![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Subject: Variable Star Observing
A From: AM A Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:27:48 -0500 Your equipment and schedule are just fine for variable stars. The one point to appreciate is that you are NOT following a particular star by yourself. You are contributing your assessments into a pool of observations from hundreds of other astronomers. Thus, it really doesn't matter when you observe a given star. The main exception is a star that suddenly became active, like RS Ophiuchi right now. You should start eith a low powr eyepiece to get familiar with the field around the variable star. Make the assessment of magnitude with that power if the variable is in sight. In general, make the measurement with the lowest power that definitely shows the star. From expereince and discussion with other astronomers, the results are pretty consistently no matter what power you use, just so long as the star is actually in sight. The first place to go is the AAVSO website, www.aavso.org. There you can download and print the charts for the variable stars you want. These are absolutely nexessary for they have the magnitudes of the comparison stars marked on them. The charts come in different scales. the 'b' charts are for low power scopes or large binoculars. The 'c' charts are for the usual midsize scope at moderate power or when the star is really faint. The data to collect and send to AAVSO can be sent via email in a textfiel, provided you use the prescribed layout. This makes it easier for AAVSO to process your data and meld it into the overall database. Virtually all reports are sent electronicly rather than by snailmail. The stars to choose are based on your atronomy interst, latitude zone, hours of observing, starhopping skills. Few of the goto scopes include varaible stars in their inventory of sights, but most allow you to add your own objects. I would hazard at first a mix of long-period and semi-regular stars, a couple unpredictable stars like R Coronae and U Geminorum and SS Cygni, a few delta Cephei stars (for precise timing of minimma). The trick is NOT to make as many assessments as possible, but to make good observations consistently. And to have fun doing it., A I am considering adding some variable stars to my observing program. The A question how do I go about selecting the proper stars for my equipment and A circumstances. A A 1. Equipment, I have a 20 cm lx-90. So the selected stars shouldn't be A too bright. A A 2. On average, I get out about once a week. Here in Iowa, the weather A doesn't always cooperate. On top of that, I work a 3-3-4 12 hour work A shift. I work two 3 day weeks in a row and then a four day work week. A On the days I work, I am usually too tired to set up my equipment after A work. A A So I should be following variables that only need checked on a weekly A basis. I as of yet have not done any variable viewing, so I was thinking A of limiting it to about a dozen stars to see how I enjoy it. A A Thx, Terry --- þ RoseReader 2.52á P005004 ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - October 27, 2005 | [email protected] | News | 0 | October 27th 05 05:01 PM |
NEBRASKA STAR PARTY Report | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 5th 04 10:34 PM |
Space Calendar - March 26, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 26th 04 04:05 PM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |