A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

KAL007 Coldwar Mystery



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old January 27th 06, 10:53 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.astro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default KAL007 Coldwar Mystery

In article , Jim Logajan says...

(Henry Spencer) wrote:
In a combat zone, by international law, the onus is on civilians to
identify themselves to military forces.


The civilian flight crew in this case used all possible and
internationally known means of making themselves known. It was the
Vincennes, not the flight crew, who were culpable on this point:
"Throughout its final flight IR655 was in radio contact with various air
traffic control services using standard civil aviation frequencies, and
had spoken in English to Bandar Abbas Approach Control seconds before the
Vincennes launched its missiles. The Vincennes at that time had no
equipment suitable for monitoring civil aviation frequencies, other than
the International Air Distress frequency, despite being a sophisticated
anti-aircraft warship."[1]


So your assertion, even if true, does not appear relevant.


Quite relevant. The legal requirement for someone who insists on flying
a civil aircraft through an active combat zone, is to broadcast on Guard
(i.e., the international air distress frequency), saying "For some strange
reason, we want to fly our civil aircraft over your battlefield - please do
not shoot us down." That's one of the things the frequency is for.

If the crew of IR655 had met this legal requirement, their plane would
probably not have been shot down. The crew of IR655 did not meet this
legal requirement. Probably through incompetence or carelessness, not
malice. And the crew of the Vincennes was also careless at very least
and probably incompetent at the margin. But their carelessness and/or
incompetence left them on the right side of the law, whereas that of the
IR655 crew, and for that matter the Soviet air defense command in 1983,
was criminal.

Assuming anybody cares about trivialities like the law, which most people
do not.


--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
* for success" *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KAL007 Coldwar Mystery Monte Davis Policy 10 February 6th 06 06:32 AM
Wanted: Amateur stargazers to help solve supernova mystery (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 December 21st 05 10:29 PM
WORLD MYSTERY FORUM Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 0 October 14th 04 01:46 AM
East meets West to solve space storm mystery (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 3 July 26th 04 10:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.