The 'Michelson and Morley religion' - Carl Sagan, the deceased science "educator" and TV personality, is a Criminal Mind

The 'Michelson and Morley religion' - Carl Sagan, the deceased
science "educator" and TV personality, is a Criminal Mind

12 August 2006

'

It isn't, that 'he, Carl Sagan, does not know' - IT IS, that

'he WANTS that YOU do not know.'

And he, Carl Sagan, states this very clearly in the
beginning of his autobiography, describing his youth
experiences.

'

It isn't, that 'he does not know' (as I did somewhat suggest before,
that that would be the case with him, Carl Sagan, that he simply
does not know) but

- IT IS, that 'he, Carl Sagan, WANTS that YOU do NOT know (as
I implied before, but did not completely voice).'

'

'

He knew and experienced truth very well, as a youth

- and THEN he set out, as so many before him, to take upon him
as his life's goal, to deny it,

a denial which of course includes

"teaching" others to ALSO deny what he knew very well and
had experienced to be true, which means,

to make as many people as possible desire to listen,
including you and me, of course, and then,

"teaching" that many others, and you and me, ALSO to
deny that, what he knew very well and had experienced to
exist and be true,

which is also the "reason" (the hidden motive) of all other
'gurus':

THEY TEACH to enforce what you will NOT LOOK AT,

as the intelligent, attentive and faithful
reader already knows (that I uncovered that
intention of 'gurus').

'

Such is the nature of Criminal Minds.

This he, Carl Sagan, hides by

(much like all other quacks and charlatans, like James Randi
etc. hide it too)

calling it - clamoring very loudly, that their and his own hiding
and denying the most essential facts and observations, is - "true
science,"

or the 'religion of Michelson and Morley,'

the two "scientists" Michelson and Morley that you
find in your physics school text books,

who set out to "prove" to the 'scientific community'
promoting in all school and text books, and in the
'"Scientific" American' magazine, "proving"

by the use of a set of fixed mirrors,

that "Life Energy Particles do not exist,"

much like stage magicians "prove," that "things
disappear."

'

And this - completely and INTENTIONALLY denying all
essential and known and recorded facts and observations,
they pronounced to be

"science" - the 'religion of Michelson and Morley'

which, as you know, has some very famous
followers,

who are considered by you to have a "high"
IQ - higher than you, even.

'

'

And of course you, much like I myself, have swallowed it all,

- "because it is so well and so smoothly and so convincingly
presented"

- "because he looks so friendly," "it feels as sympathetic as
Osama bin Laden himself"

(these use in their mask, and as their mask, the Energy
stolen from decent, caring people, so they LOOK caring
and friendly to you - it is their MASK, as you know
by now from the deeds and words of Osama bin Laden)

yes, you even paid for his, Carl Sagan's books and (if you are a
producer etc.) for his TV series

- suggesting your Intelligence Quotient currently to be well
BELOW two hundred.

'

'

Following are the rights you should grant to Criminal Minds, also
to those in 'science.'

'

Rights Of Criminal Minds

8 January 2004
{HRI 20040108-V1.0.1}

(Version 1.0.1
on 12 Nov 2005)

'

1. Criminal Minds have the right to be looked at. *(1),*(2),*(3),*(4)

'

2. Criminal Minds have the right to be exposed. *(5),*(6),*(7),*(8)

'

These are kind (nice, friendly, caring) things to do to
a Criminal Mind.

On the other hand, to NOT look at him or her and to NOT
expose him or her, is a very mean thing to do to a
Criminal Mind.

They ARE that mean, intentionally that mean, to
each other (and to themselves too);

they do so in order to deliberately let others be
more evil, to thereby deliberately let others
degrade themselves even further by doing more evil,
and

they do so by intending neither to expose nor to
stop the evil activities of other Criminal Minds.

This then gives them as well their desired feeling
of 'looking down' on other Criminal Minds.

'

3. Criminal Minds have the right not to be hated by normal people.

'

You can however not demand or ask of other Criminal Minds
not to hate them, because that's what Criminal Minds do,
they are always Hating:

They are Hating, and hiding that they are Hating,
and they are sometimes pretending to care in order
to camouflage and so exert the control in order to
Hate in a hidden manner. *(9)

So, telling Criminal Minds not to Hate, is as useless as
telling a pig not to eat -

he (or she) won't be able to follow your request
and he (or she) will only pretend to comply,
pretending it

by deceiving you and others, by creating a
pretended personality as himself or as herself,
that he or she even believes in,
*(3),*(10),*(16)

by preventing you from seeing or from
understanding his or her activities of Hating.
*(6)
'

Normal people should not Hate Criminal Minds,

no matter how much a Criminal Mind begs or goads (teases)
normal people into being Hateful as well - even to the
Criminal Mind -

that is, a Criminal Mind will try to get normal
people into radiating Hate as well, into being for
some time like a Criminal Mind, and even into a
state of wanting to destroy a Criminal Mind further.
*(11)

'

4. Criminal Minds must not be in a position where other people or
children are forced or asked to depend on some of the judgments
of a Criminal Mind about them or to have to somehow follow the
directions of a Criminal Mind, or the directions from Destructive
Cowards who are the underlings of a Criminal Mind. *(12)

'

5. Criminal Minds may be asked to leave a location.

That may be necessary in order to protect others, or to
maintain somewhere an atmosphere of understanding and
perception necessary for

(sometimes even the basic needs such as food and
shelter and communication and decency, of)

life to restore and grow and be healthy and joyful.
*(13),*(14),*(15)


Koos Nolst Trenite "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet

'All the kings of the earth
sought audience with Solomon
to hear the wisdom
God had put in his heart.'

2 Chronicles 9:23

_________
Footnotes (Updated on 12 Nov 2005):

[ see also:
'Checklist of Human Rights Issues with newest versions
up to 3 August 2006'
{HRI update list 20060803}
(3 August 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...8f2f24c9?fwc=1
]

(1) 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Psychosis'
{HRI 20030227-V2.2} (27 Feb 2003 - Version 2.2 on 23 Jan 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...702cebcf?fwc=1

(2) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty (Version 2.1)
{HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}' (7 March 2003 - V2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...1a67840e?fwc=1

(3) 'Criminal Minds ENJOY LYING, And THEY Know They Intentionally Lie'
{HRI 20050527-V3.5} (27 May 2005 - Version 3.5 on 10 June 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/hu...aae92dcf?fwc=1

(4) 'On Those Who Want Awareness Not Understood' {HRI 20030416-V1.0}
(16 April 2003 - Version 1.0)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...8fc938c0?fwc=1

(5) 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Vital
Truth' {HRI 20020819-V2.2.3}
(19 August 2002 - Version 2.2.3 on 12 May 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/ta...3ef36240?fwc=1

(6) 'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' {HRI 20030509-V3.1}
(9 May 2003 - Version 3.1 on 2 Dec 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...a4cbf0b3?fcw=1

(7) 'Understanding Eternal Criminally Minded Individuals'
{HRI 20031124} (24 November 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...32b5b016?fwc=1

(8) 'Two More Tools To Detect Criminal Minds' {HRI 20030716}
(16 July 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...8ab01b75?fwc=1

(9) 'Defining Love And Hate - A Law Of Life' V2.0i
(29 July 2002 - Version 2.0i on 7 January 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/Ko...cadc84b1?fwc=1

(10) 'Theory Of Repairing Criminal Minds' (13 Dec 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...a55476cd?fwc=1

(11) 'Definition Of Schizophrenic' {HR 20021125} (25 Nov 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...e2a0b84d?fwc=1

(12) 'The First International Law' (Version 2.0) {HRI 20021124-V2.0}
(24 November 2002 - Version 2.0 on 23 Sept 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...b1678b70?fwc=1

(13) 'Understanding Of Those Who Harm Life
- Criminal Minds Radiate Lies' {HRI 20030611-II}
(11 June 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...e57b8edf?fwc=1

(14) 'Defining The Major Harmful Or Bad Energies
- As They Are Created And Projected By Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20030611} (11 June 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...b3548129?fwc=1

(15) (nn) 'Not WHY Is There Suffering, But WHO Causes It - Is The
Question'
{HRI 20030610} (10 June 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...105d28ba?fwc=1

(16) 'Genuine Art - Producing It, Recognizing It' {HRI 20021220}
(20 Dec 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...c08294fb?fwc=1
'

____________
Verification:

http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2004-2006 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)

"Koos Nolst Trenite" wrote in message
oups.com...
The 'Michelson and Morley religion' - Carl Sagan, the deceased
science "educator" and TV personality, is a Criminal Mind


Wow. Just, wow. This takes kookery to a new and unexplored level. Min has
some catching up to do.

Koos Nolst Trenite wrote:
The 'Michelson and Morley religion' - Carl Sagan, the deceased
science "educator" and TV personality, is a Criminal Mind


blah, blah, blah

- suggesting your Intelligence Quotient currently to be well
BELOW two hundred.

I'll take it.

'Einstein blocked the way forward'

13 August 2006

'

By chance, I happen to read today, just now, what is interestingly
applicable, and

so that you hear it also from someone else,

who, via quite another way, came to the very same conclusions,

I quote:

'

'


From Mr. Aspden Research Papers, No. 5 (2005)

"TESLA VERSUS EINSTEIN © H. Aspden, 2005 Introduction

"As we celebrate Einstein in the centenary year since he introduced his
Theory of Relativity, there are those of us who see little to celebrate
because we believe that Einstein blocked the way forward in our quest
to tap energy from the aether.

'

"The aether is the energy source accounting for the creation of our
universe but Einstein's theory caused scientists to replace the aether
by abstract mathematical notions. Hence there has been no acceptance of
the aether as a possible new energy source, needed as our oil reserves
are eroded.

'

"It is timely, therefore, to review the claim made by Nikola Tesla,
that he had devised and constructed an automobile that was powered on
aether energy.

'

"Some Quotations:

'Whereas the general public, including almost all of the scientific
community, accept Einstein's theory without question, essentially
because that has become the popular opinion in the light of E = Mc2
having significance connected with the atomic bomb, that formula
relating energy E and mass M by the speed of light in vacuum is easily
derived without any use of Einstein's doctrines. See my monograph
entitled 'Physics without Einstein: A Centenary Review' which is of
record on my website www.aspden.org However, I am not the only one who
regards Einstein's theory as an obstruction rather than an aid in our
understanding of fundamental energy science. The following quotations
therefore seem appropriate as an introduction to what follows. 'Tesla
maintained his belief in the aether as the source of all substance.
This, he thought, was the fundamental, unifying theory of physical
things. He was quite unable to accept Einstein's theory of relativity
and curved space.'
'The Secret of the Creative Vacuum' by John Davidson [1]

'

'There is incontrovertible evidence, for example, from a number of
sources, that neither the gravitational 'constant' nor the speed of
light in a vacuum are constant after all. Since Einstein's theory of
relativity is founded upon these two assumptions, if either one of them
is shown to be incorrect, then Einstein's theory is seen to be more
relative than he thought! In short, like Newton's observations, it
would be wrong, as a fundamental model.'
'The Secret of the Creative Vacuum' by John Davidson [2]

'

'It may come as a shock, but Einstein's theory of relativity is not
part of the design of nuclear weapons! ...... High school science
students are conditioned to ridicule the concept of a
nineteenth-century luminiferous aether with eye-rolling and giggling.
But is this a contemptible idea when Aspden Research Papers, No. 5
(2005) 2 compared with the "new and improved" terminology of
gravitational masses "warping" the fabric of "space-time"?
'A Dissident View of Relativity Theory' by W.H.Cantrell [3]

'

'Einstein plagiarized the work of several notable scientists in his
1905 papers on special relativity and E = Mc2, yet the physics
community has never bothered to set the record straight in the past
century.'
'Albert Einstein: Plagiarist of the Century' by Richard Moody, Jr.
[4]

'

'Insofar as the theory is thought to explain the result of the
Michelson Morley experiment, I am inclined to agree with Soddy, that it
is a swindle; and I do not think [physicist] Rutherford would have
regarded it as a joke, had he realized how it would retard the rational
development of science'.
'Relativity - Joke or Swindle?' by L. Essen [5]

'

"Since Einstein is acclaimed for the scientific achievement of
upsetting our understanding of time itself, it is an interesting
observation, that the 20th century gave birth to one of the greatest
inventions ever made concerning clocks.

"It was that of Dr. Essen, the Director of the Time and Frequency
Division of Britain's National Physical Laboratory. He invented the
atomic clock and so ought to be an authority on the measurement of
time.

"That last quotation was by Dr. Essen. Somehow scientists say they can
verify Einstein's theory by conveying atomic clocks around the Earth in
aircraft but nowhere in their analysis of their experimental findings
do they show in truly physical terms how acceleration affects the
rhythm of electron motion in the atom.

"It is no wonder therefore that Dr. Essen was outspoken concerning his
DISBELIEF in Einstein's doctrines."

___________
Quoted from:
Aspden Research Papers, No. 5 (2005) - 'TESLA VERSUS EINSTEIN'
© H. Aspden, 2005

____________
Verification:

http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2006 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)


Koos Nolst Trenite wrote:
The 'Michelson and Morley religion' - Carl Sagan, the deceased
science "educator" and TV personality, is a Criminal Mind

12 August 2006

'

It isn't, that 'he, Carl Sagan, does not know' - IT IS, that

'he WANTS that YOU do not know.'

And he, Carl Sagan, states this very clearly in the
beginning of his autobiography, describing his youth
experiences.

'

It isn't, that 'he does not know' (as I did somewhat suggest before,
that that would be the case with him, Carl Sagan, that he simply
does not know) but

- IT IS, that 'he, Carl Sagan, WANTS that YOU do NOT know (as
I implied before, but did not completely voice).'

'

'

He knew and experienced truth very well, as a youth

- and THEN he set out, as so many before him, to take upon him
as his life's goal, to deny it,

a denial which of course includes

"teaching" others to ALSO deny what he knew very well and
had experienced to be true, which means,

to make as many people as possible desire to listen,
including you and me, of course, and then,

"teaching" that many others, and you and me, ALSO to
deny that, what he knew very well and had experienced to
exist and be true,

which is also the "reason" (the hidden motive) of all other
'gurus':

THEY TEACH to enforce what you will NOT LOOK AT,

as the intelligent, attentive and faithful
reader already knows (that I uncovered that
intention of 'gurus').

'

Such is the nature of Criminal Minds.

This he, Carl Sagan, hides by

(much like all other quacks and charlatans, like James Randi
etc. hide it too)

calling it - clamoring very loudly, that their and his own hiding
and denying the most essential facts and observations, is - "true
science,"

or the 'religion of Michelson and Morley,'

the two "scientists" Michelson and Morley that you
find in your physics school text books,

who set out to "prove" to the 'scientific community'
promoting in all school and text books, and in the
'"Scientific" American' magazine, "proving"

by the use of a set of fixed mirrors,

that "Life Energy Particles do not exist,"

much like stage magicians "prove," that "things
disappear."

'

And this - completely and INTENTIONALLY denying all
essential and known and recorded facts and observations,
they pronounced to be

"science" - the 'religion of Michelson and Morley'

which, as you know, has some very famous
followers,

who are considered by you to have a "high"
IQ - higher than you, even.

'

'

And of course you, much like I myself, have swallowed it all,

- "because it is so well and so smoothly and so convincingly
presented"

- "because he looks so friendly," "it feels as sympathetic as
Osama bin Laden himself"

(these use in their mask, and as their mask, the Energy
stolen from decent, caring people, so they LOOK caring
and friendly to you - it is their MASK, as you know
by now from the deeds and words of Osama bin Laden)

yes, you even paid for his, Carl Sagan's books and (if you are a
producer etc.) for his TV series

- suggesting your Intelligence Quotient currently to be well
BELOW two hundred.

'

'

Following are the rights you should grant to Criminal Minds, also
to those in 'science.'

'

Rights Of Criminal Minds

8 January 2004
{HRI 20040108-V1.0.1}

(Version 1.0.1
on 12 Nov 2005)

'

1. Criminal Minds have the right to be looked at. *(1),*(2),*(3),*(4)

'

2. Criminal Minds have the right to be exposed. *(5),*(6),*(7),*(8)

'

These are kind (nice, friendly, caring) things to do to
a Criminal Mind.

On the other hand, to NOT look at him or her and to NOT
expose him or her, is a very mean thing to do to a
Criminal Mind.

They ARE that mean, intentionally that mean, to
each other (and to themselves too);

they do so in order to deliberately let others be
more evil, to thereby deliberately let others
degrade themselves even further by doing more evil,
and

they do so by intending neither to expose nor to
stop the evil activities of other Criminal Minds.

This then gives them as well their desired feeling
of 'looking down' on other Criminal Minds.

'

3. Criminal Minds have the right not to be hated by normal people.

'

You can however not demand or ask of other Criminal Minds
not to hate them, because that's what Criminal Minds do,
they are always Hating:

They are Hating, and hiding that they are Hating,
and they are sometimes pretending to care in order
to camouflage and so exert the control in order to
Hate in a hidden manner. *(9)

So, telling Criminal Minds not to Hate, is as useless as
telling a pig not to eat -

he (or she) won't be able to follow your request
and he (or she) will only pretend to comply,
pretending it

by deceiving you and others, by creating a
pretended personality as himself or as herself,
that he or she even believes in,
*(3),*(10),*(16)

by preventing you from seeing or from
understanding his or her activities of Hating.
*(6)
'

Normal people should not Hate Criminal Minds,

no matter how much a Criminal Mind begs or goads (teases)
normal people into being Hateful as well - even to the
Criminal Mind -

that is, a Criminal Mind will try to get normal
people into radiating Hate as well, into being for
some time like a Criminal Mind, and even into a
state of wanting to destroy a Criminal Mind further.
*(11)

'

4. Criminal Minds must not be in a position where other people or
children are forced or asked to depend on some of the judgments
of a Criminal Mind about them or to have to somehow follow the
directions of a Criminal Mind, or the directions from Destructive
Cowards who are the underlings of a Criminal Mind. *(12)

'

5. Criminal Minds may be asked to leave a location.

That may be necessary in order to protect others, or to
maintain somewhere an atmosphere of understanding and
perception necessary for

(sometimes even the basic needs such as food and
shelter and communication and decency, of)

life to restore and grow and be healthy and joyful.
*(13),*(14),*(15)


Koos Nolst Trenite "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet

'All the kings of the earth
sought audience with Solomon
to hear the wisdom
God had put in his heart.'

2 Chronicles 9:23

_________
Footnotes (Updated on 12 Nov 2005):

[ see also:
'Checklist of Human Rights Issues with newest versions
up to 3 August 2006'
{HRI update list 20060803}
(3 August 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...8f2f24c9?fwc=1
]

(1) 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Psychosis'
{HRI 20030227-V2.2} (27 Feb 2003 - Version 2.2 on 23 Jan 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...702cebcf?fwc=1

(2) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty (Version 2.1)
{HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}' (7 March 2003 - V2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...1a67840e?fwc=1

(3) 'Criminal Minds ENJOY LYING, And THEY Know They Intentionally Lie'
{HRI 20050527-V3.5} (27 May 2005 - Version 3.5 on 10 June 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/hu...aae92dcf?fwc=1

(4) 'On Those Who Want Awareness Not Understood' {HRI 20030416-V1.0}
(16 April 2003 - Version 1.0)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...8fc938c0?fwc=1

(5) 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Vital
Truth' {HRI 20020819-V2.2.3}
(19 August 2002 - Version 2.2.3 on 12 May 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/ta...3ef36240?fwc=1

(6) 'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' {HRI 20030509-V3.1}
(9 May 2003 - Version 3.1 on 2 Dec 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...a4cbf0b3?fcw=1

(7) 'Understanding Eternal Criminally Minded Individuals'
{HRI 20031124} (24 November 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...32b5b016?fwc=1

(8) 'Two More Tools To Detect Criminal Minds' {HRI 20030716}
(16 July 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...8ab01b75?fwc=1

(9) 'Defining Love And Hate - A Law Of Life' V2.0i
(29 July 2002 - Version 2.0i on 7 January 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/Ko...cadc84b1?fwc=1

(10) 'Theory Of Repairing Criminal Minds' (13 Dec 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...a55476cd?fwc=1

(11) 'Definition Of Schizophrenic' {HR 20021125} (25 Nov 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...e2a0b84d?fwc=1

(12) 'The First International Law' (Version 2.0) {HRI 20021124-V2.0}
(24 November 2002 - Version 2.0 on 23 Sept 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...b1678b70?fwc=1

(13) 'Understanding Of Those Who Harm Life
- Criminal Minds Radiate Lies' {HRI 20030611-II}
(11 June 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...e57b8edf?fwc=1

(14) 'Defining The Major Harmful Or Bad Energies
- As They Are Created And Projected By Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20030611} (11 June 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...b3548129?fwc=1

(15) (nn) 'Not WHY Is There Suffering, But WHO Causes It - Is The
Question'
{HRI 20030610} (10 June 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...105d28ba?fwc=1

(16) 'Genuine Art - Producing It, Recognizing It' {HRI 20021220}
(20 Dec 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...c08294fb?fwc=1
'

____________
Verification:

http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2004-2006 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)

'Einstein blocked the way forward'

13 August 2006

(Version 2)

'

What would be interestingly applicable, to those with a science
education,

I quote from Mr. Aspden Research Papers, No. 5 (2005):

"TESLA VERSUS EINSTEIN © H. Aspden, 2005 Introduction

"As we celebrate Einstein in the centenary year since he introduced his
Theory of Relativity, there are those of us who see little to celebrate
because we believe that Einstein blocked the way forward in our quest
to tap energy from the aether.

'

"The aether is the energy source accounting for the creation of our
universe but Einstein's theory caused scientists to replace the aether
by abstract mathematical notions. Hence there has been no acceptance of
the aether as a possible new energy source, needed as our oil reserves
are eroded.

'

"It is timely, therefore, to review the claim made by Nikola Tesla,
that he had devised and constructed an automobile that was powered on
aether energy.

'

"Whereas the general public, including almost all of the scientific
community, accept Einstein's theory without question, essentially
because that has become the popular opinion in the light of E = Mc2
having significance connected with the atomic bomb, that formula
relating energy E and mass M by the speed of light in vacuum is easily
derived without any use of Einstein's doctrines. See my monograph
entitled 'Physics without Einstein: A Centenary Review' which is of
record on my website www.aspden.org

"However, I am not the only one who regards Einstein's theory as an
obstruction rather than an aid in our understanding of fundamental
energy science. The following quotations therefore seem appropriate as
an introduction to what follows.

'Tesla maintained his belief in the aether as the source of all
substance. This, he thought, was the fundamental, unifying theory of
physical things. He was quite unable to accept Einstein's theory of
relativity and curved space.'
'The Secret of the Creative Vacuum' by John Davidson [1]

'

'There is incontrovertible evidence, for example, from a number of
sources, that neither the gravitational 'constant' nor the speed of
light in a vacuum are constant after all. Since Einstein's theory of
relativity is founded upon these two assumptions, if either one of them
is shown to be incorrect, then Einstein's theory is seen to be more
relative than he thought!'
'The Secret of the Creative Vacuum' by John Davidson [2]

'

'It may come as a shock, but Einstein's theory of relativity is not
part of the design of nuclear weapons! ...... High school science
students are conditioned to ridicule the concept of a
nineteenth-century luminiferous aether with eye-rolling and giggling.
But, is this a contemptible idea, when compared with the "new and
improved" terminology of gravitational masses "warping" the
fabric of "space-time"?
'A Dissident View of Relativity Theory' by W.H.Cantrell [3]

'

'Einstein plagiarized the work of several notable scientists in his
1905 papers on special relativity and E = Mc2, yet the physics
community has never bothered to set the record straight in the past
century.'
'Albert Einstein: Plagiarist of the Century'
by Richard Moody, Jr. [4]

'

'Insofar as the theory is thought to explain the result of the
Michelson Morley experiment, I am inclined to agree with Soddy, that it
is a swindle; and I do not think [physicist] Rutherford would have
regarded it as a joke, had he realized how it would retard the rational
development of science'.
'Relativity - Joke or Swindle?' by L. Essen [5]

'

"Since Einstein is acclaimed for the scientific achievement of
upsetting our understanding of time itself, it is an interesting
observation, that the 20th century gave birth to one of the greatest
inventions ever made concerning clocks.

"It was that of Dr. Essen, the Director of the Time and Frequency
Division of Britain's National Physical Laboratory. He invented the
atomic clock and so ought to be an authority on the measurement of
time.

"That last quotation was by Dr. Essen. Somehow scientists say they can
verify Einstein's theory by conveying atomic clocks around the Earth in
aircraft but nowhere in their analysis of their experimental findings
do they show in truly physical terms how acceleration affects the
rhythm of electron motion in the atom.

"It is no wonder therefore, that Dr. Essen was outspoken concerning his
DISBELIEF in Einstein's doctrines."


References

[1] J.Davidson, 'The Secret of the Creative Vacuum',
C. W. Daniel Co. Ltd., pp. 171-172
(1989).
[2] J.Davidson, 'The Secret of the Creative Vacuum',
C. W. Daniel Co. Ltd., p. 177
(1989).
[3] W H Cantrell, 'A Dissident view of the Theory of Relativity',
'Infinite Energy', 10, Issue 58, pp. 6 & 8 (2005).
[4] R M Moody, Jr., 'The Secret of the Creative Vacuum',
'Infinite Energy', 10, Issue 58, p. 34 (2005).
[5] L. Essen, 'Relativity - Joke or Swindle?' (1988)
reprinted in 'Infinite Energy', 10, Issue 58, p. 23 (2005).
[6] P. Correa & A. Correa, 'The Search for Free Energy',
Simon & Schuster, pp. 218-222 (2001).

___________
Quoted from:
Aspden Research Papers, No. 5 (2005) - 'TESLA VERSUS EINSTEIN'
© H. Aspden, 2005

'

'

________________________
Koos Nolst Trenite wrote:

The 'Michelson and Morley religion' - Carl Sagan, the deceased
science "educator" and TV personality, is a Criminal Mind

12 August 2006

'

It isn't, that 'he, Carl Sagan, does not know' - IT IS, that

'he WANTS that YOU do not know.'

And he, Carl Sagan, states this very clearly in the
beginning of his autobiography, describing his youth
experiences.

'

It isn't, that 'he does not know' (as I did somewhat suggest before,
that that would be the case with him, Carl Sagan, that he simply
does not know) but

- IT IS, that 'he, Carl Sagan, WANTS that YOU do NOT know (as
I implied before, but did not completely voice).'

'

'

He knew and experienced truth very well, as a youth

- and THEN he set out, as so many before him, to take upon him
as his life's goal, to deny it,

a denial which of course includes

"teaching" others to ALSO deny what he knew very well and
had experienced to be true, which means,

to make as many people as possible desire to listen,
including you and me, of course, and then,

"teaching" that many others, and you and me, ALSO to
deny that, what he knew very well and had experienced to
exist and be true,

which is also the "reason" (the hidden motive) of all other
'gurus':

THEY TEACH to enforce what you will NOT LOOK AT,

as the intelligent, attentive and faithful
reader already knows (that I uncovered that
intention of 'gurus').

'

Such is the nature of Criminal Minds.

This he, Carl Sagan, hides by

(much like all other quacks and charlatans, like James Randi
etc. hide it too)

calling it - clamoring very loudly, that their and his own hiding
and denying the most essential facts and observations, is - "true
science,"

or the 'religion of Michelson and Morley,'

the two "scientists" Michelson and Morley that you
find in your physics school text books,

who set out to "prove" to the 'scientific community'
promoting in all school and text books, and in the
'"Scientific" American' magazine, "proving"

by the use of a set of fixed mirrors,

that "Life Energy Particles do not exist,"

much like stage magicians "prove," that "things
disappear."

'

And this - completely and INTENTIONALLY denying all
essential and known and recorded facts and observations,
they pronounced to be

"science" - the 'religion of Michelson and Morley'

which, as you know, has some very famous
followers,

who are considered by you to have a "high"
IQ - higher than you, even.

'

'

And of course you, much like I myself, have swallowed it all,

- "because it is so well and so smoothly and so convincingly
presented"

- "because he looks so friendly," "it feels as sympathetic as
Osama bin Laden himself"

(these use in their mask, and as their mask, the Energy
stolen from decent, caring people, so they LOOK caring
and friendly to you - it is their MASK, as you know
by now from the deeds and words of Osama bin Laden)

yes, you even paid for his, Carl Sagan's books and (if you are a
producer etc.) for his TV series

- suggesting your Intelligence Quotient currently to be well
BELOW two hundred.

'

'

Following are the rights you should grant to Criminal Minds, also
to those in 'science.'

'

Rights Of Criminal Minds

8 January 2004
{HRI 20040108-V1.0.1}

(Version 1.0.1
on 12 Nov 2005)

'

1. Criminal Minds have the right to be looked at. *(1),*(2),*(3),*(4)

'

2. Criminal Minds have the right to be exposed. *(5),*(6),*(7),*(8)

'

These are kind (nice, friendly, caring) things to do to
a Criminal Mind.

On the other hand, to NOT look at him or her and to NOT
expose him or her, is a very mean thing to do to a
Criminal Mind.

They ARE that mean, intentionally that mean, to
each other (and to themselves too);

they do so in order to deliberately let others be
more evil, to thereby deliberately let others
degrade themselves even further by doing more evil,
and

they do so by intending neither to expose nor to
stop the evil activities of other Criminal Minds.

This then gives them as well their desired feeling
of 'looking down' on other Criminal Minds.

'

3. Criminal Minds have the right not to be hated by normal people.

'

You can however not demand or ask of other Criminal Minds
not to hate them, because that's what Criminal Minds do,
they are always Hating:

They are Hating, and hiding that they are Hating,
and they are sometimes pretending to care in order
to camouflage and so exert the control in order to
Hate in a hidden manner. *(9)

So, telling Criminal Minds not to Hate, is as useless as
telling a pig not to eat -

he (or she) won't be able to follow your request
and he (or she) will only pretend to comply,
pretending it

by deceiving you and others, by creating a
pretended personality as himself or as herself,
that he or she even believes in,
*(3),*(10),*(16)

by preventing you from seeing or from
understanding his or her activities of Hating.
*(6)
'

Normal people should not Hate Criminal Minds,

no matter how much a Criminal Mind begs or goads (teases)
normal people into being Hateful as well - even to the
Criminal Mind -

that is, a Criminal Mind will try to get normal
people into radiating Hate as well, into being for
some time like a Criminal Mind, and even into a
state of wanting to destroy a Criminal Mind further.
*(11)

'

4. Criminal Minds must not be in a position where other people or
children are forced or asked to depend on some of the judgments
of a Criminal Mind about them or to have to somehow follow the
directions of a Criminal Mind, or the directions from Destructive
Cowards who are the underlings of a Criminal Mind. *(12)

'

5. Criminal Minds may be asked to leave a location.

That may be necessary in order to protect others, or to
maintain somewhere an atmosphere of understanding and
perception necessary for

(sometimes even the basic needs such as food and
shelter and communication and decency, of)

life to restore and grow and be healthy and joyful.
*(13),*(14),*(15)


Koos Nolst Trenite "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet

'All the kings of the earth
sought audience with Solomon
to hear the wisdom
God had put in his heart.'

2 Chronicles 9:23

_________
Footnotes (Updated on 12 Nov 2005):

[ see also:
'Checklist of Human Rights Issues with newest versions
up to 3 August 2006'
{HRI update list 20060803}
(3 August 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...8f2f24c9?fwc=1
]

(1) 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Psychosis'
{HRI 20030227-V2.2} (27 Feb 2003 - Version 2.2 on 23 Jan 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...702cebcf?fwc=1

(2) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty (Version 2.1)
{HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}' (7 March 2003 - V2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...1a67840e?fwc=1

(3) 'Criminal Minds ENJOY LYING, And THEY Know They Intentionally Lie'
{HRI 20050527-V3.5} (27 May 2005 - Version 3.5 on 10 June 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/hu...aae92dcf?fwc=1

(4) 'On Those Who Want Awareness Not Understood' {HRI 20030416-V1.0}
(16 April 2003 - Version 1.0)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...8fc938c0?fwc=1

(5) 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Vital
Truth' {HRI 20020819-V2.2.3}
(19 August 2002 - Version 2.2.3 on 12 May 2005)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/ta...3ef36240?fwc=1

(6) 'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' {HRI 20030509-V3.1}
(9 May 2003 - Version 3.1 on 2 Dec 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...a4cbf0b3?fcw=1

(7) 'Understanding Eternal Criminally Minded Individuals'
{HRI 20031124} (24 November 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...32b5b016?fwc=1

(8) 'Two More Tools To Detect Criminal Minds' {HRI 20030716}
(16 July 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...8ab01b75?fwc=1

(9) 'Defining Love And Hate - A Law Of Life' V2.0i
(29 July 2002 - Version 2.0i on 7 January 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/Ko...cadc84b1?fwc=1

(10) 'Theory Of Repairing Criminal Minds' (13 Dec 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...a55476cd?fwc=1

(11) 'Definition Of Schizophrenic' {HR 20021125} (25 Nov 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/sc...e2a0b84d?fwc=1

(12) 'The First International Law' (Version 2.0) {HRI 20021124-V2.0}
(24 November 2002 - Version 2.0 on 23 Sept 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...b1678b70?fwc=1

(13) 'Understanding Of Those Who Harm Life
- Criminal Minds Radiate Lies' {HRI 20030611-II}
(11 June 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...e57b8edf?fwc=1

(14) 'Defining The Major Harmful Or Bad Energies
- As They Are Created And Projected By Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20030611} (11 June 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...b3548129?fwc=1

(15) (nn) 'Not WHY Is There Suffering, But WHO Causes It - Is The
Question'
{HRI 20030610} (10 June 2003)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...105d28ba?fwc=1

(16) 'Genuine Art - Producing It, Recognizing It' {HRI 20021220}
(20 Dec 2002)
http://www.googlegroups.com/group/so...c08294fb?fwc=1
'

____________
Verification:

http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2004-2006 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)