A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA lost Apollo moon misssion records.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 15th 06, 08:30 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Sco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default NASA lost Apollo moon misssion records.

There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now
NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were lost.
No one can prove anyting any more.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original
recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's
famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA
spokesman said on Monday.

Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969,
is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of
searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said.

"We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a year
and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said.

The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the
condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from
the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon
landing -- 2:47)

"I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the
tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said.

NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several
clips on its Web site.

But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the
missing magnetic tapes.

Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day,
the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by a
TV camera for broadcast.

Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they are
found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a problem
common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media.

The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA sometime
in the late 1970s, he said.

"We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said.


  #2  
Old August 15th 06, 09:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default NASA lost Apollo moon misssion records.


Sco wrote:
There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now
NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were lost.
No one can prove anyting any more.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original
recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's
famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA
spokesman said on Monday.

Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969,
is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of
searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said.

"We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a year
and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said.

The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the
condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from
the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon
landing -- 2:47)

"I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the
tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said.

NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several
clips on its Web site.

But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the
missing magnetic tapes.

Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day,
the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by a
TV camera for broadcast.

Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they are
found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a problem
common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media.

The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA sometime
in the late 1970s, he said.

"We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said.




That's the way things go.

All information on the "original" Moon mission, the one involving the
giant cannon, were lost ages ago. The only remaining reference to be
found is in Jules Verne.

Double-A

  #3  
Old August 15th 06, 11:00 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hagar[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,309
Default NASA lost Apollo moon misssion records.


"Sco" wrote in message
. com...
There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now
NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were

lost.
No one can prove anyting any more.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original
recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's
famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA
spokesman said on Monday.

Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20,

1969,
is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of
searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said.

"We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a

year
and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said.

The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the
condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from
the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon
landing -- 2:47)

"I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the
tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said.

NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several
clips on its Web site.

But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the
missing magnetic tapes.

Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day,
the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by

a
TV camera for broadcast.

Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they

are
found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a

problem
common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media.

The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA

sometime
in the late 1970s, he said.

"We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said.



Oh boy, I just knew this would light the bonfires for a new round of
conspiracy nuts screed. You know, those loonies who swear we didn't make it
to the moon, it was all a fake, like a hooker's orgasm.


  #4  
Old August 16th 06, 12:28 AM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default NASA lost Apollo moon mission records.

Hagar (the horrible) It is hard for younger people that grew up with
the Mafia shuttles to think man walked on the moon. The saturn V was so
much more powerful. I was at some of its launches. I was also at some of
the shuttle launches.. Once the Ca. Mafia took over all the great brains
of Apollo were forced to leave. Two of the Saturn V that could be fired
also were retired. I could not believe what had happened and voiced my
opposition(as I always do) You can''[t fight the Mafia. It was money
period. 35 years latter proves that it is hard to believe the
brain power NASA had in the 60s and70s and honesty. There is now a
better chance of China having a take out Chinese restaurant on the Moon
than Nasa going back again. Sad but so very true

  #5  
Old August 16th 06, 03:11 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Sco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default NASA lost Apollo moon misssion records.

More research and analysis from expert:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...7128107&q=moon



"Sco" wrote in message
. com...
There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now
NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were
lost. No one can prove anyting any more.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original
recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's
famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA
spokesman said on Monday.

Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20,
1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of
searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said.

"We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a
year and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said.

The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the
condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from
the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon
landing -- 2:47)

"I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the
tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said.

NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several
clips on its Web site.

But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the
missing magnetic tapes.

Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day,
the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by
a TV camera for broadcast.

Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they
are found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a
problem common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media.

The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA
sometime in the late 1970s, he said.

"We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said.




  #6  
Old August 17th 06, 05:20 AM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sci.planetary,alt.astronomy.solar,rec.arts.tv
Alexmcw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default NASA Let's "Cat Out O' The Bag!" - Duped Astronomers "Devastated"


"Lie Detector" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, "Sco" wrote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has "misplaced" the original
recording of the first Area 51, NV "moon landing", including the infamous
astronaught "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind"
bogusness,
NASA's propaganda minister somberly admitted on Monday.

Armstrong's fuzzy made-for-television "moon walk" movie, seen by millions
of unsuspecting viewers on July 20, 1969, while jammin' to Jimi Hendrix
live,
is among the hoaxed "men-on-the-moon" video footage that proves NASA
failed
to actually send living men to the Moon and back almost four decades ago,
but had really made it all up in order to fool the public at large into
supporting NASA's confined to low-earth orbit "space monkey" program.

snipped for clarity


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Indeed NASA's going on four decades old and still counting
"men-to-the-moon" bogus fish story has long-since lost all
credibility. Anyone who believes they sent living men all
the way to the Moon and back nearly half a century ago is
hopelessly delusional. Better that they die in ignorance. :-D

So NASA's magically "losing" what were already nothing but
lamely fabricated tapes, images, etc. is only meaningless
drivel for the hopelessly brainwashed and mentally insane
(to wit the Liberal Atheist morons polluting the newsgroup
hierarchies, sci.*, alt.* ad nauseam; they're failed liars).

It's a proven fact NASA's six allegedly-manned half-million
miles per round-trip(!) missions to the Moon (1969-72) were
at best unmanned flights in competition with the U.S.S.R.'s
contemporaneous Soviet Luna/Lunakhod unmanned Moon missions.

"They couldn't make it so they faked it." Thus, the "manned"
portions of the missions were actually filmed under the top-
secret, heavily-guarded domed soundstages in the high desert
of Area 51, NV, perhaps around Pine Gap, AUS and maybe other
remote and publicly-inaccessible locations around the world.
__________________________________________________

Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
buggies & actors running along in their deflated
monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
brazenly obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
__________________________________________________

Here it is 2006, and NASA *still* has enough headaches trying
to cope with the challenges (remember the Challenger shuttle?)
of low-earth orbit manned spacecraft. But things were "easier"
generations ago, back in the bygone era of sliderules, hippies
and flower children. Yupp! Back then, the laws of physics were
a lot easier to deal with than they are now and that's obvious.
Our technology was far more advanced back then, than it is now.

The Moon is FAR BEYOND the reach of manned spacecraft, to wit:

ALTITUDE COMPARISON CHART
SHUTTLE VS. MOON & MANMADE SATELLITES
(not to scale)

x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| |
| |
| |
| |
~ ~214,000 MILES ~
~ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ~
| |
| |
| |
x------High-altitude orbit ~25,000+ miles altitude------x
| |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x
x------JPL/NASA Space Shuttle orbit ~300 miles altitude-x
x------Intl. Space Station orbit ~220 miles altitude |
x------Earth's sea level -0- miles altitude-------------x


To give you an idea of the scale involved, if each hard line
break in the chart below equals roughly 10,000 miles, to wit:

x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| 230,000 |
| 220,000 |
| 210,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 190,000 |
| 180,000 |
| 170,000 |
| 160,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 140,000 |
| 130,000 |
| 120,000 |
| 110,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 80,000 |
| 70,000 |
| 60,000 |
| 50,000 |
| 40,000 |
| 30,000 |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x

Thus the low-earth shuttle orbit would fit somewhere between
the center and baseline of the bottom 'x'--hardly visible at
all at this scale. And yet, that is the highest altitude any
manned flight has ever successfully sustained for any length
of time. But the "men to the moon" fairytale devotees don't
want to face up to these and other glaring facts in evidence:

*Altitude Comparison Chart of Shuttle vs. Moon & Manmade Satellites:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...814.6969560185 AT
anonymous.poster

*Apollo Moon Missions 1969-1972 Were At Best *Unmanned*:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...500.9704861111 AT
Gilgamesh-frog.org

*Quasi-Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...499.1691435185 AT
Gilgamesh-frog.org

Remember, because this particular evidence regarding the laser
reflectors (which are indisputably on the surface of the Moon)
has been repeatedly cited as "proof" that living human beings
have actually been to the Moon and back (i.e., only by badly-
educated nitwits who were duped by NASA's propaganda machine),
but were in reality *unmanned* missions at best that occurred
nearly FOUR DECADES ago, I'll briefly address this issue one
more time for the benefit of conscientious lurkers out the

http://www.aerospaceguide.net/spacecraft/lunakhod.html
"Lunokhod 1 was the first successful Soviet remote-
controlled moon rover that was carried to the Moon
by Luna 17. It was launched November 10, 1970. The
rover had eight wheels.
"The Luna 17 spacecraft landed on the moon on November
17, 1970. Lunokhod 1 weighed just under 2,000 pounds
and was designed to operate for 90 days while guided
by a 5-person team. Lunokhod 1 explored the Mare
Imbrium for 11 months and traveled 11km and relayed
television pictures and scientific data.
Lunokhod 2 moon rover was an improved version of
Lunokhod 1. It was carried to the moon on Luna 21
and landed on January 16, 1973. Lunokhod 2 was faster
and carried an additional television camera. It
travelled 37km in only 8 weeks." [end quote]

http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod1.htm
"Lunokhod 1 went to the Moon aboard Luna 17. Its
eight wire-mesh wheels each has its own electric
motor to allow manoeuvring in tight spaces, and so
failure of a single motor did not prevent it from
moving.
The lidded box at the left is a French-built laser
reflector. It was used to reflect back to Earth a
laser beam, making it possible to measure the
distance between the Earth and Moon to an accuracy
of twenty to thirty centimetres" [end quote]

http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod2.htm
"There is an additional high-level TV camera for
panoramic photography, and all lenses have
improved sunshades.
The small silver box between the front wheels is
an alpha particle emitter which can be lowered
onto the Moon to measure soil composition. Like
its predecessor, Lunokhod 2 carries a French
retro-reflector for use with a laser beam
transmitted from Earth. It allows the Earth-Moon
distance to be measured to an accuracy around 20
centimetres.

http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Luna16.htm
"the cone-shaped antenna keeps communication with
Earth while the drill arm sits in its rest position
on the right. The sample will be taken by rotating
the drill head by one hundred and eighty degrees,
lowering the drill arm to the surface and extracting
a core sample.
On returning to the rest position, the sample is
transferred to the return capsule and sent back to
Earth" [end quote]

Therefore the Soviet Lunokhod I/II-Luna XVII/XXI missions
both successfully landed their unmanned remote-controlled
lunar-rovers a.k.a. dune-buggies on the Moon: in the same
time frame as the alleged "apollo" missions were supposed
to have occurred. These remote-controlled Russian buggies
placed French- made laser reflectors on the Moon! Another
Soviet unmanned mission, Luna XVI, landed on the Moon and
returned a soil sample to the Earth by September 24, 1970:
from the Moon, unmanned, programmed and remote-controlled.

So laser-reflecting corner prisms were placed on the Moon
by unmanned probes and a 100g x 35 cm soil sample drilled
out from the lunar surface was sent back to Earth by this
earlier of these unmanned missions all in the early 1970s.
This completely and absolutely destroys any argument that
lunar soil samples or lunar laser reflectors "prove" that
men were on the Moon. Rather, as with all other evidences
cited allegedly supporting of the "apollo" missions, upon
precise examination the same evidence proves at least the
"manned" portions of these apollo missions were definitely
hoaxed. Men NEVER went to the Moon, because men have NEVER
achieved and survived sustained altitudes much above about
five or six hundred miles above Earth's sea level. Got it?
Remember, the Moon is almost a quarter million miles away--
that's *HALF A MILLION MILES ROUND TRIP*! Get the picture?

By contrast, the Russians proved that they did send their
unmanned probes to the Moon to wit: the presence of laser
reflectors left thereon by the aforesaid Lunokhod buggies.
It could be argued that the lunar soil samples were faked
somehow, but laser reflecting corner cubes are irrefutable
evidence that unmanned robotic probes put them there. See?

At least, the demonstrable presence of the "apollo" laser
reflectors proves the American space program successfully
sent some UNMANNED probes to the Moon -and- has continued
to launch many unmanned instruments into space ever since.
All these missions are UNMANNED. Why? The Sun, that's why.
That's why they NEVER send men into outer space. Not once.
Otherwise, they'd fry to a crisp in the intense radiation.

Far Out Man! Groovy! Heavy! Outta Sight! Dig It Baby!
Daniel Joseph Min
__________________________________________________ _______

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

*Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...786.0401967593 AT
anonymous.poster

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...262.9022453704 AT
anonymous.poster

*Min's Official PGP Public Key (MIT Keyserver compromised):

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...stycreek.c om
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...919.8812962963 AT
twistycreek.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBROIvBJljD7YrHM/nEQILbwCfcqu0wzpONXn6AS0xqklz/BHltdQAnijb
4AByOR8VXT1/UbG/Wyr7Idow
=jN1C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


You are living in la-la land.


  #7  
Old August 17th 06, 08:14 AM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sci.planetary,alt.astronomy.solar,rec.arts.tv
Mark Nobles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default NASA Let's "Cat Out O' The Bag!" - Duped Astronomers "Devastated"

Alexmcw wrote:

You are living in la-la land.


Sweet zombie Jesus. You had to quote 284 lines of Min bull**** to post
this? Learn to trim.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Early NASA PDFs Rusty History 48 June 13th 06 05:51 AM
Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths? Imperishable Stars Misc 46 October 8th 04 04:08 PM
Apollo Buzz alDredge UK Astronomy 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The apollo faq the inquirer Misc 4 April 15th 04 04:45 AM
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) Nathan Jones UK Astronomy 8 February 4th 04 06:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.