![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since colonization in the future is likely to accomplished by means of
sending a microscopic "seed" of self-reproducing machinery (the "astro-chicken"), I was wondering if there has been much thought on what propulsion system would be best to send such a payload on an interstellar journey. For instance, while antimatter seems like a ridiculously expensive proposition in the human case, for an extremely small payload it seems conceivable that it could be cost effective. On the matter of laser propulsion, how tightly could we focus a laser beam at an interstellar distance? What would be the effect of having essentially no payload mass on such a system? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Welcome! - read this first | [email protected] | SETI | 2 | February 2nd 06 01:37 AM |
[sci.astro] ET Life (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (6/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:36 AM |
[sci.astro] Solar System (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (5/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:36 AM |
Big dumb rockets vs. small dumb rockets | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 28 | February 10th 05 12:55 AM |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |