![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, much of the press coverage of the New Horizons probe is breathless
about how the probe will "pass the Moon in 9 hours." Does the probe actually go anywhere near the Moon, or should the press really be saying that the probe will pass beyond the Moon's orbital distance in 9 hours? rick jones -- Process shall set you free from the need for rational thought. these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... ![]() feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick Jones wrote in
: So, much of the press coverage of the New Horizons probe is breathless about how the probe will "pass the Moon in 9 hours." Does the probe actually go anywhere near the Moon, or should the press really be saying that the probe will pass beyond the Moon's orbital distance in 9 hours? It passes lunar orbit in nine hours, but not the Moon itself. The only enroute planetary encounter will be with Jupiter, but that was intended for the helpful gravity boost. (Science will be a bonus. Had NH passed close to the Moon, I could its instruments be configured in time to do any useful observations? No loss there.) Doubtless some news articles fail to clearly make the distinction. --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick Jones wrote:
So, much of the press coverage of the New Horizons probe is breathless about how the probe will "pass the Moon in 9 hours." Does the probe actually go anywhere near the Moon, or should the press really be saying that the probe will pass beyond the Moon's orbital distance in 9 hours? The latter. The planned launch window was 29 days, so it could not have been the case that a lunar fly-by was intended as part of the mission. Here is a quote from the New Horizons press kit: New Horizons will reach lunar orbit distance (about 384,000 kilometers or 238,600 miles from Earth) approximately nine hours after launch http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/images/mainP...essKit1_06.pdf |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 6 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | UK Astronomy | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |