![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oldwetdog wrote:
Is it proof that "Science" is morally bankrupt? Science is based on observation of facts and repeatable events. Science is objective. Morality is wholly subjective, changing from one person to the next and capable of changing from one moment to the next for any one given individual, depending on how desperate they are to get laid, for example. If science is "morally bankrupt", it's because science has the wits about it to leave unthinking, emotional outbursts to ****wits like yourself. -- "This is a phrase, NOT a sentence. It does not have a subject." - A grammar-laming, Mac-using retard named Margolotta, completely missing the point that the alleged phrase is self-referential thus the subject of the sentence is the very sentence itself. "This is the sort of English up with which I cannot put.” Winston Churchill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths? | Imperishable Stars | Misc | 46 | October 8th 04 04:08 PM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Misc | 10 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Misc | 20 | November 11th 03 07:33 PM |