A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Brad Guth's Credentials



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 06, 02:17 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad,

1.) why do you appear to be so very angry, when others disagree with you?
2.) why do you believe that those who disagree with you are all
government agents?

3.) how does insulting other people make up for your disappointing
childhood, where you had no friends? do you believe that insulting other
people will help you find/get more friends?

thank you, and that'll be another $75.

Bob

Brad Guth wrote:
In order to save yourself and whomever else is within your brown-nosed
borg collective from having to read any further, this following
contribution is essentially my revised Klingon encrypted code for:
William Mook, the disinformation spook that out-sucks GW Bush (aka our
resident provocateur of crimes against humanity).


William Mook; It is you that are the insane agent provocateur that
gives the entire topic of space travel a bad name. We would all be
better off if you would do us the service of dying and never visiting
these newsgroups again. I am certain there are many here who would be
more than happy to help you in that regard. All you have to do is ask.



William Mook; I think anything you have to say, anything that you support,
and anything that you think about is seriously flawed at many levels.



First of all, other than LEO and possibly (though unproven) a few LL-1
rendezvous stints, there is no apparent "space travel" capability of
any personal spacecraft that's sufficiently fly-by-rocket/lander
capable, by which to give any such a "topic of space travel a bad name"
to start with. Even robotuically we still have nothing that's
sufficiently AI/robotic that'll manage getting itself via fly-by-rocket
safely onto our extremely dusty and reactive moon, that is without
creating a rather nasty down-range trough, a deep and dusty pit or that
of a nifty crater in the process.

When you're stipulating that "We would all be better off if you would
do us the service of dying and never visiting these newsgroups again"
is perhaps very true that such rusemasters as yourself do not seem to
appreciate my form of sick humor that's based upon the regular laws of
physics, the regular hard-science of others, or even of what's NASA if
it should involve too much truth and nothing but the truth that isn't
helping the NASA/Apollo ruse of the century. Thus I can understand
your not wanting such interruptions that'll negatively affect your
brown-nosed game plans, that includes the entire butt sucking borg
collective of whomever "we" of your's stands for.

As to my qualifications that has become worthy of taking on the sorts
of almighty flak from your high standards and accountability of
"anything that you think about is seriously flawed at many levels" is
perhaps quite true that I'm a "seriously flawed" sort of lose cannon,
especially about my overthinking on behalf of Earth-sciences, therefore
I'm every bit as flawed as to my giving a tinkers damn about what the
lower 99.9% of humanity deserves, when obviously I should have been
assimulated into being exactly like yourself, as for being Jewish and
intent upon knowing thy enemy so that together as a white Jewish boys
club collective of a brown-nosed spooks we can summarily snooker thy
scum of the earth in order to benefit the upper most 0.1% of humanity,
and of our achieving that goal without even a Third Reich collaborating
stitch of remorse to boot.

It's quite obvious that Usenet hasn't been the one and only
disinformation format of an anti-think-tank (aka naysay via William
Mook) cesspool of such pagan mainstream taboo/nondisclosures on Earth,
as there's always the incest cloned motherload of their status quo or
bust worth of infomercial hype, of news media damage-control given all
the necessary spin and wag-thy-dogs to death, and just plain old cover
thy royal perpetrated cold-war butts of whatever NASA's
uplink.space.com that keeps polishing on behalf of promoting upon it's
butt sucking and brown-nose polishing self. Meaning that one lie is
every bit as good as a million lies.

By way of the loards of GOOGLE/Usenet excluding whatever evidence rocks
thy boat, and by otherwise promoting upon watever best promotes thy job
security plus retirement with the fullest of benefits is what the very
soul of Usenet and Uplink are actually all about.

Usenet and Uplink brown-nosing and thereby the most serious of
buttology sucking is clearly what matters the most to the likes of
Mook, whereas the truth can just wait another decade, a century or
forever if need be because, it's all orchestrated and otherwise
scripted to suit their pagan God(s), thereby no matters how much the
trillions upon trillion of cost, no matters the environmental polluting
and subsequent global warming, and obviously of the collateral damage
and carnage of the innocent along the way towards global energy
domination, their perpetrated ruse/sting of the century, it must
continue until their grotesquely fat lady sings.

On the other hand and other face of William Mook:

My theory is that there is a cabal of disinformation specialists that
are organized by the CIA to make sure the sci.space. newsgroups don't
become a vehicle whereby useful and credible knowledge of any sort
about missile technology escapes the confines of the missile
proliferation policies of the US.


http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/missile/

After all, how do you explain such a uniformly hostile response to a
simple serious question? Except to point out that there are those out
there that do not want *any* serious conversation on *any* topic in
these newsgroups.



Science and even the physics behind it all is strictly moderated if not
orchestrated by whatever the mainstream plan of action has intended to
accomplish. Clearly our perpetrated cold-war plan of action was
horrifically spendy and even somewhat lethal for too many of us(aka
humanity), and otherwise extremely profitable for those of the upper
most 0.1% intent upon playing their incest cloned coldwar games. I
guess there's nothing I hate more than another Jewish SS collaborating
member of the Third Reich, especially of a spook that says one thing
and then does the opposite.

There's usually two sides to a coin. In Mook's case there's always a
third side that's dark and without remorse, and if need be there'll
even be a fourth side conjured up like so many WMD, in order to suit
the bloodiest of profitable situations at hand.
-
Brad Guth

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brad Guth's Credentials Eric Chomko Policy 0 January 23rd 06 05:35 PM
Brad Guth's Credentials Dave Grayvis History 2 January 14th 06 05:16 PM
Brad Guth's Credentials Dave Grayvis History 3 January 13th 06 08:40 PM
Brad Guth's Credentials Dave Grayvis Amateur Astronomy 4 January 13th 06 08:40 PM
Brad Guth's Credentials Tom Randy Amateur Astronomy 0 January 7th 06 10:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.