Let me be your gateway." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What did I miss in my quick list?
A hab module and means to cover it with regolith to protect the crew from cosmic rays. The shuttle's ET's would make cheap and easy habs but nasa is blockading space and won't give them up. ^ //^\\ ~~~ near space elevator ~~~~ ~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steen Eiler Jørgensen wrote: Hop David wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me. This is also the proposed location for the James Webb space telescope: One should be careful using a term like "L2". There is an important distinction between which system "L2" refers to. The JWST is to be parked in L2 in the Sun-Earth-system (in orbit around the Sun, 1.5 million km farther out than the Earth, but with the same angular velocity around the Sun as the Earth), while the LUFASIRS (homemade NASA acronym for Lunar Far Side Relay Satellite :-) ) will be in orbit around L2 in the Earth-Moon-system (in orbit around the Earth, somewhat farther out than the Moon, but with the same angular velocity around the Earth as the Moon). Of course it's obvious you meant the earth-moon L2 and not the earth-sun L2. I didn't have my thinking cap on this morning. A comms relay satellite at L2 in the Sun-Earth-system would only be able to support comms from the far side of the Moon half of its 29,5 days synodic period. Another important distinction between the JWST and the LUFASIRS is that while the JWST can probably be "parked" fairly close to the L2 (depending on how many spacecraft are already out there), IIRC correctly they also wanted a halo for the JWST that would keep a minimum angular separation between earth and sun. I guess it's not good to point your communication dish in a near sunward direction. the LUFASIRS must orbit this point at a considerable distance, as to prevent the Moon from blocking the satellite's view of Earth. -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Hop David wrote: IIRC correctly they also wanted a halo for the JWST that would keep a minimum angular separation between earth and sun. I guess it's not good to point your communication dish in a near sunward direction. The usual problem is not damage to the hardware -- even if you're using a solid dish rather than a mesh one, problems with focusing of sunlight can be limited by choosing a suitable paint -- but added noise in the receivers from having the Sun in the background. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what do we need to do before we send men back ?"
A good economic reason! "Dholmes" wrote in message ... what do we need to do before we send men back ? A couple of things I came up with a An orbiter to map the Moon in detail especially the poles. Many areas of the Moon today are not mapped to 20 m resolution we can easily do 10m for the entire moon and 1-2m for selected portions. A follow on to Prospector getting a better idea of where the hydrogen is. A radar map to give us a picture at depth of the Moons surface. A couple of landers at potential base sites would be usefull. What did I miss in my quick list? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pittsburgh poll on return to moon | bob haller | Space Shuttle | 8 | July 22nd 04 09:32 PM |
NEWS: The allure of an outpost on the Moon | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 2 | January 15th 04 12:56 AM |
Bush may announce return to the moon | Dr. O | Policy | 108 | November 21st 03 04:40 AM |
NEWS - Bush May Announce Return To Moon At Kitty Hawk - Space Daily | Rusty B | Policy | 94 | November 5th 03 08:50 PM |