![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just watched it in NASA tv.
Wonderful. jacob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jacob navia wrote in news:4411fc0f$0$18320
: Just watched it in NASA tv. Wonderful. Looks like the Great Galactic Ghoul is still on a diet. Now for a few months of aerobraking to circularize the orbit, and MRO can start looking for Martians and lost dogs. --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damon Hill wrote in
31: jacob navia wrote in news:4411fc0f$0$18320 : Just watched it in NASA tv. Wonderful. Looks like the Great Galactic Ghoul is still on a diet. Now for a few months of aerobraking to circularize the orbit, and MRO can start looking for Martians and lost dogs. --Damon Hopefully we will see more than that (especially the MER rovers and MPL). Just got home from my shift today and even after doing this before a few times (MGS, Odyssey, and the two 98 missions), it still was great!!! I don't regularly post, but love to brag when something I worked on does its job (member of the LM prop team). The burn was perfectly nominal (best I've seen) and we are ready for some real science in about 6 months. Wasn't allowed to say on the net, but wanted to say" The MOI 6 pack (6 thrusters) sure made some gas today!". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:38:42 -0600, Damon Hill
wrote: jacob navia wrote in news:4411fc0f$0$18320 : Just watched it in NASA tv. Wonderful. Looks like the Great Galactic Ghoul is still on a diet. Now for a few months of aerobraking to circularize the orbit, and MRO can start looking for Martians and lost dogs. As the camera is the best yet to get to Mars will it be photographing the 'face'. :-) -- Christopher |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christopher wrote in
: On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:38:42 -0600, Damon Hill wrote: Now for a few months of aerobraking to circularize the orbit, and MRO can start looking for Martians and lost dogs. As the camera is the best yet to get to Mars will it be photographing the 'face'. :-) Already photographed by existing orbiters in sufficient detail to show that it's anything but a face; just another rock formation. I'd rather see high resolution imaging of existing landers, especially the Beagle and MPO, to determine what happened to them. MRO's greatest value may be as a data relay for future rovers. --Damon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:25:11 -0600, Damon Hill
wrote: I'd rather see high resolution imaging of existing landers, especially the Beagle and MPO, to determine what happened to them. MRO's greatest value may be as a data relay for future rovers. But, is the MROs' camera sensitive enough to photograph lander fragments? :-O |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Lekx wrote in
: On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:25:11 -0600, Damon Hill wrote: I'd rather see high resolution imaging of existing landers, especially the Beagle and MPO, to determine what happened to them. MRO's greatest value may be as a data relay for future rovers. But, is the MROs' camera sensitive enough to photograph lander If it can't resolve an intact lander, that might resolve the question. (Meant to say MPL, not MPO.) --Damon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Len Lekx wrote: I'd rather see high resolution imaging of existing landers, especially the Beagle and [MPL], to determine what happened to them... But, is the MROs' camera sensitive enough to photograph lander fragments? :-O If memory serves, it has several times the resolution of MOC (aboard MGS), which is what's been getting the best pictures to date. *However*, the big problem with imaging the remains of MPL or Beagle 2 is not camera resolution, but *finding* the remains, bearing in mind that in both cases, the uncertainty of location is many kilometers. It's very difficult to search such large areas with high-resolution cameras, which necessarily have pretty narrow fields of view. (In both cases, there are tentative locations based on a tiny spot or two that looks roughly like what you'd expect to see at a lander site, but those tentative locations could easily be wrong.) As I recall, there is also a problem in that MPL's landing area will be in polar winter -- i.e., dark -- by the time MRO finishes aerobraking, so there will be a year or so's delay in getting MRO images of the area. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 36,
attbi netnews wrote: ...love to brag when something I worked on does its job (member of the LM prop team). The burn was perfectly nominal (best I've seen)... What's the initial orbit like? The press releases are short of numbers, and my PDF reader has trouble with the arrival-presskit file. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 3 | June 28th 03 05:36 PM |