Gravity is a chain reaction in an equilibrium of chaos & entropy.

Roulette is a 50/50 game if you are playing black vs red, except for
the one green slip of the wheel, but the odds of hitting that are very
remote.

So here is a scam you can test out at home.


Get 21 pennies, and a quarter.


Now get 3 pennies and the quarter ready. Put 2 pennies in a pile, and
one by itself.


If the quarter comes up heads move the penny by itself into the pile of

2, and tails you do the opposite.


The odds are 50% higher that you will win at roulette if you have the
pile of 2 pennies. And here is why. Because the extra pennie is a
freebie that your pretty girlfriend scored from some stooge playing
poker who was probably on a winning streak.


Now you can keep playing this game by adding a penny to each pile, and
the odds of you taking the whole pot continue to go down logically.
When you are playing 3 on 2, the odds of winning aren't 50% higher,
they are only 25% higher. And with each penny you add the odds go down

by half. Or something like that. You do the math.


But the more money your girlfriend hustles the greater your odds of
winning at roulette are. Or you could bring in fake chips yourself.
But the great thing is the more free chips your playing with, the more
of the casinos pot you have a good chance of raking in.


It doesn't matter, just always bet on black.


There are lots of other ways to get that "free penny" as well. Being
able to read good body language at a poker table gets you a free penny,

being a pretty girl gets you that extra, I'm going to overbet my bad
hand penny. You know


But the idea is that if you play the 50/50 game, and you always trying
to win just half of what you are willing to gamble, your odds improve
greatly.


2 against 1 , you have a 66% chance of winning


You win that pot


3 against 1, you have a 75% chance of winning


4 against 2, you have a 66% chance of winning.

So every time you win a pot you get a free penny!

And once you go up on a streak of luck like this, even when you start
to come down, you can continue going back up, and find a happy medium.
You just have to know when to quit, and know how to score those free
pennies. Just look at the whole pot that you have at the time as
something you are willing to risk to get whatever 'goal' you have at
the time.

Can you imagine what the odds would look like if you only go after one
penny as your goal? As the pile of pennies on your side keeps growing
larger, your odds go up exponentially after you reach each goal. But
obviously there is still a chance you will lose everything because you
are risking all of your pennies to win.

Now that this post is featured on JREF let me explain the math a little
bit more.

If I have 2 pennies and I want to start a chain reaction, in a 50/50
game, then I only go after one pennie at a time.

There are 3 ways the game can go, I can lose a penny, get it back, and
then score the penny that is my goal. Or I can win the penny right
off. Or I can lose completely.

So I have a 66.6% chance of winning

And now that I have 3 pennies and I go after one more penny, the odds
are 75% that I will win, because there are 3 ways I can win and 1 way I
can lose.

If I take the chance of playing these two games in a row, There are 7
ways I can win and 5 ways I can lose. So the chances of winning are
2/3 + 3/4 = 5/7. And that's 71.42857%

Which is a whole lot better than starting with 2 pennies and playing
against 2 pennies!!

It can only be explained as gravity, and astrological magnetism. Or
maybe, the butterfly effect?

wrote:

crapectomy

It can only be explained as gravity, and astrological magnetism. Or
maybe, the butterfly effect?

The director's cut was good. The studio release was lame.

Shawn

Gravity is a property of matter. Matter in motion also has a property
of gravity, but of a different nature than a stationary body. Gravity
has both components of the Lorentz Force, and the fields established by
matter, whether stationary or in motion, can be derived from Maxwell's
equations. Matter in motion, and photons, are vector potentials for
mass. Read http://savefile.com/projects/880850 to understand more about
this.



wrote:
Roulette is a 50/50 game if you are playing black vs red, except for
the one green slip of the wheel, but the odds of hitting that are very
remote.

So here is a scam you can test out at home.


Get 21 pennies, and a quarter.


Now get 3 pennies and the quarter ready. Put 2 pennies in a pile, and
one by itself.


If the quarter comes up heads move the penny by itself into the pile of

2, and tails you do the opposite.


The odds are 50% higher that you will win at roulette if you have the
pile of 2 pennies. And here is why. Because the extra pennie is a
freebie that your pretty girlfriend scored from some stooge playing
poker who was probably on a winning streak.


Now you can keep playing this game by adding a penny to each pile, and
the odds of you taking the whole pot continue to go down logically.
When you are playing 3 on 2, the odds of winning aren't 50% higher,
they are only 25% higher. And with each penny you add the odds go down

by half. Or something like that. You do the math.


But the more money your girlfriend hustles the greater your odds of
winning at roulette are. Or you could bring in fake chips yourself.
But the great thing is the more free chips your playing with, the more
of the casinos pot you have a good chance of raking in.


It doesn't matter, just always bet on black.


There are lots of other ways to get that "free penny" as well. Being
able to read good body language at a poker table gets you a free penny,

being a pretty girl gets you that extra, I'm going to overbet my bad
hand penny. You know


But the idea is that if you play the 50/50 game, and you always trying
to win just half of what you are willing to gamble, your odds improve
greatly.


2 against 1 , you have a 66% chance of winning


You win that pot


3 against 1, you have a 75% chance of winning


4 against 2, you have a 66% chance of winning.

So every time you win a pot you get a free penny!

And once you go up on a streak of luck like this, even when you start
to come down, you can continue going back up, and find a happy medium.
You just have to know when to quit, and know how to score those free
pennies. Just look at the whole pot that you have at the time as
something you are willing to risk to get whatever 'goal' you have at
the time.

Can you imagine what the odds would look like if you only go after one
penny as your goal? As the pile of pennies on your side keeps growing
larger, your odds go up exponentially after you reach each goal. But
obviously there is still a chance you will lose everything because you
are risking all of your pennies to win.

Now that this post is featured on JREF let me explain the math a little
bit more.

If I have 2 pennies and I want to start a chain reaction, in a 50/50
game, then I only go after one pennie at a time.

There are 3 ways the game can go, I can lose a penny, get it back, and
then score the penny that is my goal. Or I can win the penny right
off. Or I can lose completely.

So I have a 66.6% chance of winning

And now that I have 3 pennies and I go after one more penny, the odds
are 75% that I will win, because there are 3 ways I can win and 1 way I
can lose.

If I take the chance of playing these two games in a row, There are 7
ways I can win and 5 ways I can lose. So the chances of winning are
2/3 + 3/4 = 5/7. And that's 71.42857%

Which is a whole lot better than starting with 2 pennies and playing
against 2 pennies!!

It can only be explained as gravity, and astrological magnetism. Or
maybe, the butterfly effect?

I have been working on the theory too, and am willing to review your
ideas and help direct the project. Here is my idea so far...

You form a circle with 10 coins. And you form a smaller circle with 5
coins.

So according to my formula we have a 10/15 chance that the smaller
circle will gravitate to the larger circle, if the odds are 50/50 of it
moving in either direction.

But how do we tie this into our formula for gravity as it exists?

Distance between the two objects represents the actual probability.
Space time itself. So for example we can say that an object 10 light
years away has a reduced probability, than we do here on earth to the
earths gravitational pull.

The masses of the objects represent the coins themselves. Each coin is
like one atom. And as they move it represents how some of the atoms
are tugged in one direction or another, but are linked by the other
forces to the larger object they are appart of. So the whole object
moves in one direction or another.

The gravitational constant, is there to balance the equation, which as
it stands is different than the origonal formula, because the origonal
formula doesn't have a notion of which direction the objects are
headed, and just says they are equally attracted by a certain ammount
of force.

These are the ideas I would like you to work with!

purrcy wrote:
Gravity is a property of matter. Matter in motion also has a property
of gravity, but of a different nature than a stationary body. Gravity
has both components of the Lorentz Force, and the fields established by
matter, whether stationary or in motion, can be derived from Maxwell's
equations. Matter in motion, and photons, are vector potentials for
mass. Read http://savefile.com/projects/880850 to understand more about
this.



wrote:
Roulette is a 50/50 game if you are playing black vs red, except for
the one green slip of the wheel, but the odds of hitting that are very
remote.

So here is a scam you can test out at home.


Get 21 pennies, and a quarter.


Now get 3 pennies and the quarter ready. Put 2 pennies in a pile, and
one by itself.


If the quarter comes up heads move the penny by itself into the pile of

2, and tails you do the opposite.


The odds are 50% higher that you will win at roulette if you have the
pile of 2 pennies. And here is why. Because the extra pennie is a
freebie that your pretty girlfriend scored from some stooge playing
poker who was probably on a winning streak.


Now you can keep playing this game by adding a penny to each pile, and
the odds of you taking the whole pot continue to go down logically.
When you are playing 3 on 2, the odds of winning aren't 50% higher,
they are only 25% higher. And with each penny you add the odds go down

by half. Or something like that. You do the math.


But the more money your girlfriend hustles the greater your odds of
winning at roulette are. Or you could bring in fake chips yourself.
But the great thing is the more free chips your playing with, the more
of the casinos pot you have a good chance of raking in.


It doesn't matter, just always bet on black.


There are lots of other ways to get that "free penny" as well. Being
able to read good body language at a poker table gets you a free penny,

being a pretty girl gets you that extra, I'm going to overbet my bad
hand penny. You know


But the idea is that if you play the 50/50 game, and you always trying
to win just half of what you are willing to gamble, your odds improve
greatly.


2 against 1 , you have a 66% chance of winning


You win that pot


3 against 1, you have a 75% chance of winning


4 against 2, you have a 66% chance of winning.

So every time you win a pot you get a free penny!

And once you go up on a streak of luck like this, even when you start
to come down, you can continue going back up, and find a happy medium.
You just have to know when to quit, and know how to score those free
pennies. Just look at the whole pot that you have at the time as
something you are willing to risk to get whatever 'goal' you have at
the time.

Can you imagine what the odds would look like if you only go after one
penny as your goal? As the pile of pennies on your side keeps growing
larger, your odds go up exponentially after you reach each goal. But
obviously there is still a chance you will lose everything because you
are risking all of your pennies to win.

Now that this post is featured on JREF let me explain the math a little
bit more.

If I have 2 pennies and I want to start a chain reaction, in a 50/50
game, then I only go after one pennie at a time.

There are 3 ways the game can go, I can lose a penny, get it back, and
then score the penny that is my goal. Or I can win the penny right
off. Or I can lose completely.

So I have a 66.6% chance of winning

And now that I have 3 pennies and I go after one more penny, the odds
are 75% that I will win, because there are 3 ways I can win and 1 way I
can lose.

If I take the chance of playing these two games in a row, There are 7
ways I can win and 5 ways I can lose. So the chances of winning are
2/3 + 3/4 = 5/7. And that's 71.42857%

Which is a whole lot better than starting with 2 pennies and playing
against 2 pennies!!

It can only be explained as gravity, and astrological magnetism. Or
maybe, the butterfly effect?