OMG!! NASA's Scott Carpenter confirms aliens!!!

Kris is just gonna LOVE this one


"LIBERATOR" wrote in message
ups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9fX9...h=NASA%20video

EVERYONE PANIC!!! lol...j/k

He says humans were seeded on Earth by aliens.

This aint no jive, and it feels right, but "WHO" and or "WHAT" are the
intelligent forms that "seeded" us, and why? Are they seeding us to eat
us? ****ers...!!! lol....

I believe it. But ok, where the **** from? And just cuz you aliens put
me in the ground like a tulip and grew me, don't mean you own me,
BIATCHES!!

LOL, all kidding aside, this is serious stuff on this video, kids.

Hold on!

This theory qualifies as 'Intelligent Design'.

The courts have ruled that any such theories are false and
cannot be taught in schools or thought in homes.

The courts have decreed that life on Earth evolved
independent of ANY external intelligent direction.

You don't wanna break the law, or be on the
same side as some Creationist whacko, do you grin??




"Terrell Miller" wrote in message
.. .
Kris is just gonna LOVE this one


"LIBERATOR" wrote in message
ups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9fX9...h=NASA%20video

EVERYONE PANIC!!! lol...j/k

He says humans were seeded on Earth by aliens.

Anyone who has seen pictures of Michael Jackson knows that aliens exist
and live among us.

Jackson is unusual in that his DNA disguise faded over time and he has
reverted to his alien physionomy. And the existence of alien "customs"
facilities below a service tower of a large New York bridge has also
been well documented and shown to millions in movie theathers, on TV and
DVD. And there was no widespread public panic when these news came out.

Also, NASA did confirm existence of life forms on the 3rd planet from
the sun. But it is unclear if it can be qualified as "intelligent".
Study of the life forms who are leaders in certain geographies were
indeterminate in terms of intelligence. But there are clear signs that
there were intelligent life forms not long ago.

So I just don't see why NASA would refuse to admit it has found
intelligent female life forms on VENUS. It is no big deal, especially
since first contact with Vulcans, to happen in 2053 in Minnesota has
already been fully documented.

Heck, we already know that it is a human who ends up travelling 10,000
years in the past and becomes a near-god to a civilisation on planet
Mimbar (a Mimbari not born of Mimbar)


What is interesting however is that the Stargate system seems to link
only planets who mave human lifeforms and whose environment resembles
the environment near Vancouver BC Canada. It is odd that Vulcans and
Klingons, Mimbars, Vorlons and Ferengi were excluded from the Stargate
network. Just think of the commercial possibilities if McDonalds were
allowed to setup franchises on a bunch of other planets. The Raith and
Romulans would no longer be a threath since they'd become fat with bad
hearts and high cholesterol.


Sorry, but the biggest puzzle left is how come when people who shift
into different dimensions and can walk across walls/people, but still
manage to stand on floors, and when their space ship accelerates, they
accelerate with that speceship. This is where all the research money
should be spent. Consider the potential for mars missions. If you could
shift the tons of water into a different dimension, you could then
accelerate that ship without the mass of all that water, yet, the water
would follow you.

"Jim Oberg" wrote in message
...
Hold on!

This theory qualifies as 'Intelligent Design'.

The courts have ruled that any such theories are false and
cannot be taught in schools or thought in homes.

The courts have decreed that life on Earth evolved
independent of ANY external intelligent direction.

You don't wanna break the law, or be on the
same side as some Creationist whacko, do you grin??

Well, in the Dover decision, the Judge ruled that when the school board
based its decision to have ID taught entirely on religious grounds (and then
lied about it in court later), insisted that teachers treat biology
differently than every other subject in school (by discussing with students
the school boards ostensible non-religious reason for teaching ID -- no
other subject was to come with a disclaimer from the school board), and then
used a known creationist textbook (Panda's and People, IIRC) in an edition
where "God" was replaced with "The Intelligent Designer" and with
essentially no other changes, what other sort of decision do you expect.