![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse theory gives the best answer so far |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse theory gives the best answer so far Beeert, Beeeert, Beeert ... all this stuff was explained to you before, time and again. Yet you go and get hammered on Bud, pass out and then promptly forget everything you learned that day. Look at ANY explosion (there should be a zillion clips available, on-line). You will see that the expanding pressure shell is not linear. The billowing is caused by pressure differentials in the expanding shell, pretty much like shortly after the BB. While an Earthly explosion is eventually halted by the Earth's gravity and the resistance of the surrounding atmosphere, the BB had no such obstacles. Since the mass distribution was not homogenous, some parts of the expanding material traveled at a slightly higher clip than the slightly less dense areas. This set up small eddies between the two. These eddies then accumulated mass and with mass they developed gravity, which in turn attracted more mass etc. Since this occurred at all directions and distances from the original focal point of the BB, the earliest stars were formed at random distances from each other. They became the original Super Giants, who exhausted their lives in Supernovae, in a relatively short time, to become the first black holes. They, in turn, attracted more cosmic stuff, which then formed the preset day galaxies. All the original galaxies were of the spiral variety, however, when two of them collided, they merged into one spherical galaxy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hagar Hagar Hagar (The horrible) I read that crappy explanation many
times. If you had a Bud to flush the cobwebs out of your brain you would know most of that theory is ****. If you were not such a parrot I could discuss the reasons it does not fit . Mean while This Bud's on me "cheers" Bert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what should stop it from expanding, and "collapse inward on itself" ?
please stop drinking and use common sense instead, nothing and i mean nothing logical indicates one huge galaxy, instead of trillions of galaxies this is my "Bert drinks too much theory" and can be used to answer the question (why?) every time Bert publish a theory with missing logic Bert don't take it personal, but now and then you gotta used known facts if you want to understand things "G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse ... After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse theory gives the best answer so far -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere. Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 35 spam-mails Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails. Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Hagar Hagar Hagar (The horrible) I read that crappy explanation many times. If you had a Bud to flush the cobwebs out of your brain you would know most of that theory is ****. If you were not such a parrot I could discuss the reasons it does not fit . Mean while This Bud's on me "cheers" Bert Back to the Beeeer, Beeeert. It seems I'm not the only one who disagrees with your convoluted concoctions. Go ahead, sleep it off and take another stab at it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse theory gives the best answer so far Or you could simply learn some physics. Suggest you look up something called Jeans length - an object will grow from a density fluctuation provided that the fluctuation extends over a distance taht exceeds the Jeans length. This was discovered by James Jeans back in 1902 and is consistent with the fluctuations seen in the background radiation a la WMAP and COBE. No need for some (non)theory you think you have found (of course we can get into the definition of theory from a science standpoint but then that would simply prove how little you really know). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Starman Stop using the word facts The word fact means 100% true (truth
of reality) We are talking about actions that took place 22 billion years ago ,the spacetime of the big bang. Speculation (yes) Theories (yes) 'but facts' ???? Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott you find fault with every thing I say. You do not know my latest
time lapse theory and you are already knocking it. I doubt very much if you are a teacher. What school would want a person that has so little respect for another person's original thinking. That guy Jeans did not have accelerators,or Hubble space telescope back in 1902. Best you keep that in mind. Oops I forgot you have no mind of your own. You are a parrot. Reality is its the parrot brains that attack me personally,and can only find fault with every one of my theories. Shame on you all Reality is some of my theories have been discussed in schools in many countries,and words like "fascinating",challenging" and have you published have been used Go figure Bert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Miller wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse theory gives the best answer so far Or you could simply learn some physics. Suggest you look up something called Jeans length - an object will grow from a density fluctuation provided that the fluctuation extends over a distance taht exceeds the Jeans length. This was discovered by James Jeans back in 1902 and is consistent with the fluctuations seen in the background radiation a la WMAP and COBE. No need for some (non)theory you think you have found (of course we can get into the definition of theory from a science standpoint but then that would simply prove how little you really know). I read a book by Sir James Jeans in my adolescence, "The Growth of Physical Science". He was a good writer as well as a scientist. Double-A |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Facts = established knowledge, that is not nessesary the same as 100 % true,
facts can even change (eg. I have 2 cars, that is fact, but if i get 1 more i have 3 and then my facts have changed) no we are NOT talking about actions that took place 22 billion years ago, it's more like 13 -14 billion years ago is there trillions of galaxies? you say speculation, theories, I say fact did the universe break up in BB? you say speculation, theories, I say fact if logical thinking tells you one big galaxy, then BB wouldn't be possible, therefor it's not logical thinking Where have you published your "time lapse theory" ? And why did you choose to take it personally anyway ? ;-) "G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse ... Starman Stop using the word facts The word fact means 100% true (truth of reality) We are talking about actions that took place 22 billion years ago ,the spacetime of the big bang. Speculation (yes) Theories (yes) 'but facts' ???? Bert --- Berts first post inserted here After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse theory gives the best answer so far -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere. Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 46 spam-mails Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails. Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Welcome! - read this first | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 9 | February 2nd 06 01:37 AM |
Teleportation knowledge analizer of the internet matirx! IT's a | Roger wilco | History | 4 | July 8th 05 06:11 PM |
GRAVITATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 13th 04 03:17 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | May 21st 04 11:44 PM |