GR-coup-mass vs SI-STANDARD-kilograms.

$$ The GR-coup changed THEiR definition-of-mass.
$$ You are confusing GR-coup-mass with SI-STANDARD-mass, dimwit.
$$ [Any QUANTiTY ..expressed in SI-STANDARD-kilograms, is mass].

$$ Golden Boar wrote: Hexenmeister wrote:
"Golden Boar" wrote in message
oups.com...
|
| Hexenmeister wrote:
| "Golden Boar" wrote in message
| oups.com...
| | The usual dimensions are mass, length, time and charge.
| |
|
| Almost right. You left out only one, which is understandable
| because it has no name. It is that property of a pole of a
| magnetic field which is analogous to charge (electric field)
| and mass (gravitational field).
| As you know, mass without another mass makes gravity
| meaningless, charge without a negative charge makes an
| electric field meaningless and of course a north without a
| south means nothing either. For some unknown reason
| researchers seem to have overlooked this.
|
| Androcles
|
| There is no proof at all that gravity acts upon mass.
| Gravity acts upon frequency.

I consider dropping a mass so that it accelerates toward the
Earth a proof. Don't call us, we'll call you if we need you.
Have a nice day.
Androcles.

Anything that has mass also has a frequency and energy,
so how can you be sure that gravity is acting upon mass,
and not upon energy or frequency. The fact that photons
are affected by gravity suggests that it is not [GR-coup]
mass which gravity act upon.

$$ The GR-coup changed THEiR definition-of-mass.
$$ You are confusing GR-coup-mass with SI-STANDARD-mass, dimwit.
$$ [Any QUANTiTY ..expressed in SI-STANDARD-kilograms, is mass].