To the moon, Alice!

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...hallenge_x.htm


some very interesting things about designing LMish prototypes.

Does this remind you of anything recent?


--
Terrell Miller


Many scientists recall President Dwight Eisenhower's warnings about the
danger of the rising postwar military-industrial complex, notes Mr. Happer,
now a Princeton physicist. In the same speech, however, Eisenhower also
warned: "We must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public
policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these
and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic
system...."
-The Week

NASA offers $2M in lunar rocket contest
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...hallenge_x.htm
"Competing teams have to build a rocket that can launch vertically,
climb to a certain altitude and suspend in the air, land at a target
100 yards away and then return to its original launch pad."

Terrell Miller,
And what exactly is this save-thy-butt contest of such a minimal
fly-by-rocket simulation that's offering an actual scaled prototype
that'll deorbit and safely accomplish a viable down-range effort
telling us?
-
Brad Guth

Is this one another insider joke, or what? : NASA offers $2M in lunar
rocket contest
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...hallenge_x.htm
"Competing teams have to build a rocket that can launch vertically,
climb to a certain altitude and suspend in the air, land at a target
100 yards away and then return to its original launch pad."

Here's to the daunting task of our having to bring on those powerful
reaction wheels. I'd have to believe that at least three such momentum
reaction units are going to be required, whereas at least two of those
units being of a fairly good amount of applied energy.

And what may I ask; exactly what other outcome is this latest
wag-thy-dog round of such a save-thy-butt contest that's offered by way
of whatever our NASA hopes to obtain is otherwise supposed to
represent, by way of this contest contributing such a minimal
fly-by-rocket simulation on the cheap, that's obviously intended to
offer the first of actual scaled fly-by-rocket prototype landers
that'll effectively demonstrate it's capable deorbit and the daunting
task of their safely accomplishing a viable down-range and return to
home effort, which is essentially telling us that our warm and fuzzy
NASA/Apollo wizards simply haven't previously had an official clue as
to their having ever gotten folks safely to/from our reactive moon?

Vision For Space Exploration Facing Critical Juncture
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Vi...unct ure.html
"It was clear to many astute observers that the ESAS program was a
political one. It was designed to mollify Congress by keeping almost
every worker in the dying Space Shuttle program in his present job,
performing the same task in the same factory in the same politician's
district."

Only the certified Third Reich clones of such an incest populated
brown-nosed army, of the minion likes of such folks having used such
pathetic infomercial-science, and otherwise of our NASA having to
depend upon those previous NASA/Apollo conditional laws of physics is
clearly of what's at stake. They obviously haven't a freaking clue as
to the mascon demanding situation and other nasty aspects of having to
get anything safely deployed upon our moon, much less safely returned
from that gamma and hard-X-ray nasty sucker.

You folks do realize that besides how mascon affected the lunar
down-range environment represents as an extremely complex fly-by-rocket
situation, of otherwise just how gosh darn and otherwise freaking gamma
and hard-X-ray hot and thus TBI humanly DNA nasty our moon actually is.

You do realize how salty and otherwise coated in deep layers of
solar/cosmic iron, titanium plus loads of radioactive elements that our
nearly coal like basalt of a physically dark albedo and nasty/reactive
our moon actually is.

Therefore, you must by now have realized that our moon isn't actually
covered with such a nifty and otherwise thin and clumping layer of
reflective portland cement and cornmeal, that isn't the least bit
reactive or otherwise electrostatic or being other than Xenon lamp
illuminated.

In other words and of a perfectly hard-science replicated matter of
fact; you do realize that Kodak's photon physics has more than proven
that all of those unfiltered EVA images simply were not those of our
moon.

You do realize that I've got a few extra dozens worth of other similar
topic line-items proving that we've not walked on our moon, thus it's
not just of one, two, or merely a dozen significant faults with those
bogus NASA/Apollo missions.

You folks do realize that your pathetic and badly skewed
infomercial-science and of all those conditional laws of physics proves
absolutely nothing on behalf of protecting your NASA/Apollo fiasco, but
that it does manage to have rather nicely proven that you're all
nothing but a bunch of LLPOF bigots, or at the very least the worse
possible snookered fools that more than ever deserve one another.
-
Brad Guth