![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In today's post, Andrew Yee announces a recent survey of galaxies
in the early universe, showing that mergers were the main action of the day, as opposed to the current universe. He then notes the surprising cessation of this heavy merger period as follows: The results further show that massive galaxies did not form rapidly, within a few million years after the Big Bang, or form gradually over an extended period of time. In a surprising finding, almost all of this merger activity occurs over a very short period of time, from the birth of the universe to about six billion years ago. Dr Conselice added: "Perhaps the most amazing thing about these results is that massive galaxy formation is largely over when the universe is half its current age. This means that all this merging activity was somehow curtailed by an unknown process." ..." I notice that this 'curtailment' of heavy mergers coincides roughly with most peoples' current estimate of the ONSET of the acceleration of the expansion of the universe. Can there be a causal connection here or is it mere coincidence? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ha scritto nel messaggio
oups.com... In today's post, Andrew Yee announces a recent survey of galaxies in the early universe, showing that mergers were the main action of the day, as opposed to the current universe. He then notes the surprising cessation of this heavy merger period as follows: The results further show that massive galaxies did not form rapidly, within a few million years after the Big Bang, or form gradually over an extended period of time. In a surprising finding, almost all of this merger activity occurs over a very short period of time, from the birth of the universe to about six billion years ago. Dr Conselice added: "Perhaps the most amazing thing about these results is that massive galaxy formation is largely over when the universe is half its current age. This means that all this merging activity was somehow curtailed by an unknown process." ..." I notice that this 'curtailment' of heavy mergers coincides roughly with most peoples' current estimate of the ONSET of the acceleration of the expansion of the universe. Can there be a causal connection here or is it mere coincidence? There's a simple connection... The Big Programmers didn't like all the mess in the Big Simulation due to heavy galaxies mergers. So some days ago (in their time scale) the Chief Architect put the variable values: Logical Accelerated_Expansion = True Number Accelerated_Speed = Very_High Great and easy job, the Big Simulated universe become very quiet and the Sims (us) could develop their strange civilization. Of course you can have some doubt, but do you think, for example, that, these days, politics in Italy has something real? It's clearly a Simulation Joke... :-) Luigi Caselli |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Refining orbital orientation | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | December 1st 05 05:16 PM |
[sci.astro] Cosmology (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (9/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:37 AM |
What are Quasars made of? | Paul Hollister | Astronomy Misc | 17 | March 9th 05 04:42 AM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Policy | 0 | February 4th 05 11:06 PM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |