![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The inflated habitats Bigelow are developing are coming in at around
twenty ton and necessarily require large expendable launchers. Bigelow has put up a $50 million prize for a five person reusable space transport. This is necessary for carrying people and equipment to and from the inflated habitats they are developing. Hence the Bigelow system is currently necessitating two separate launch vehicles. Presumably such a small high flight rate reusable space transport, as dictated by the prize, will quickly lead to per kilogram launch costs much lower than large twenty ton expendable launch vehicles. One would also presume that there would be a long period of time between the development of small low cost space transports and the development of twenty ton low cost space transports. A period of time for which Bigelow would have to seriously over pay for the larger launch services. There is no significant technical reason why Bigelow can not design their inflated habitats with the capacity to go up on the smaller reusable space transports, and more, economics will force them to make this switch anyway once the small low cost space transports they require for habitat servicing are developed. So why design the inflatable habitats so that they can only be launched in twenty ton lots to begin with? If they switch now to designing their inflatable habitats for launch on smaller space transports then they will not only save greatly on ultimate launch costs, but they will avoid a lot of dead end development work. Perhaps the greatest benefit though is that they will create a substantial up front market for small low cost space transports. This would have a far greater beneficial effect on the market than the fifty million dollar prize and it costs them nothing as it is something they will have to do anyway. Such a design change alone should quickly lead to the development of the small reusable space transports that they require for servicing the habitat modules. In making substantial future plans on launching payloads to LEO, one should be assuming a payload size that will fit with what the first generations of low cost space transports will be able to carry. Bigelow is not doing this. Pete. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - November 23, 2005 | [email protected] | History | 2 | November 25th 05 02:36 AM |
Space Calendar - October 27, 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 27th 05 05:02 PM |
Space Calendar - May 26, 2005 | [email protected] | History | 0 | May 26th 05 04:47 PM |
Space Calendar - January 28, 2005 | [email protected] | History | 1 | January 31st 05 09:33 AM |
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 | OzPirate | Policy | 0 | August 27th 04 10:11 PM |