Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad,

speaking on behalf of all of the deceased, and for my widow, and my
mourning cat...

please shut up.

You have yet to show anything remotely resembling evidence.

I have a bet with a few friends that says you can't respond without:

1.) dragging out your sentences.
2.) using the phrases "nay-saying," "incest cloned," "warlord,"
"oberservationolgy," "third reich," "brown-nosed," or "spookology."
3.) riding off the rails of the subject at hand, and into ad hominem
attacks (to deflect from the fact that your "argument" won't hold water.)

Personally, I think you might become a nice person, given intense
psychiatric counseling, and mood stabilizers.

Bob

Brad Guth wrote:
Here's a touch more of what I'm continually up against, whereas
sometimes it's looking a tad bit better off than other times:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...7f2b7e57a74020
Wow, will you folks take a good hard look-see at what lord William Mook
has to say;

So, yes, there can be all sorts of life in the universe, even on Venus,
even intelligent life. even technical life. I admit that possibility.
But I need to see the evidence from anyone who holds that intelligent
life is there right now. The evidence I've seen doesn't hold up.

But Sir Mook, you're certified as being intellectually as well as
biologically blind, and otherwise 100+% naysay bigoted as to damn near
everything under the sun, especially if wasn't your idea to start with
and more so naysay if it relates as to whatever rocks thy status quo
mindset of your good ship LOLLIPOP.

The last time I'd checked, naysayism wasn't yet one of the accepted
SWAG alternatives.

As to the supposed "evidence I've seen doesn't hold up" is with respect
to the evidence of your having excluded the observationology as
evidence and of otherwise having banished the regular laws of physics
away from not only Venus but that of our moon, simply because it
otherwise tends to support my contensions of their having been other
intelligent life upon Venus, that which could/should still be there.


I agree that life is likely wherever you have a self-replicating system
subject to an evolutionary process. Von Neuman worked out the
mathematical details back in the 40s.

What's more "self-replicating" than a collective of horny ETs that so
happen to be working hard at their task of pillaging and raping Venus
for all she's worth, as for their form of getting it on with one
another seems perfectly capable of "self-replicating", doesn't it?

What's not sufficiently "self-replicating" about extremophiles or those
nifty exoskeletals that I've imagined as getting their fair share of
nooky?

Why does other life need to be limited as to being "subject to an
evolutionary process"?

What's wrong with giving life a helping hand with a little influx of
intelligent design?

I'd thought that we humans have long been well into the process of our
having made all sorts of nifty new forms of life possible, as
intelligently modified in order to suit a given environment or task.


shal; Regardless of my dislike for Brad Guth, this is a bit
anthropocentric to assume that intelligent life should look the
same everywhere. Intelligence is not an elevated, super-developed
condition, but an evolutionary advantage that may happen wherever
life happens.

What's to "dislike" about Brad Guth?
I'am actually a really nice guy that hasn't the least bit of a
brown-nose, nor have I collaborated with the Third Reich, that I know
of. I'm even warm and fuzzy nicer than our resident warlord(GW Bush)
has been to folks having entirely different religious and/or political
views. That last time I'd checked, I haden't gotten arround to
inventing WMD just so that I could nuke the other guy for the taking
and/or global control of his/her oil.

I believe that I've more than honestly interpreted as to offering the
best of my subjective observationology, as to what a few of the
thousands of potential images of what the planet Venus has to offer, as
to there being extremely strong arguments on behalf of my having
identified the makings of what intelligent other life had accomplished,
that which has been right under your extremely naysay brown noses from
the very start.

BTW; I totally agree with the following. So therefore, what's William
Mook's problem?

Rational and interesting discussions of all these topics are welcome.
Unwelcome are insane and uninteresting rants lacking any scientific
evidence or even the possibility of being tested scientifically.

There's certainly nothing that's the least impossible as to having that
primary image scientifically tested to death, such as via NIMA.MIL or
by way of any number of better PhotoShop processing than what I've
accomplished. What's entirely "unwelcome" are of those insanely
brown-nosed fools on the hill insisting that their naysayism is the one
and only last word, and of such all-knowing naysayism accomplishing all
of this topic/author stalking, bashing and banishment without their
once having offered a single image interpretation that supports any
portion of their side of the argument, nor having shared upon a shred
of physics or hard-science that otherwise rules out the possibility of
other intelligent life.

Therefore "shal" is being perfectly correct that whatever's of other
intelligent life need not be as similar to us humans, nor nearly as
dumbfounded and/or as intellectually bigoted as the likes of so many
incest cloned Usenet brown-nosed species of what our humanity seems to
represent, especially of the sorts that intend to summarily suck and
blow at just about everything until them NASA/Apollo cows come home.

If Venusian locals are the cause or at fault, or otherwise if it be
visiting ETs responsible for those massive structures, makes no
difference whatsoever in my good book. If you'd like to focus upon the
Venusian local as per being naturally evolved and still less than
heathen status and thereby simply too dumbfounded to be into whatever's
radio/microwave, then I'll gladly communicate my weird and best SWAG as
thoughts upon a slew of viable notions, as to what could be the case.
Although, for reasons of safety, you may have to first remove that
intellectual naysay mindset of a white cane from between your
butt-cheeks before proceeding.
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~
Even Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree that; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very result of honest
folks having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been playing
by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident warlord(GW Bush).

Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm