Sandman digest, volume 2453992

Classic "oar pin" Tholenator(tm) " tholed:

What does one allegedly endure when writing, dizzy?

Classic pontification.


tholen tholed:

What does one allegedly endure when writing, dizzy?

Non sequitur.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Non sequitur.


tholen tholed:


Non sequitur.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic thole.

Non sequitur; an oar pin is not at issue, dizzy.

Ambiguous.


tholen tholed:

What does one allegedly endure when writing, dizzy?

Non sequitur.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic thole.

Non sequitur; an oar pin is not at issue, dizzy.

Who said that it was, tholen?

You're the one who brought it up, dizzy.

Classic lack of specificity.



tholen tholed:

What does one allegedly endure when writing, dizzy?

Non sequitur.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic thole.

Non sequitur; an oar pin is not at issue, dizzy.

Who said that it was, tholen?

You're the one who brought it up, dizzy.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Ambiguous.


Having memory problems, dizzy?

Not at all, tholen.

Then why couldn't you remember that you're the one who brought up
an oar pin, dizzy?

Classic failure to comprehend the point.


(tholes snipped)

Classic dishonesty,

On your part, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument.


given that I did not write the above,

No need to tell me about it, tholen.

So your dishonesty was intentional, eh dizzy?

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Illogical, given that I asked a question, dizzy, rather than made
a presupposition.

Your question was illogical, tholen,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


because it was based the
erroneous presupposition that there was any dishonesty on my part.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.


You clearly
attributed some text to me that I had not written, dizzy.

I explicitly wrote that your tholes were snipped, tholen,

You explicitly wrote it with a level of indentation that indicated
that I had written it rather than you, dizzy, which is dishonest of
you.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

And then you had the gall to claim that the dishonesty is on
my part, which is also dishonest of you, dizzy.

Classic inappropriate analogy.


which you
would know, if you had better reading comprehension skills.

Ironic that you should talk about reading comprehension problems,
dizzy, given that you're the one unable to recognize the dishonesty
of your writing.

How ironic.


That is dishonest.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim,

On your part, dizzy.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

and rather ironic,

Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?

Classic erroneous presupposition.


given your dishonesty, tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, given your
dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


I explicitly wrote that your tholes were snipped, tholen.

You explicitly wrote it with a level of indentation that indicated
that I had written it rather than you, dizzy,

I explicitly wrote that your tholes were snipped, tholen,

You explicitly wrote it with a level of indentation that indicated
that I had written it rather than you, dizzy,

I explicitly wrote that your tholes were snipped, tholen,

You explicitly wrote it with a level of indentation that indicated
that I had written it rather than you, dizzy,

I explicitly wrote that your tholes were snipped, tholen,

You explicitly wrote it with a level of indentation that indicated
that I had written it rather than you, dizzy, which is dishonest of
you.

Ambiguous.

And then you had the gall to claim that the dishonesty is on
my part, which is also dishonest of you, dizzy.

Classic inconsistency.


which you
would know, if you had better reading comprehension skills.

Ironic that you should talk about reading comprehension problems,
dizzy, given that you're the one unable to recognize the dishonesty
of your writing.

Classic erroneous presupposition.


which is dishonest of you.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim,

On your part, dizzy.

Classic lack of specificity.


and rather ironic,

Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


given your dishonesty, tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, given your
dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic evasion of the point.


And then you had the gall to claim that the dishonesty is on
my part, which is also dishonest of you, dizzy.

My method of indicating snippage is accepted usenet practice.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic failure to comprehend the point.


You're being dishonest, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Illogical.


which you
would know, if you had better reading comprehension problems.

Ironic that you should talk about reading comprehension problems,
dizzy,

Where is the irony, allegedly, tholen?

I just finished telling you where, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, dizzy?

Irrelevant.


given that you're the one unable to recognize the dishonesty
of your writing.

Because there was none, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument.


which is dishonest of you.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Illogical.


And then you had the gall to claim that the dishonesty is on
my part, which is also dishonest of you, dizzy.

My method of indicating snippage is accepted usenet practice.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic evasion of the point.


You're being dishonest, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


Rather ironic,

Where is the irony, allegedly, tholen?

I just finished telling you where, dizzy.

Classic failure to comprehend the point.

Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, dizzy?

Classic inconsistency.


coming from someone being as dishonest as you are, dizzy.

How ironic,

Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?

You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.


coming from someone being as dishonest as you are, tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, given your
dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


which you
would know, if you had better reading comprehension problems.

Ironic that you should talk about reading comprehension problems,
dizzy,

Where is the irony, allegedly, tholen?

I just finished telling you where, dizzy.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Irrelevant.


Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, dizzy?

Not at all, tholen.

Then why were you unable to see where the irony is after I had just
finished telling you where the irony is, dizzy?

Classic lack of specificity.


given that you're the one unable to recognize the dishonesty
of your writing.

Because there was none, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


which is dishonest of you.


Classic unsubstantiated claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Classic pontification.


And then you had the gall to claim that the dishonesty is on
my part,

My method of indicating snippage is accepted usenet practice.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


You're being dishonest, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic failure to comprehend the point.


You are dishonestly accusing me of dishonesty, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


Your dishonesty is obvious, dizzy,

Why, that's not even grammatical, tholen.

What does that have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument.


given how you attributed text to me that you had written.

My method of indicating snippage is accepted usenet practice.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic erroneous presupposition.


You're being dishonest, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic failure to comprehend the point.


Rather ironic,

Where is the irony, allegedly, tholen?

I just finished telling you where, dizzy.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Classic inappropriate analogy.


Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, dizzy?

Not at all, tholen.

Then why were you unable to see where the irony is after I had just
finished telling you where the irony is, dizzy?

Classic inconsistency.


coming from someone being as dishonest as you are, dizzy.

That would be no dishonesty at all, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Ambiguous.


There was obviously no intent on my part to mislead anyone.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


Classic dishonesty on your part, tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, given your
dishonesty, dizzy.

Note: no response.


You dishonesty is obvious, dizzy,

Classic dishonesty on your part, tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, given your
dishonesty, dizzy.

How ironic.


given how you attributed text to me that you had written.

My method of indicating snippage is accepted usenet practice.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


You're being dishonest, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


Are you really claiming, tholen, that my intent was to mislead readers
of this group into thinking that you wrote "(tholes snipped)"?

I am really claiming that you wrote "(tholes snipped)" with a level of
indentation that indicated that I had written it rather than you, dizzy.

Thanks for admitting that there was no intent to mislead,

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, dizzy?

Illogical.

There was
no such admission.

Classic evasion of the point.


and therefore no dishonesty on my part, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


Clearly, I was just trying to save bandwidth.

Illogical, given that the presence of indentation consumes more
bandwidth than the absence of indentation, the latter being the
correct indication that you wrote "(tholes snipped)", dizzy.

Classic pontification.


Of course, I said that already, which you would know by now if you had
better reading comprehension skills, dizzy.

Illogical, tholen,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


given that you are being dishonest.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic pontification.


It's very kooky,

Your postings here have been very kooky, dizzy.

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, tholen?

What does your ridiculous question have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


What's kooky is your dishonest claim that my "(tholes snipped)" was
dishonest.

Classic erroneous presupposition that I made a dishonest claim, dizzy.

Classic failure to comprehend the point.


Rather ironic, coming from someone who dishonestly attributed text to
me that wasn't written by me.

Non sequitur.


Only a kook would make a big issue of the way I showed snippage,
tholen.

Considering the 456 lines you just posted about the way you showed
snippage, dizzy, you made a big issue of it, which means that you
are a kook, using your own description.

Irrelevant.


Apparently you are still hurting over my recent proofs of your
dishonesty, eh tholen?

Classic erroneous presupposition of any such proofs of any
dishonesty on my part, dizzy.

Classic inconsistency.


Well, kooking-out over the way I showed
snippage isn't helping your cause, tholen

Considering the 456 lines you just posted about the way you showed
snippage, dizzy, you made a big issue of it, which means that you
are kooking-out over it, using your own description.

Liar.


- it's just more evidence that you're a dishonest kook.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic failure to comprehend the point.


and dishonest,

Your attribution to me of text you wrote is indeed dishonest, dizzy.

My method of indicating snippage is accepted usenet practice.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


You're being dishonest, tholen.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


of you to claim that my "(tholes snipped)" was dishonest, tholen.

Your claim was indeed dishonest, given the level of indentation that
indicated that I had written it rather than you, dizzy.

My method of indicating snippage is accepted usenet practice.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic evasion of the point.


You're being dishonest, tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


Of course, I
said that already, which you would know by now if you had better
reading comprehension skills, dizzy.

Illogical, tholen,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.


given that you are being dishonest.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic erroneous presupposition.


It wasn't dishonest, tholen,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


and you know it, tholen.

Classic illogic, given that I know and have been clearly stating the
opposite, dizzy.


Illogical, tholen,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


given that you are being dishonest.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
given your dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


Still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
dizzy?

Not at all, tholen.

Then why weren't you able to comprehend that I had clearly stated the
opposite, dizzy?

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


Classic antagonism.

Your postings here have been very antagonistic, dizzy.

How ironic,

Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?

Liar.


given your false accusations of dishonesty, tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition of false accusations on my part,
dizzy.

Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument.

Rather ironic, coming from you, given your false accusations
of dishonesty on my part, dizzy.

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


which is also dishonest of you, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.


yet youattributed it to me anyway, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


That was very kooky, tholen!

I'm well aware that Sandman's ongoing harassment is very kooky,
dizzy.


Rather ironic, tholen.

Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?

Some would say that your "Sandman digest" threads constitute
harassment, tholen.

What some would say is irrelevant, dizzy. What is relevant are the
facts, and one fact is that Sandman is the party responsible for
the harassment.

I think you mean "is partly" responsible, tholen.

What you think is also irrelevant, dizzy. What is relevant are the
facts, and one fact is that Sandman is the party responsible for
the harassment.

I think you mean "is partly" responsible, tholen.

What you think is also irrelevant, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

What is relevant are the
facts, and one fact is that Sandman is the party responsible for
the harassment.

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


It takes two to tango, tholen.

Non sequitur, given that dancing isn't an issue, dizzy.

It's a metaphor, kook.

Who is "kook", dizzy?

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


Classic dishonest tholing,

How does one allegedly endure dishonestly, dizzy?

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

Classic illogic
on your part.

Classic erroneous presupposition.


to pretend to not understand my point...

Classic erroneous presupposition that I don't understand that your
point is to harass, dizzy.

Classic evasion of the point.

No need to tell me about it.

Are you sure, tholen?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

About as much as your tholing does, tholen.

What am I allegedly enduring, dizzy?

The unpleasant consequences of your unpleasant behavior, one would
suppose...


Classic erroneous presupposition.

Do you really think so,

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, dizzy?

Classic evasion of the point.


or are you being dishonest again, tholen?

Classic erroneous presupposition that I was dishonest before, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been dishonest.

You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.


Rather ironic that you should talk
about unpleasant behavior, considering your own unpleasant behavior,
dizzy.

Ever stopped to wonder why you seem to inspire unpleasantness others,
tholen?

Classic erroneous presupposition that I inspire "unpleasantness others",
dizzy.

Irrelevant.


Rather ironic,

Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?

Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument.


coming from someone who has been dishonest.

Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, given your
dishonesty, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


Maybe by doing things like throwing a tantrum over my
snipping your redundant tholes

Non sequitur, given that there has been no snipping of redundant
oar pins, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.


and replacing them with "(tholes snipped)",

Classic erroneous presupposition that there were any oar pins to
replace, dizzy.

You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.


as if I dishonestly intended to mislead readers as to what
you had written?

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


You're the one who used a level of indentation that indicated that
I had written the text, dizzy, when in fact you had written the
text.

Non sequitur.

That's being dishonest, dizzy.

Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument.


Kook.

I'm well aware that you're a kook, dizzy.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

No need to tell me about it.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen