A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 06, 09:33 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.astro,uk.sci.astronomy,sci.physics
Brad Guth[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 679
Default Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone

As per Usenet that sucks and blows usual, I see nothing but MOS Usenet
static and lots of their racist flak and otherwise bigoted flatulence
to boot.

Gee whiz, I can't but wonder what their insurmountable problem is this
time around.

It must have been something that I and my lose cannon said, that was
true!

Since I normally don't intentionally post my topics into the likes of
"alt.astronomy", or much of whatever's alt.anything other because, it's
usually such an incest infested cesspool of the absolute worse possible
*******s on Earth, thus a total waste of one's time and resources.
Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and
topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living
for, just like the good old days when they got their Roman partners in
crimes against humanity to put one of their own jewboys on a stick.
-
Brad Guth

  #2  
Old July 4th 06, 02:58 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,280
Default Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone

Brad Guth wrote:

As per Usenet that sucks and blows usual, I see nothing but MOS Usenet
static and lots of their racist flak and otherwise bigoted flatulence
to boot.

Gee whiz, I can't but wonder what their insurmountable problem is this
time around.


Oh, poor baby. So oppressed you are.

It must have been something that I and my lose cannon said, that was
true!


What is a "lose cannon", Brad?

Since I normally don't intentionally post my topics into the likes of
"alt.astronomy", or much of whatever's alt.anything other because, it's
usually such an incest infested cesspool of the absolute worse possible
*******s on Earth, thus a total waste of one's time and resources.
Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and
topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living


*ding*

for, just like the good old days when they got their Roman partners in
crimes against humanity to put one of their own jewboys on a stick.


Hi, Brad!
-
Brad Guth


--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development
  #3  
Old July 4th 06, 04:42 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
Ed Otto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone


"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Brad Guth wrote:

Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and

topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living


*ding*


This is alt.astronomy, not alt.archetecture. Please take your discussion of
this period to that group.


-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
  #4  
Old July 4th 06, 05:36 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,280
Default Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone

Ed Otto wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Brad Guth wrote:

Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and
topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living


*ding*


This is alt.astronomy, not alt.archetecture. Please take your discussion of
this period to that group.


I'm sorry, my NSP does not carry alt.archetecture. Request DENIED.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development
  #5  
Old July 4th 06, 07:41 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.astro,uk.sci.astronomy,sci.physics
Brad Guth[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 679
Default Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone

Art Deco wrote:
Ed Otto wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Brad Guth wrote:

Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and
topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living

*ding*


This is alt.astronomy, not alt.archetecture. Please take your discussion of
this period to that group.


I'm sorry, my NSP does not carry alt.archetecture. Request DENIED.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development


"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

Here's one hell of a new idea, that's actually true none the less:
Our naked moon is existing much like a solid form of a Van Allen belt,
especially since the force of it's gravity is so much greater than the
wussy force of what any magnetosphere can ever hope to be, and thus lo
and behold it's actually offering itself as for a whole lot more of
what's being a source of gamma and hard-X-ray that's extra TBI hot and
DNA lethal than of the worse of any radiation zone within our Van Allen
belts has to offer, whereas a Van Allen GSO averaging 23 rads/hr while
being shielded by 2 g/cm2 (5/16" of 5086 aluminum) is nothing compared
to what our naked moon itself has to offer...

In addition to all of that bad news for human DNA and the ruse/sting of
the century, it seems that myself, Kodak and the regular laws of
physics, plus multiple other hard-science that's easily replicated can
prove those NASA/Apollo EVA unfiltered Kodak moments simply could not
have transpired upon that physically dark and nasty moon of ours.

BTW; The USSR was very much in on it, and for the very same money and
power grubbing (AKA job security) reasons, just as they were very much
in on the perpetrated cold-war that has only represented a combined
global cost impact of a few extra trillions upon trillions for each of
the past 4 decades. Now China is going to kick both of our sorry
rusemaster and infomercial butts, and simply because we've done it
entirely to ourselves.

Way to go, alt.folks.
-
Brad Guth

  #6  
Old July 5th 06, 04:45 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.astro,sci.physics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,280
Default Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone

Brad Guth wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Ed Otto wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Brad Guth wrote:

Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and
topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living

*ding*

This is alt.astronomy, not alt.archetecture. Please take your discussion of
this period to that group.


I'm sorry, my NSP does not carry alt.archetecture. Request DENIED.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development


"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

Here's one hell of a new idea, that's actually true none the less:
Our naked moon is existing much like a solid form of a Van Allen belt,


Wrong.

especially since the force of it's gravity is so much greater than the
wussy force of what any magnetosphere can ever hope to be, and thus lo


Wrong.

and behold it's actually offering itself as for a whole lot more of
what's being a source of gamma and hard-X-ray that's extra TBI hot and


Wrong.

DNA lethal than of the worse of any radiation zone within our Van Allen


Wrong.

belts has to offer, whereas a Van Allen GSO averaging 23 rads/hr while


Wrong.

being shielded by 2 g/cm2 (5/16" of 5086 aluminum) is nothing compared


Wrong.

to what our naked moon itself has to offer...


Wrong.


In addition to all of that bad news for human DNA and the ruse/sting of


Wrong.

the century, it seems that myself, Kodak and the regular laws of


Wrong.

physics, plus multiple other hard-science that's easily replicated can


Wrong.

prove those NASA/Apollo EVA unfiltered Kodak moments simply could not


Wrong.

have transpired upon that physically dark and nasty moon of ours.


Wrong.


BTW; The USSR was very much in on it, and for the very same money and


Wrong.

power grubbing (AKA job security) reasons, just as they were very much


Wrong.

in on the perpetrated cold-war that has only represented a combined


Wrong.

global cost impact of a few extra trillions upon trillions for each of


Wrong.

the past 4 decades. Now China is going to kick both of our sorry


Wrong.

rusemaster and infomercial butts, and simply because we've done it


Wrong.

entirely to ourselves.

Way to go, alt.folks.


Keep trying, Brad, random chance may allow you to post an accurate
statement at some point in the future, but I doubt it.
-
Brad Guth


--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 History 158 December 13th 14 09:50 PM
Early NASA PDFs Rusty History 48 June 13th 06 05:51 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ CAPCOM UK Astronomy 17 February 21st 06 01:07 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla UK Astronomy 11 July 25th 04 02:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.