|
|
#1
February 11th 06, 08:02 PM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
Another moon halo
A little better defined than last nights effort...
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/weather/moonhalo.html -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk 
|
|
#2
February 11th 06, 09:37 PM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another moon halo
Pete Lawrence wrote:
A little better defined than last nights effort... http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/weather/moonhalo.html Nice shot Pete. Here is my halo from tonight, I'm afraid it's not as good as yours  http://images.ciel.free.fr/test/halo_11_02_06.jpg -- Norbert. (no X for the answer) ====================================== knowing the universe - stellar and galaxies evolution http://nrumiano.free.fr images of the sky http://images.ciel.free.fr ======================================
|
|
#3
February 11th 06, 09:53 PM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another moon halo
"Norbert" wrote in message ... Pete Lawrence wrote: A little better defined than last nights effort... http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/weather/moonhalo.html Nice shot Pete. Here is my halo from tonight, I'm afraid it's not as good as yours http://images.ciel.free.fr/test/halo_11_02_06.jpg Hmm. I see you've got the clear skies down south tonight, while up here, we've got the clouds. Oh well. Nice pics. ally
|
|
#4
February 11th 06, 10:18 PM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another moon halo
- And on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:02:04 +0000, it was spake thus said in message Pete Lawrence :
A little better defined than last nights effort... http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/weather/moonhalo.html Excellent Pete, thanks for sharing with us. A couple of questions about it - you can probably get from the EXIF data if you used a normal digital camera ? What was the shutter speed, aperture, focal length ? TIA -- Nick in Northallerton Also @ www.whelan.me.uk And nickw7coc on Yahoo & MSN but I use http://www.trillian.cc as I like it better also on Skype and Google talk
|
|
#5
February 11th 06, 10:40 PM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another moon halo
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:18:16 +0000, Nick
wrote: - And on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:02:04 +0000, it was spake thus said in message Pete Lawrence : A little better defined than last nights effort... http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/weather/moonhalo.html Excellent Pete, thanks for sharing with us. A couple of questions about it - you can probably get from the EXIF data if you used a normal digital camera ? What was the shutter speed, aperture, focal length ? EXIF is no good for this shot Nick as the lens used is manual only. Details are f/8 16mm Zenitar lens, Canon 10D, 22s @ ISO400. Camera was tripod mounted. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Last updated 4th February 2006
|
|
#6
February 12th 06, 10:20 AM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another moon halo
Page has now been updated (if you only see one picture, refresh your
browser) with another shot. This time the Moon was higher and I decided to have a play by stacking the images. http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/weather/moonhalo.html -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk
|
|
#7
February 12th 06, 11:15 AM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another moon halo
A little better defined than last nights effort...
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/weather/moonhalo.html Excellent Pete, thanks for sharing with us. A couple of questions about it - you can probably get from the EXIF data if you used a normal digital camera ? What was the shutter speed, aperture, focal length ? EXIF is no good for this shot Nick as the lens used is manual only. Details are f/8 16mm Zenitar lens, Canon 10D, 22s @ ISO400. Camera was tripod mounted. Ah, many thanks for that Pete, decidedly better equipment than I've got no wonder it was such a good photo  Nick -- Nick in Northallerton Also @ www.whelan.me.uk And nickw7coc on Yahoo & MSN but I use http://www.trillian.cc as I like it better also on Skype and Google talk
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Misc | 10 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
| The apollo faq | the inquirer | Astronomy Misc | 11 | April 22nd 04 06:23 AM |
| significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |
Linear Mode
