Solving the black hole in my intellectual mysery

I have already solved dark matter energy, considered the greatest
puzzle
in science alive.

Dark energy is the inertial phenomena when a large volume of mass
as in hurricanes gathers in the environment, it gains rotational
inertia, and binding forces arise, binding the system more tightly
together, giving astrophysical observtions the observation that there
is hidden mass in the spiral galaxy. The large mass of stars cannot
uniformly orbit, and an inertial formation of swirling characteristics
form in such conditions. Deriving the inertial energies from such a
system, and one finds that it compacts, giving the illusion that
it has more mass than the mass of the particles. You do the
math.

Black holes. The place scientists expected to find one, and a
big one is in the nucleus of spiral galaxies like our own. There
is sufficient accumulation of mass in this region which should
form a black hole according to scientists. You need to realize,
that as large volumes of matter gain inertial rotation as hurricanes,
an eye tends to form in the center. What is a hurricane eye?
A tornado, a cyclone measuring between 5 and 25 miles in diameter.
Since a hurricane is so large, one does not get sucked up like in
a tornado, and the humidity there spirals up slowly and magestically
and forms the highest clouds.

This 'eye' cyclone effect exists in the center of spiral galaxies
as well.

There is another effect. The overall gravity, or inertia toward
the center of the galaxy is a lot weaker near the galaxy's nucleus,
but more to come on that another time.

The swirling generated by the galaxy's overall mass over-rides the
standard gravitational inertia of Suns and makes the system act
hurricane-like, somewhat chaotically and violently evolving
motion of Suns and clouds with tails spiraling and the inertiality
of the spiral galaxy curves in loops and extends far beyond the
visible region of the galaxy. Meaning when approaching a
galaxy by its edge, one may get dragged by a gravo-magnetic
current. This is new science.

The point which arose in this study, is that if a large volume of
mass in the environment gains rotation, then inertial energies
form an eye in the center of this formation, and the inertiality
of this mass-based system generates a centrufugal effect
in the center. This can be confirmed, astronomists can already
see into spiral galactic nuclei using Hubble. A torus formation
made of gas and dust is found, like a car tire or a donut,
the eye of the galaxy can be identified. Note, what binds a
spiral galaxy is gravity and mass, but the dark energies or
hurricane-like inertiality builds up with the rotation of the
large system with its storm currents of gravitational inertias,
giving birth to the classic elements of an eye and spiraling
tails. Since this formation is driven by mass accumulating
in the environment and gaining inertial rotation, the eye formation
can be derived in spiral galaxy formations as well.

So the study here of black holes narrows on the question:
what happens in the eye of a spiral galaxy?

It can be deducted that galactic eyes are tornados, cyclones,
building very high clouds, or if there is a high concentration
of matter inside the eye, jets arise.

Generally matter is expected to be repelled out from the
eye in two North and South directions.

Here, the formation of the spiral galaxy comes into question.
Before there was a spiral galactic rotation and an eye, the
center region of the spiral galaxy was explosive and chaotic.

I am not saying at this stage if there was or was not or is
not a black hole in the center of large spiral galaxies.
The idea is to determine the effects of the eye, and see
if there is a Solar object trapped in the galaxy nucleus
from before a spiral galaxy formed from its early chaotic
stages. And, yes. There is evidence that such solar objects
exist in the center of spiral galaxies. I am pretty certain
that spiral galactic eyes do not attribute to star formations,
and the mass from the solar object trapped in the
spiral galactic nucleus is being sucked off by the strong
cyclone's inertia in two North and South directions.

There is a lot to study on this subject. More to come.

I have already solved dark matter energy, considered the greatest
puzzle
in science alive.

Dark energy is the inertial phenomena when a large volume of mass
as in hurricanes gathers in the environment, it gains rotational
inertia, and binding forces arise, binding the system more tightly
together, giving astrophysical observtions the observation that there
is hidden mass in the spiral galaxy. The large mass of stars cannot
uniformly orbit, and an inertial formation of swirling characteristics
form in such conditions. Deriving the inertial energies from such a
system, and one finds that it compacts, giving the illusion that
it has more mass than the mass of the particles. You do the
math.

Black holes. The place scientists expected to find one, and a
big one is in the nucleus of spiral galaxies like our own. There
is sufficient accumulation of mass in this region which should
form a black hole according to scientists. You need to realize,
that as large volumes of matter gain inertial rotation as hurricanes,
an eye tends to form in the center. What is a hurricane eye?
A tornado, a cyclone measuring between 5 and 25 miles in diameter.
Since a hurricane is so large, one does not get sucked up like in
a tornado, and the humidity there spirals up slowly and magestically
and forms the highest clouds.

This 'eye' cyclone effect exists in the center of spiral galaxies
as well.

There is another effect. The overall gravity, or inertia toward
the center of the galaxy is a lot weaker near the galaxy's nucleus,
but more to come on that another time.

The swirling generated by the galaxy's overall mass over-rides the
standard gravitational inertia of Suns and makes the system act
hurricane-like, somewhat chaotically and violently evolving
motion of Suns and clouds with tails spiraling and the inertiality
of the spiral galaxy curves in loops and extends far beyond the
visible region of the galaxy. Meaning when approaching a
galaxy by its edge, one may get dragged by a gravo-magnetic
current. This is new science.

The point which arose in this study, is that if a large volume of
mass in the environment gains rotation, then inertial energies
form an eye in the center of this formation, and the inertiality
of this mass-based system generates a centrufugal effect
in the center. This can be confirmed, astronomists can already
see into spiral galactic nuclei using Hubble. A torus formation
made of gas and dust is found, like a car tire or a donut,
the eye of the galaxy can be identified. Note, what binds a
spiral galaxy is gravity and mass, but the dark energies or
hurricane-like inertiality builds up with the rotation of the
large system with its storm currents of gravitational inertias,
giving birth to the classic elements of an eye and spiraling
tails. Since this formation is driven by mass accumulating
in the environment and gaining inertial rotation, the eye formation
can be derived in spiral galaxy formations as well.

So the study here of black holes narrows on the question:
what happens in the eye of a spiral galaxy?

It can be deducted that galactic eyes are tornados, cyclones,
building very high clouds, or if there is a high concentration
of matter inside the eye, jets arise.

Generally matter is expected to be repelled out from the
eye in two North and South directions.

Here, the formation of the spiral galaxy comes into question.
Before there was a spiral galactic rotation and an eye, the
center region of the spiral galaxy was explosive and chaotic.

I am not saying at this stage if there was or was not or is
not a black hole in the center of large spiral galaxies.
The idea is to determine the effects of the eye, and see
if there is a Solar object trapped in the galaxy nucleus
from before a spiral galaxy formed from its early chaotic
stages. And, yes. There is evidence that such solar objects
exist in the center of spiral galaxies. I am pretty certain
that spiral galactic eyes do not attribute to star formations,
and the mass from the solar object trapped in the
spiral galactic nucleus is being sucked off by the strong
cyclone's inertia in two North and South directions.

There is a lot to study on this subject. More to come.

Continued: There was one surprizing find recently. In a quasar
scientists expected to find a black hole in its nucleus
(a quasar is a very bright galaxy), its been determined that
no X-Rays arrive from its nucleus as predicted by black hole
theories. The quasar produced jets, and the jets carried
a different source of X-Rays. (no reference, **** references,
I am writing from 'home', not from a laboratory)

So no X-Rays arriving from the nucleus of spiral galaxies
as predicted by black hole theories. Hmm. So something
different might be happening there.

The current model of the spiral galactic nucleus in this thesis
is that a solar object, perhaps a black hole is residing in the
center of the torus, and evidence (if you search yahoo images
on 'galaxy torus' or 'spiral galaxy nucleus') exists that solar
objects exist in the center of spiral galactic toruses, a possible
remnant of the galaxy's formation and one that is being
sucked and evaporated with high energies along the cyclone in North
and South directions, perhaps as energetically as black holes
suck. Galactic nuclei can burst out large source of energies,
and the question is the solar object in the center of the torus.

Was that cool?

ha escrito:

I have already solved dark matter energy, considered the greatest
puzzle
in science alive.

Dark energy is the inertial phenomena when a large volume of mass
as in hurricanes gathers in the environment, it gains rotational
inertia, and binding forces arise, binding the system more tightly
together, giving astrophysical observtions the observation that there
is hidden mass in the spiral galaxy. The large mass of stars cannot
uniformly orbit, and an inertial formation of swirling characteristics
form in such conditions. Deriving the inertial energies from such a
system, and one finds that it compacts, giving the illusion that
it has more mass than the mass of the particles. You do the
math.

Black holes. The place scientists expected to find one, and a
big one is in the nucleus of spiral galaxies like our own. There
is sufficient accumulation of mass in this region which should
form a black hole according to scientists. You need to realize,
that as large volumes of matter gain inertial rotation as hurricanes,
an eye tends to form in the center. What is a hurricane eye?
A tornado, a cyclone measuring between 5 and 25 miles in diameter.
Since a hurricane is so large, one does not get sucked up like in
a tornado, and the humidity there spirals up slowly and magestically
and forms the highest clouds.

This 'eye' cyclone effect exists in the center of spiral galaxies
as well.

There is another effect. The overall gravity, or inertia toward
the center of the galaxy is a lot weaker near the galaxy's nucleus,
but more to come on that another time.

The swirling generated by the galaxy's overall mass over-rides the
standard gravitational inertia of Suns and makes the system act
hurricane-like, somewhat chaotically and violently evolving
motion of Suns and clouds with tails spiraling and the inertiality
of the spiral galaxy curves in loops and extends far beyond the
visible region of the galaxy. Meaning when approaching a
galaxy by its edge, one may get dragged by a gravo-magnetic
current. This is new science.

The point which arose in this study, is that if a large volume of
mass in the environment gains rotation, then inertial energies
form an eye in the center of this formation, and the inertiality
of this mass-based system generates a centrufugal effect
in the center. This can be confirmed, astronomists can already
see into spiral galactic nuclei using Hubble. A torus formation
made of gas and dust is found, like a car tire or a donut,
the eye of the galaxy can be identified. Note, what binds a
spiral galaxy is gravity and mass, but the dark energies or
hurricane-like inertiality builds up with the rotation of the
large system with its storm currents of gravitational inertias,
giving birth to the classic elements of an eye and spiraling
tails. Since this formation is driven by mass accumulating
in the environment and gaining inertial rotation, the eye formation
can be derived in spiral galaxy formations as well.

So the study here of black holes narrows on the question:
what happens in the eye of a spiral galaxy?

It can be deducted that galactic eyes are tornados, cyclones,
building very high clouds, or if there is a high concentration
of matter inside the eye, jets arise.

Generally matter is expected to be repelled out from the
eye in two North and South directions.

Here, the formation of the spiral galaxy comes into question.
Before there was a spiral galactic rotation and an eye, the
center region of the spiral galaxy was explosive and chaotic.

I am not saying at this stage if there was or was not or is
not a black hole in the center of large spiral galaxies.
The idea is to determine the effects of the eye, and see
if there is a Solar object trapped in the galaxy nucleus
from before a spiral galaxy formed from its early chaotic
stages. And, yes. There is evidence that such solar objects
exist in the center of spiral galaxies. I am pretty certain
that spiral galactic eyes do not attribute to star formations,
and the mass from the solar object trapped in the
spiral galactic nucleus is being sucked off by the strong
cyclone's inertia in two North and South directions.

There is a lot to study on this subject. More to come.

Continued: There was one surprizing find recently. In a quasar
scientists expected to find a black hole in its nucleus
(a quasar is a very bright galaxy), its been determined that
no X-Rays arrive from its nucleus as predicted by black hole
theories. The quasar produced jets, and the jets carried
a different source of X-Rays. (no reference, **** references,
I am writing from 'home', not from a laboratory)

So no X-Rays arriving from the nucleus of spiral galaxies
as predicted by black hole theories. Hmm. So something
different might be happening there.

The current model of the spiral galactic nucleus in this thesis
is that a solar object, perhaps a black hole is residing in the
center of the torus, and evidence (if you search yahoo images
on 'galaxy torus' or 'spiral galaxy nucleus') exists that solar
objects exist in the center of spiral galactic toruses, a possible
remnant of the galaxy's formation and one that is being
sucked and evaporated with high energies along the cyclone in North
and South directions, perhaps as energetically as black holes
suck. Galactic nuclei can burst out large source of energies,
and the question is the solar object in the center of the torus.

Was that cool?

Ok, the answer to black holes, lays somewhere that if large masses
gaining rotation generate 'additional inertial energies' forming a
hurricane-like environment, black holes probably don't form anywhere
easily because the formation in the center of the spiral galaxy is like

a hurricane eye, which opposes matter. So the object in the quasar
experiment was likely a finding of a large star and not a black hole,
as the dark energy swirling effects (of rotating inertia of large
accumulation of mass in an environment) are "9" times more powerful
inertially than gravitational effects for a galaxy like our own (see
your
own reference in search engines of only 10 percent of mass seems
to be visible in our galaxy). These inertial forces perhaps may
over-power
gravity, and upon analysis one finds that that is true. Black holes
would generate an environment where the inertial forces arising
from the rotational aspects of large gathered masses over-power
inertially the object's gravitational forces somehow locally as the
system distributes somehow and a centrifuge in the center develops
forming high clouds. Something like that, but with the finding of dark
energies, I believe the question can be solved.

I have already solved dark matter energy, considered the greatest
puzzle
in science alive.

Dark energy is the inertial phenomena when a large volume of mass
as in hurricanes gathers in the environment, it gains rotational
inertia, and binding forces arise, binding the system more tightly
together, giving astrophysical observtions the observation that there
is hidden mass in the spiral galaxy. The large mass of stars cannot
uniformly orbit, and an inertial formation of swirling characteristics
form in such conditions. Deriving the inertial energies from such a
system, and one finds that it compacts, giving the illusion that
it has more mass than the mass of the particles. You do the
math.

Black holes. The place scientists expected to find one, and a
big one is in the nucleus of spiral galaxies like our own. There
is sufficient accumulation of mass in this region which should
form a black hole according to scientists. You need to realize,
that as large volumes of matter gain inertial rotation as hurricanes,
an eye tends to form in the center. What is a hurricane eye?
A tornado, a cyclone measuring between 5 and 25 miles in diameter.
Since a hurricane is so large, one does not get sucked up like in
a tornado, and the humidity there spirals up slowly and magestically
and forms the highest clouds.

This 'eye' cyclone effect exists in the center of spiral galaxies
as well.

There is another effect. The overall gravity, or inertia toward
the center of the galaxy is a lot weaker near the galaxy's nucleus,
but more to come on that another time.

The swirling generated by the galaxy's overall mass over-rides the
standard gravitational inertia of Suns and makes the system act
hurricane-like, somewhat chaotically and violently evolving
motion of Suns and clouds with tails spiraling and the inertiality
of the spiral galaxy curves in loops and extends far beyond the
visible region of the galaxy. Meaning when approaching a
galaxy by its edge, one may get dragged by a gravo-magnetic
current. This is new science.

The point which arose in this study, is that if a large volume of
mass in the environment gains rotation, then inertial energies
form an eye in the center of this formation, and the inertiality
of this mass-based system generates a centrufugal effect
in the center. This can be confirmed, astronomists can already
see into spiral galactic nuclei using Hubble. A torus formation
made of gas and dust is found, like a car tire or a donut,
the eye of the galaxy can be identified. Note, what binds a
spiral galaxy is gravity and mass, but the dark energies or
hurricane-like inertiality builds up with the rotation of the
large system with its storm currents of gravitational inertias,
giving birth to the classic elements of an eye and spiraling
tails. Since this formation is driven by mass accumulating
in the environment and gaining inertial rotation, the eye formation
can be derived in spiral galaxy formations as well.

So the study here of black holes narrows on the question:
what happens in the eye of a spiral galaxy?

It can be deducted that galactic eyes are tornados, cyclones,
building very high clouds, or if there is a high concentration
of matter inside the eye, jets arise.

Generally matter is expected to be repelled out from the
eye in two North and South directions.

Here, the formation of the spiral galaxy comes into question.
Before there was a spiral galactic rotation and an eye, the
center region of the spiral galaxy was explosive and chaotic.

I am not saying at this stage if there was or was not or is
not a black hole in the center of large spiral galaxies.
The idea is to determine the effects of the eye, and see
if there is a Solar object trapped in the galaxy nucleus
from before a spiral galaxy formed from its early chaotic
stages. And, yes. There is evidence that such solar objects
exist in the center of spiral galaxies. I am pretty certain
that spiral galactic eyes do not attribute to star formations,
and the mass from the solar object trapped in the
spiral galactic nucleus is being sucked off by the strong
cyclone's inertia in two North and South directions.

There is a lot to study on this subject. More to come.

Continued: There was one surprizing find recently. In a quasar
scientists expected to find a black hole in its nucleus
(a quasar is a very bright galaxy), its been determined that
no X-Rays arrive from its nucleus as predicted by black hole
theories. The quasar produced jets, and the jets carried
a different source of X-Rays. (no reference, **** references,
I am writing from 'home', not from a laboratory)

So no X-Rays arriving from the nucleus of spiral galaxies
as predicted by black hole theories. Hmm. So something
different might be happening there.

The current model of the spiral galactic nucleus in this thesis
is that a solar object, perhaps a black hole is residing in the
center of the torus, and evidence (if you search yahoo images
on 'galaxy torus' or 'spiral galaxy nucleus') exists that solar
objects exist in the center of spiral galactic toruses, a possible
remnant of the galaxy's formation and one that is being
sucked and evaporated with high energies along the cyclone in North
and South directions, perhaps as energetically as black holes
suck. Galactic nuclei can burst out large source of energies,
and the question is the solar object in the center of the torus.

Was that cool?

Ok, the answer to black holes, lays somewhere that if large masses
gaining rotation generate 'additional inertial energies' forming a
hurricane-like environment, black holes probably don't form anywhere
easily because the formation in the center of the spiral galaxy is like

a hurricane eye, which opposes matter. So the object in the quasar
experiment was likely a finding of a large star and not a black hole,
as the dark energy swirling effects (of rotating inertia of large
accumulation of mass in an environment) are "9" times more powerful
inertially than gravitational effects for a galaxy like our own (see
your
own reference in search engines of only 10 percent of mass seems
to be visible in our galaxy). These inertial forces perhaps may
over-power
gravity, and upon analysis one finds that that is true. Black holes
would generate an environment where the inertial forces arising
from the rotational aspects of large gathered masses over-power
inertially the object's gravitational forces somehow locally as the
system distributes somehow and a centrifuge in the center develops
forming high clouds. Something like that, but with the finding of dark
energies, I believe the question can be solved.

Your mother is a whore black hole. (No answer.)

Give me some radiation. (No answer)

A heavy place of cooling and evaporation builds around a spiral
galactic nucleus. An intricate balance of nature, not black
hole, you idiot!

No answers yet.

Homework: Focus on the inertial energies of binding arising
and rotation of large masses accumulated in an environment.
How can these effects explain black holes, why they should
or should not form.