A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Brad Guth wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
When you get your science from Brad "kooky" Guth, I'm not surprised you come
up with such ill educated bull****.

Now why on Earth would you say that, especially since I'm such a warm
and fuzzy nice guy.

My physics and of the best available hard-science that's easily
replicated is supposedly the very same as that of Einstein. Are you
calling Einstein of "ill educated bull****"?

It seems as though your the one that topic/author stalking, bashing and
summarily hijacking such into your personal Usenet cesspools where
other Jews collaborate with your Third Reich. Why is that?

Have you learned what color temperature is yet, Brad?
-
Brad Guth


--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development