![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Today in Physorg.web
http://www.physorg.com/news10433.html it was reported that laser driven accleration of carbon achieved 3.6 MeV/nucleon in an amazing 10 micron distance and that they could achieve fairly high beam currents. They accelerated C atoms to 36 MeV. This could be used to acclerate fuel beams to long distance space craft so that the spacecraft did not have to carry its fuel. The energy to accelerate the fuel could be produced in a close solar orbit beaming the fuel beam to the craft that would catch it and then use it as reaction mass. This would mean the spacecraft would not have to carry its fuel so the engines would need less thrust. Of course, the fuel beam velocity would have to be matched reasonably well to the speed of the spacecraft at any time but that should not be very difficult. With this system, an ion driven craft could have fairly small engines and still achieve a significant fraction of the speed of light. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sounds interesting, but not too feasible. at longer distances the aiming
system for such a thing will go into fits, and efficiency goes down the tubes. I'm not saying you shouldn't try to build a prototype of it, which would be more progress than posting someone else's article about it wrote in message ups.com... Today in Physorg.web http://www.physorg.com/news10433.html it was reported that laser driven accleration of carbon achieved 3.6 MeV/nucleon in an amazing 10 micron distance and that they could achieve fairly high beam currents. They accelerated C atoms to 36 MeV. This could be used to acclerate fuel beams to long distance space craft so that the spacecraft did not have to carry its fuel. The energy to accelerate the fuel could be produced in a close solar orbit beaming the fuel beam to the craft that would catch it and then use it as reaction mass. This would mean the spacecraft would not have to carry its fuel so the engines would need less thrust. Of course, the fuel beam velocity would have to be matched reasonably well to the speed of the spacecraft at any time but that should not be very difficult. With this system, an ion driven craft could have fairly small engines and still achieve a significant fraction of the speed of light. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry about that post, I wasnt thinking. If you could make such a
beam, it would be better simply to use the beam directly to accelerate the spacecraft. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on shuttle fuel usage on liftoff. | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 22nd 05 10:00 PM |
Question on shuttle fuel usage on liftoff. | [email protected] | Policy | 3 | June 22nd 05 10:00 PM |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |
Rockets not carrying fuel. | Robert Clark | Technology | 3 | August 7th 03 01:22 PM |
Best laser collimator | Jim Cate | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 11th 03 08:32 PM |