Are sci.space Failings Linked to Speegle's Unnamed Heroes?

Mike Speegle wrote in message
...
In news:Charleston typed:
"Mike Speegle" wrote in message
...
In news:Charleston typed:

If you look back over the past few years here on SSS,
you can even see a similar almost cavalier swagger
develop among some posters with actual contempt in
several instances for those who raised safety concerns
on a multitude of issues.

I don't usually see much of a "cavalier attitude" towards
safety by most of the (saner) posters here.
snip
Could you perhaps provide examples of this "cavalier
swagger" demonstrated by some of the posters here?

Gee, do you really, really mean that Mike? Do you really
want me to go dig up a bunch of posts with names on them?

Again, Daniel, I take extreme exception to the phrase
"cavalier swagger" with regard to most reputable posters
in s.s.s. regarding safety issues in the shuttle program.

You are without doubt one of the most disingenuous posters on
these sci.space.newsgroups. You demand cites, but you supply
none. You libel and defame those like myself who put crew lives
and space shuttle integrity/protection first. You add little of value
to intelligent and worthwhile discussions here. You act like a ski
bum looking for a vacation retreat from which to hurl school-boy
insults. You have a shallow understanding of shuttle disasters.

CAIB is doing NASA and us a huge favor with all these outside
investigators with oodles of years of experience outside the agency.

You have no concrete foundation upon which to make such a
judgement. It is strictly your uninformed opinion, worth about as
little in this forum as Dan's opinion about my book. You are the
last who should be taking "extreme exception" to opinions about
"reputable posters," since you are yourself so disreputable.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)