![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brad,
1.) why do you appear to be so very angry, when others disagree with you? 2.) why do you believe that those who disagree with you are all government agents? 3.) how does insulting other people make up for your disappointing childhood, where you had no friends? do you believe that insulting other people will help you find/get more friends? thank you, and that'll be another $75. Bob Brad Guth wrote: In order to save yourself and whomever else is within your brown-nosed borg collective from having to read any further, this following contribution is essentially my revised Klingon encrypted code for: William Mook, the disinformation spook that out-sucks GW Bush (aka our resident provocateur of crimes against humanity). William Mook; It is you that are the insane agent provocateur that gives the entire topic of space travel a bad name. We would all be better off if you would do us the service of dying and never visiting these newsgroups again. I am certain there are many here who would be more than happy to help you in that regard. All you have to do is ask. William Mook; I think anything you have to say, anything that you support, and anything that you think about is seriously flawed at many levels. First of all, other than LEO and possibly (though unproven) a few LL-1 rendezvous stints, there is no apparent "space travel" capability of any personal spacecraft that's sufficiently fly-by-rocket/lander capable, by which to give any such a "topic of space travel a bad name" to start with. Even robotuically we still have nothing that's sufficiently AI/robotic that'll manage getting itself via fly-by-rocket safely onto our extremely dusty and reactive moon, that is without creating a rather nasty down-range trough, a deep and dusty pit or that of a nifty crater in the process. When you're stipulating that "We would all be better off if you would do us the service of dying and never visiting these newsgroups again" is perhaps very true that such rusemasters as yourself do not seem to appreciate my form of sick humor that's based upon the regular laws of physics, the regular hard-science of others, or even of what's NASA if it should involve too much truth and nothing but the truth that isn't helping the NASA/Apollo ruse of the century. Thus I can understand your not wanting such interruptions that'll negatively affect your brown-nosed game plans, that includes the entire butt sucking borg collective of whomever "we" of your's stands for. As to my qualifications that has become worthy of taking on the sorts of almighty flak from your high standards and accountability of "anything that you think about is seriously flawed at many levels" is perhaps quite true that I'm a "seriously flawed" sort of lose cannon, especially about my overthinking on behalf of Earth-sciences, therefore I'm every bit as flawed as to my giving a tinkers damn about what the lower 99.9% of humanity deserves, when obviously I should have been assimulated into being exactly like yourself, as for being Jewish and intent upon knowing thy enemy so that together as a white Jewish boys club collective of a brown-nosed spooks we can summarily snooker thy scum of the earth in order to benefit the upper most 0.1% of humanity, and of our achieving that goal without even a Third Reich collaborating stitch of remorse to boot. It's quite obvious that Usenet hasn't been the one and only disinformation format of an anti-think-tank (aka naysay via William Mook) cesspool of such pagan mainstream taboo/nondisclosures on Earth, as there's always the incest cloned motherload of their status quo or bust worth of infomercial hype, of news media damage-control given all the necessary spin and wag-thy-dogs to death, and just plain old cover thy royal perpetrated cold-war butts of whatever NASA's uplink.space.com that keeps polishing on behalf of promoting upon it's butt sucking and brown-nose polishing self. Meaning that one lie is every bit as good as a million lies. By way of the loards of GOOGLE/Usenet excluding whatever evidence rocks thy boat, and by otherwise promoting upon watever best promotes thy job security plus retirement with the fullest of benefits is what the very soul of Usenet and Uplink are actually all about. Usenet and Uplink brown-nosing and thereby the most serious of buttology sucking is clearly what matters the most to the likes of Mook, whereas the truth can just wait another decade, a century or forever if need be because, it's all orchestrated and otherwise scripted to suit their pagan God(s), thereby no matters how much the trillions upon trillion of cost, no matters the environmental polluting and subsequent global warming, and obviously of the collateral damage and carnage of the innocent along the way towards global energy domination, their perpetrated ruse/sting of the century, it must continue until their grotesquely fat lady sings. On the other hand and other face of William Mook: My theory is that there is a cabal of disinformation specialists that are organized by the CIA to make sure the sci.space. newsgroups don't become a vehicle whereby useful and credible knowledge of any sort about missile technology escapes the confines of the missile proliferation policies of the US. http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/missile/ After all, how do you explain such a uniformly hostile response to a simple serious question? Except to point out that there are those out there that do not want *any* serious conversation on *any* topic in these newsgroups. Science and even the physics behind it all is strictly moderated if not orchestrated by whatever the mainstream plan of action has intended to accomplish. Clearly our perpetrated cold-war plan of action was horrifically spendy and even somewhat lethal for too many of us(aka humanity), and otherwise extremely profitable for those of the upper most 0.1% intent upon playing their incest cloned coldwar games. I guess there's nothing I hate more than another Jewish SS collaborating member of the Third Reich, especially of a spook that says one thing and then does the opposite. There's usually two sides to a coin. In Mook's case there's always a third side that's dark and without remorse, and if need be there'll even be a fourth side conjured up like so many WMD, in order to suit the bloodiest of profitable situations at hand. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Eric Chomko | Policy | 0 | January 23rd 06 05:35 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Dave Grayvis | History | 2 | January 14th 06 05:16 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Dave Grayvis | History | 3 | January 13th 06 08:40 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Dave Grayvis | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | January 13th 06 08:40 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Tom Randy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 7th 06 10:37 AM |