A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

N-1 aerospike?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old April 25th 06, 04:02 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default N-1 aerospike?

Anyone happen to know why the Ruskies decided not to go with an
aerospike, by tapping off some of the oxygen from the ring of engines
and dumping it into the base region or something.

I would have expected that they would have got good performance gains
from raising the base pressure.

But I read somewhere they thought they could get ~350 seconds that way
and get 10% more payload, but they still didn't think it was worth
it??? (But others said they got no more performance at all... and that
they seemed to be under target payload... the reports seem to vary
wildly.)

Anyone got a good story about it?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rusty's Reading Room -- q snidely History 2 February 2nd 06 03:08 AM
RS-68 Aerospike Mike Dennis Space Shuttle 5 July 5th 05 03:55 AM
First propulsive aerospike flight? Allen Thomson Policy 9 April 21st 04 07:03 PM
Student/industry team launches 1st liquid fueled aerospike rocket Clark S. Lindsey Technology 3 September 25th 03 08:43 PM
Aerospike refit Chuck Stewart Space Shuttle 1 August 12th 03 11:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.