Death happens, the universe is cooling... it's all basic physics.

Hi Roy_L_Fuchs,

I explained how it'd require infinite negative pressure ( thus infinite energy )
to create the perfect vacuum mentioned by the original poster:
RSF_Group,
Then I likened it to sucking a fetus out of a womb. And you replied:

You're a goddamned retarded twit.
What does the remark " sucking a fetus out of a womb "
have to do with physics, dip**** ? Or ANYTHING for that matter ?

Death happens, the universe is cooling... it's all basic physics.
See these ESA.INT facts at: www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG

Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Roy_L_Fuchs,

I explained how it'd require infinite negative pressure ( thus infinite energy )
to create the perfect vacuum mentioned by the original poster:
RSF_Group,
Then I likened it to sucking a fetus out of a womb. And you replied:

You're a goddamned retarded twit.
What does the remark " sucking a fetus out of a womb "
have to do with physics, dip**** ? Or ANYTHING for that matter ?

Death happens, the universe is cooling... it's all basic physics.
See these ESA.INT facts at: www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG
These folks obviously don't believe in anything but that of an ever
expanding and of a very singular universe at that. It's their
born-again Jewish and/or Catholic God's thing, you know (in other
words, if need be Christ on a stick or bust). Nothing ever runs into
anything nor ever dies out there, as it simply gets further and further
away no matters what your laws of physics have to say, and that's why
they're out and about to get others like yourself nailed to a cross
because of thinking outside of their mainstream status quo box.
-
Brad Guth

In article .com,
Brad Guth wrote:

Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Roy_L_Fuchs,

I explained how it'd require infinite negative pressure ( thus infinite
energy )
to create the perfect vacuum mentioned by the original poster:
RSF_Group,
Then I likened it to sucking a fetus out of a womb. And you replied:

You're a goddamned retarded twit.
What does the remark " sucking a fetus out of a womb "
have to do with physics, dip**** ? Or ANYTHING for that matter ?

Death happens, the universe is cooling... it's all basic physics.
See these ESA.INT facts at: www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG
These folks obviously don't believe in anything but that of an ever
expanding and of a very singular universe at that. It's their
born-again Jewish and/or Catholic God's thing, you know (in other
words, if need be Christ on a stick or bust). Nothing ever runs into
anything nor ever dies out there, as it simply gets further and further
away no matters what your laws of physics have to say, and that's why
they're out and about to get others like yourself nailed to a cross
because of thinking outside of their mainstream status quo box.
-
Brad Guth


Oh **** off kook. The last thing we need here is your mentally ill
ramblings.

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

Brad Guth said:
Nothing ever runs into anything nor ever dies out there, as it simply gets further and
further away no matters what your laws of physics have to say [snip]

Mmm, *my* laws of physics.
Oooo, I'm quaking in my boots. I and the other posters have just been
rebuked by someone who strongly believes in the possibility that the
mathematical principles and physical laws that run the observable
universe might be....errors from scientists being too lazy to make
*proper* maths? or the result of conspiracies by universities and
research groups aiming at obtaining grant money? or due to scientists
thirsting so much for fame and glory they make the scientific community
accept their bogus discoveries *and* give them a prize for it?

I wonder what makes our microwaves, radars, microchips, space
rendez-vous maneuvers, satellite orbitals, liquid gas production
apparatus, cryptographical coding of information, digital transfer of
information, and a zillion other things function if *my* mathematical
principles and physical laws are bogus?! Care to advance some ideas of
your own for such incredible success rates, since *we're* apparently
blind, scientifically-speaking?

Hi Penn, You quoted Brad Guth ( a Win_98 user ? ) saying:

Nothing ever runs into anything nor ever dies out there,
as it simply gets further and further away
no matter what your laws of physics have to say [snip]

According to our best observations
( WMAP, SNLS, Planck_Surveyor, SNAP, SDSS, LSST )
the universe has cooled from At_Least Planck_Temperature
( 10 ^ 32 degrees Kelvin ) to 2.7 Kelvin today,
....and Guth imagines that didn't kill anything ?
He must have thicker thermals than I do.
P.S. There's no limit to density/heat
just like there's no limit to vacuity/coldness.

Mike Schilling wrote:
Please keep this off-topic crap out of r.a.sf.w.

Out of SAA, too, please. Followups set.

--
Brian Tung
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html

=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?= wrote in
:

Hi Roy_L_Fuchs,

I explained how it'd require infinite negative pressure ( thus
infinite energy ) to create the perfect vacuum mentioned by the
original poster:

I doubt it. You'd need integrals to do that, and you really can't write
them coherently here. I read Usenet equations, but when I see Int_a^b[f(x)
dx], I just skip that post. It's bad enough in sci.math, but in here, it's
impossible. All you succeed in doing is generating a mess.