![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sick and tired and I'm not going to take it anymore. Backlash.
Stars jumping around while I focus -- especially in the tiny field of my ST-4. Thus, I'm looking for recommendations for a Crayford focuser for my 8" Meade tube. It could be motorized --or not. How does one use such a focuser; i.e., do they have sufficient travel to act alone once the primary mirror has been locked in a certian position, or does one have to use the coarse focuser to get in the ballpark and then lock the mirror and go to the Crayford (as one does with Meade's electric focuser?) Feathertouch? JMI? ??? TIA Davoud -- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Davoud" wrote in message ... I'm sick and tired and I'm not going to take it anymore. Backlash. Stars jumping around while I focus -- especially in the tiny field of my ST-4. Thus, I'm looking for recommendations for a Crayford focuser for my 8" Meade tube. It could be motorized --or not. How does one use such a focuser; i.e., do they have sufficient travel to act alone once the primary mirror has been locked in a certian position, or does one have to use the coarse focuser to get in the ballpark and then lock the mirror and go to the Crayford (as one does with Meade's electric focuser?) Feathertouch? JMI? ??? TIA RACK AND PINION IS THE WAY FOR THE LONG TERM. CRAYFORDS WEAR OUT. -END- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Davoud wrote: I'm sick and tired and I'm not going to take it anymore. Backlash. Stars jumping around while I focus -- especially in the tiny field of my ST-4. Thus, I'm looking for recommendations for a Crayford focuser for my 8" Meade tube. It could be motorized --or not. How does one use such a focuser; i.e., do they have sufficient travel to act alone once the primary mirror has been locked in a certian position, or does one have to use the coarse focuser to get in the ballpark and then lock the mirror and go to the Crayford (as one does with Meade's electric focuser?) Hi: Yes. Unless your eyepieces are nearly parfocal or you leave the camera in place all the time, you're still going to be using the main focuser. The Crayford will not provide enough range for large focus changes. Also, beware of focus problems. If you have things like reducers and 2 inch diagonals in your optical train, moving everything back another inch or two with the focuser may mean you can no longer reach focus. Both the units you mention are very nice. I've used the William Optics Crayford and like it. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Join the SCT User Mailing List. http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/sct-user ============================ See my home page at http://skywatch.brainiac.com/astroland/index.htm for further details! ============================ For Uncle Rod's Astro Blog See: http://journals.aol.com/rmollise/UncleRodsAstroBlog/ Yes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() EP Guy wrote: RACK AND PINION IS THE WAY FOR THE LONG TERM. CRAYFORDS WEAR OUT. -END- Hi: Who sells a rack and pinion focuser designed to screw onto an SCT rear port? And I have never, ever had a problem with a Crayford wearing out. At least, anyway, the one on the 12.5", a JMI, is about 8 years old and has not worn out yet despite a good bit of use. ;-) Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Join the SCT User Mailing List. http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/sct-user ============================ See my home page at http://skywatch.brainiac.com/astroland/index.htm for further details! ============================ For Uncle Rod's Astro Blog See: http://journals.aol.com/rmollise/UncleRodsAstroBlog/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sick and tired and I'm not going to take it anymore. Backlash.
Stars jumping around while I focus -- especially in the tiny field of my ST-4. You might want to look at the Borg non-rotatiing helical 1.25" focuser (#7315) with the 1.25" drawtube adapter (#7316). I think this combo goes for less than $100. This unit is very nice for fine focusing (.5" travel), and might allow you to live with the built-in focuser for coarse focusing only. Dennis |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi all Here is a shot from last night of the Moon Rupes Recta in particular. http://home.comcast.net/~sctuser/wsb...D-2646553.html It was the only one of three avi's I could get to work. The wind got so bad, the other two, were just non stop vibratory images. As it was it was 32F.... All current lunar pic's are correct image oriented I am gettin better ![]() -- AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net CentOS 4.2 KDE 3.3 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davoud wrote:
I'm sick and tired and I'm not going to take it anymore. Backlash. Stars jumping around while I focus -- especially in the tiny field of my ST-4. I was wondering when you would run across this ![]() Thus, I'm looking for recommendations for a Crayford focuser for my 8" Meade tube. It could be motorized --or not. JMI - I have them on all my Newts. They work well. Go for the dual speed version. Or if money isn't much of a problem go with the Van Slyke. You'll get so tired of focusing manually that Robo-focus and Focus Max is inevitable. Don't fight it. ![]() How does one use such a focuser; Place the add on focuser at mid travel and focus the SCT using its focuser. i.e., do they have sufficient travel to act alone once the primary mirror has been locked in a certian position, or does one have to use the coarse focuser to get in the ballpark and then lock the mirror and go to the Crayford (as one does with Meade's electric focuser?) I have no experience with a C-8. But with a C-11 There is too much temperature shift between Summer and winter to handle a single primary focus position. So I use two different positions of the primary based upon the time of year (temperature). I'll confess to being confused because I was under the impression that you had a flip mate for the ST-4 ? If that's the case it's a trvial matter to recenter the guidestar isn't it ? Oh yes one other point..... always focus uphill. AKA mirror moving up. focus shift is minimal when done that way. Bill -- William R. Mattil : http://www.celestial-images.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davoud wrote:
Thus, I'm looking for recommendations for a Crayford focuser for my 8" Meade tube. It could be motorized --or not. Though I have Crayfords (JMI and Meade on mine), I would never do it again. The absolute best focuser is the Clement; see: http://www.clementfocuser.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2" r&p and Caryford focusers | David Randell | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | April 17th 05 02:21 AM |
2" r&p and Caryford focusers | David Randell | UK Astronomy | 3 | April 17th 05 02:21 AM |
Question on Reverse Crayford Focusers | bob | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | June 26th 04 04:50 PM |
Affordable Crayford focusers??? | bob | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 21st 04 06:43 PM |
Crayford focuser vs. rack and pinion | Clayton E. Cramer | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | December 22nd 03 10:35 PM |