![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now
NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were lost. No one can prove anyting any more. WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday. Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said. "We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a year and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said. The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon landing -- 2:47) "I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said. NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several clips on its Web site. But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the missing magnetic tapes. Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day, the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by a TV camera for broadcast. Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they are found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a problem common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media. The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA sometime in the late 1970s, he said. "We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sco wrote: There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were lost. No one can prove anyting any more. WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday. Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said. "We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a year and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said. The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon landing -- 2:47) "I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said. NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several clips on its Web site. But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the missing magnetic tapes. Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day, the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by a TV camera for broadcast. Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they are found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a problem common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media. The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA sometime in the late 1970s, he said. "We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said. That's the way things go. All information on the "original" Moon mission, the one involving the giant cannon, were lost ages ago. The only remaining reference to be found is in Jules Verne. Double-A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sco" wrote in message . com... There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were lost. No one can prove anyting any more. WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday. Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said. "We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a year and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said. The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon landing -- 2:47) "I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said. NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several clips on its Web site. But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the missing magnetic tapes. Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day, the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by a TV camera for broadcast. Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they are found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a problem common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media. The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA sometime in the late 1970s, he said. "We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said. Oh boy, I just knew this would light the bonfires for a new round of conspiracy nuts screed. You know, those loonies who swear we didn't make it to the moon, it was all a fake, like a hooker's orgasm. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hagar (the horrible) It is hard for younger people that grew up with
the Mafia shuttles to think man walked on the moon. The saturn V was so much more powerful. I was at some of its launches. I was also at some of the shuttle launches.. Once the Ca. Mafia took over all the great brains of Apollo were forced to leave. Two of the Saturn V that could be fired also were retired. I could not believe what had happened and voiced my opposition(as I always do) You can''[t fight the Mafia. It was money period. 35 years latter proves that it is hard to believe the brain power NASA had in the 60s and70s and honesty. There is now a better chance of China having a take out Chinese restaurant on the Moon than Nasa going back again. Sad but so very true |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More research and analysis from expert:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...7128107&q=moon "Sco" wrote in message . com... There are many conspiracy theories that NASA didn't step on the moon. Now NASA told everyone that the original Apollo moon mission records were lost. No one can prove anyting any more. WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday. Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said. "We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a year and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said. The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said. (Watch the first moon landing -- 2:47) "I wouldn't say we're worried -- we've got all the data. Everything on the tapes we have in one form or another," Hautaloma said. NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several clips on its Web site. But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the missing magnetic tapes. Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day, the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by a TV camera for broadcast. Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they are found, because they have degraded significantly over the years -- a problem common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media. The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA sometime in the late 1970s, he said. "We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were," he said. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lie Detector" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, "Sco" wrote: WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has "misplaced" the original recording of the first Area 51, NV "moon landing", including the infamous astronaught "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" bogusness, NASA's propaganda minister somberly admitted on Monday. Armstrong's fuzzy made-for-television "moon walk" movie, seen by millions of unsuspecting viewers on July 20, 1969, while jammin' to Jimi Hendrix live, is among the hoaxed "men-on-the-moon" video footage that proves NASA failed to actually send living men to the Moon and back almost four decades ago, but had really made it all up in order to fool the public at large into supporting NASA's confined to low-earth orbit "space monkey" program. snipped for clarity -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Indeed NASA's going on four decades old and still counting "men-to-the-moon" bogus fish story has long-since lost all credibility. Anyone who believes they sent living men all the way to the Moon and back nearly half a century ago is hopelessly delusional. Better that they die in ignorance. :-D So NASA's magically "losing" what were already nothing but lamely fabricated tapes, images, etc. is only meaningless drivel for the hopelessly brainwashed and mentally insane (to wit the Liberal Atheist morons polluting the newsgroup hierarchies, sci.*, alt.* ad nauseam; they're failed liars). It's a proven fact NASA's six allegedly-manned half-million miles per round-trip(!) missions to the Moon (1969-72) were at best unmanned flights in competition with the U.S.S.R.'s contemporaneous Soviet Luna/Lunakhod unmanned Moon missions. "They couldn't make it so they faked it." Thus, the "manned" portions of the missions were actually filmed under the top- secret, heavily-guarded domed soundstages in the high desert of Area 51, NV, perhaps around Pine Gap, AUS and maybe other remote and publicly-inaccessible locations around the world. __________________________________________________ Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand buggies & actors running along in their deflated monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film, conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly silent running under invisible exhaust emissions, brazenly obvious backdrops that contrast sharply against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc. __________________________________________________ Here it is 2006, and NASA *still* has enough headaches trying to cope with the challenges (remember the Challenger shuttle?) of low-earth orbit manned spacecraft. But things were "easier" generations ago, back in the bygone era of sliderules, hippies and flower children. Yupp! Back then, the laws of physics were a lot easier to deal with than they are now and that's obvious. Our technology was far more advanced back then, than it is now. The Moon is FAR BEYOND the reach of manned spacecraft, to wit: ALTITUDE COMPARISON CHART SHUTTLE VS. MOON & MANMADE SATELLITES (not to scale) x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x | | | | | | | | ~ ~214,000 MILES ~ ~ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ~ | | | | | | x------High-altitude orbit ~25,000+ miles altitude------x | | x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x | | | | ~ ~10,000 MILES ~ ~ ~ | | x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x | | | | ~ ~10,000 MILES ~ ~ ~ | | x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x x------JPL/NASA Space Shuttle orbit ~300 miles altitude-x x------Intl. Space Station orbit ~220 miles altitude | x------Earth's sea level -0- miles altitude-------------x To give you an idea of the scale involved, if each hard line break in the chart below equals roughly 10,000 miles, to wit: x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x | 230,000 | | 220,000 | | 210,000 | | 200,000 | | 190,000 | | 180,000 | | 170,000 | | 160,000 | | 150,000 | | 140,000 | | 130,000 | | 120,000 | | 110,000 | | 100,000 | | 90,000 | | 80,000 | | 70,000 | | 60,000 | | 50,000 | | 40,000 | | 30,000 | x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x Thus the low-earth shuttle orbit would fit somewhere between the center and baseline of the bottom 'x'--hardly visible at all at this scale. And yet, that is the highest altitude any manned flight has ever successfully sustained for any length of time. But the "men to the moon" fairytale devotees don't want to face up to these and other glaring facts in evidence: *Altitude Comparison Chart of Shuttle vs. Moon & Manmade Satellites: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...814.6969560185 AT anonymous.poster *Apollo Moon Missions 1969-1972 Were At Best *Unmanned*: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...500.9704861111 AT Gilgamesh-frog.org *Quasi-Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...499.1691435185 AT Gilgamesh-frog.org Remember, because this particular evidence regarding the laser reflectors (which are indisputably on the surface of the Moon) has been repeatedly cited as "proof" that living human beings have actually been to the Moon and back (i.e., only by badly- educated nitwits who were duped by NASA's propaganda machine), but were in reality *unmanned* missions at best that occurred nearly FOUR DECADES ago, I'll briefly address this issue one more time for the benefit of conscientious lurkers out the http://www.aerospaceguide.net/spacecraft/lunakhod.html "Lunokhod 1 was the first successful Soviet remote- controlled moon rover that was carried to the Moon by Luna 17. It was launched November 10, 1970. The rover had eight wheels. "The Luna 17 spacecraft landed on the moon on November 17, 1970. Lunokhod 1 weighed just under 2,000 pounds and was designed to operate for 90 days while guided by a 5-person team. Lunokhod 1 explored the Mare Imbrium for 11 months and traveled 11km and relayed television pictures and scientific data. Lunokhod 2 moon rover was an improved version of Lunokhod 1. It was carried to the moon on Luna 21 and landed on January 16, 1973. Lunokhod 2 was faster and carried an additional television camera. It travelled 37km in only 8 weeks." [end quote] http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod1.htm "Lunokhod 1 went to the Moon aboard Luna 17. Its eight wire-mesh wheels each has its own electric motor to allow manoeuvring in tight spaces, and so failure of a single motor did not prevent it from moving. The lidded box at the left is a French-built laser reflector. It was used to reflect back to Earth a laser beam, making it possible to measure the distance between the Earth and Moon to an accuracy of twenty to thirty centimetres" [end quote] http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod2.htm "There is an additional high-level TV camera for panoramic photography, and all lenses have improved sunshades. The small silver box between the front wheels is an alpha particle emitter which can be lowered onto the Moon to measure soil composition. Like its predecessor, Lunokhod 2 carries a French retro-reflector for use with a laser beam transmitted from Earth. It allows the Earth-Moon distance to be measured to an accuracy around 20 centimetres. http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Luna16.htm "the cone-shaped antenna keeps communication with Earth while the drill arm sits in its rest position on the right. The sample will be taken by rotating the drill head by one hundred and eighty degrees, lowering the drill arm to the surface and extracting a core sample. On returning to the rest position, the sample is transferred to the return capsule and sent back to Earth" [end quote] Therefore the Soviet Lunokhod I/II-Luna XVII/XXI missions both successfully landed their unmanned remote-controlled lunar-rovers a.k.a. dune-buggies on the Moon: in the same time frame as the alleged "apollo" missions were supposed to have occurred. These remote-controlled Russian buggies placed French- made laser reflectors on the Moon! Another Soviet unmanned mission, Luna XVI, landed on the Moon and returned a soil sample to the Earth by September 24, 1970: from the Moon, unmanned, programmed and remote-controlled. So laser-reflecting corner prisms were placed on the Moon by unmanned probes and a 100g x 35 cm soil sample drilled out from the lunar surface was sent back to Earth by this earlier of these unmanned missions all in the early 1970s. This completely and absolutely destroys any argument that lunar soil samples or lunar laser reflectors "prove" that men were on the Moon. Rather, as with all other evidences cited allegedly supporting of the "apollo" missions, upon precise examination the same evidence proves at least the "manned" portions of these apollo missions were definitely hoaxed. Men NEVER went to the Moon, because men have NEVER achieved and survived sustained altitudes much above about five or six hundred miles above Earth's sea level. Got it? Remember, the Moon is almost a quarter million miles away-- that's *HALF A MILLION MILES ROUND TRIP*! Get the picture? By contrast, the Russians proved that they did send their unmanned probes to the Moon to wit: the presence of laser reflectors left thereon by the aforesaid Lunokhod buggies. It could be argued that the lunar soil samples were faked somehow, but laser reflecting corner cubes are irrefutable evidence that unmanned robotic probes put them there. See? At least, the demonstrable presence of the "apollo" laser reflectors proves the American space program successfully sent some UNMANNED probes to the Moon -and- has continued to launch many unmanned instruments into space ever since. All these missions are UNMANNED. Why? The Sun, that's why. That's why they NEVER send men into outer space. Not once. Otherwise, they'd fry to a crisp in the intense radiation. Far Out Man! Groovy! Heavy! Outta Sight! Dig It Baby! Daniel Joseph Min __________________________________________________ _______ *Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books: http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/ *Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really): http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...786.0401967593 AT anonymous.poster *Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...262.9022453704 AT anonymous.poster *Min's Official PGP Public Key (MIT Keyserver compromised): http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...stycreek.c om http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...919.8812962963 AT twistycreek.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBROIvBJljD7YrHM/nEQILbwCfcqu0wzpONXn6AS0xqklz/BHltdQAnijb 4AByOR8VXT1/UbG/Wyr7Idow =jN1C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- You are living in la-la land. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alexmcw wrote:
You are living in la-la land. Sweet zombie Jesus. You had to quote 284 lines of Min bull**** to post this? Learn to trim. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Early NASA PDFs | Rusty | History | 48 | June 13th 06 05:51 AM |
Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths? | Imperishable Stars | Misc | 46 | October 8th 04 04:08 PM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Misc | 4 | April 15th 04 04:45 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |