![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Roberts wrote: double precision wrote: Tom Roberts wrote:
big magician wrote: does anyone knows the speed of the accelerated deviated electrons in a crt? The accelerating voltage of a typical CRT is about 15 kV, so the kinetic energy of an electron when it hits the screen is about 15 keV; it therefore has v/c ~ 0.03. would you minde being more specific on how you came up with tha 0.03 I see I made a mistake. Sorry. I use units with c=1: keV for energy, keV/c^2 for mass, and keV/c for momentum (since c=1 these distinctions are notational only). KE = 15 keV m = 511 keV/c^2 E = m + KE = 526 keV P = sqrt(E^2 - m^2) = 125 keV/c beta = v/c = P/E = 0.24 No ANGULAR momentum in there, anywhere, Tom? Duh, ```Brian. So this is more relativistic than I originally said, but not enormously so. gamma-1 is a typical measure of how large relativistic effects are, and that is 0.029 or ~3%. To obtain good crisp images across the face of a CRT (especially position being linearly related to the signal voltage) I suspect they must be taken into account in the design. As others have pointed out, bigger screens use larger voltages. Increasing to 25 kV only increases v/c to 0.30 and gamma-1 to ~5%. Tom Roberts the speed of electron. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Roberts wrote: double precision wrote: Tom Roberts wrote:
big magician wrote: does anyone knows the speed of the accelerated deviated electrons in a crt? The accelerating voltage of a typical CRT is about 15 kV, so the kinetic energy of an electron when it hits the screen is about 15 keV; it therefore has v/c ~ 0.03. would you minde being more specific on how you came up with tha 0.03 I see I made a mistake. Sorry. I use units with c=1: keV for energy, keV/c^2 for mass, and keV/c for momentum (since c=1 these distinctions are notational only). KE = 15 keV m = 511 keV/c^2 E = m + KE = 526 keV $$ GR equation corrected. Your equation leaves out a LaGrangian and your 526 keV is WRONG sign. Lets try to communicate and fix the GR equation. See where it fits: GUESS iSS GR G_uv = G_absolute / G = 1 / (n - 1) = G_relative = Gr. ENTHALPY E = m*c^2 + LaGrangian L + Volt*Amp*sec energy eV = eM + L + eV = m*c^2 + pL*c - (me*v^2 / 2) = m*c^2 + m1*c^2 - (me*v^2 / 2) = m*c^2 + h*fL + pA*fA = m*c^2 + h*fL + nA*hbar*fA = m*c^2 + nL*h*c / wl + nA*hbar*fA = iNTRiNSiC energy + LaGrangian L + Volt*CHARGE energy eV = eM + L + eV = eM + eK ..note this line, very much, fits your 526 keV; = eF + L + eK = eG + eK - eV = eG + eK + (me*v^2 / 2) = eM + eK + (me*v^2 / 2) + eV. Hamiltonian analysis confused Kinetic & Potential energy ..which is why it only fits with LaGrangian analysis in particular cases. You can only understand this if REST mass*c^2 = iNTRiNSiC energy. Note c constant is NOT equal to 1 in GUESS iSS units ..but arrives at the SAME answer and also with the SAME form, as noted, above.!! ```Brian. P = sqrt(E^2 - m^2) = 125 keV/c beta = v/c = P/E = 0.24 So this is more relativistic than I originally said, but not enormously so. gamma-1 is a typical measure of how large relativistic effects are, and that is 0.029 or ~3%. To obtain good crisp images across the face of a CRT (especially position being linearly related to the signal voltage) I suspect they must be taken into account in the design. As others have pointed out, bigger screens use larger voltages. Increasing to 25 kV only increases v/c to 0.30 and gamma-1 to ~5%. Tom Roberts the speed of electron. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$$ GR equation corrected.
Tom Roberts wrote: double precision wrote: Tom Roberts wrote: big magician wrote: does anyone knows the speed of the accelerated deviated electrons in a crt? The accelerating voltage of a typical CRT is about 15 kV, so the kinetic energy of an electron when it hits the screen is about 15 keV; it therefore has v/c ~ 0.03. would you minde being more specific on how you came up with tha 0.03 I see I made a mistake. Sorry. I use units with c=1: keV for energy, keV/c^2 for mass, and keV/c for momentum (since c=1 these distinctions are notational only). KE = 15 keV m = 511 keV/c^2 E = m + KE = 526 keV $$ GR equation corrected. Your GR equation shows no LaGrangian L; And no Angular momentum pA. Lets try to communicate and fix the GR equation. See where it fits: GUESS iSS GR G_uv = G_absolute / G = 1 / (n - 1) = G_relative = Gr. ENTHALPY E = m*c^2 + LaGrangian L + Volt*Amp*sec energy eV = eM + L + eV = m*c^2 + pL*c + pA*fA ..added line; = m*c^2 + pL*c - (me*v^2 / 2) = m*c^2 + m1*c^2 - (me*v^2 / 2) = m*c^2 + h*fL + pA*fA = m*c^2 + h*fL + nA*hbar*fA = m*c^2 + nL*h*c / wl + nA*hbar*fA = iNTRiNSiC energy + LaGrangian L + Volt*CHARGE energy eV = eM + L + eV = eM + eK ..note this line, very much, fits your 526 keV; = eF + L + eK = eG + eK - eV = eG + eK + (me*v^2 / 2) = eM + eK + (me*v^2 / 2) + eV. Hamiltonian analysis confused Kinetic & Potential energy ..which is why it only fits with LaGrangian analysis in particular cases. You can only understand this if REST mass*c^2 = iNTRiNSiC energy. Note c constant is NOT equal to 1 in GUESS iSS units, but arrives at the SAME answer and also with the SAME form, as noted above.!! ```Brian. P = sqrt(E^2 - m^2) = 125 keV/c beta = v/c = P/E = 0.24 So this is more relativistic than I originally said, but not enormously so. gamma-1 is a typical measure of how large relativistic effects are, and that is 0.029 or ~3%. To obtain good crisp images across the face of a CRT (especially position being linearly related to the signal voltage) I suspect they must be taken into account in the design. As others have pointed out, bigger screens use larger voltages. Increasing to 25 kV only increases v/c to 0.30 and gamma-1 to ~5%. Tom Roberts the speed of electron. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model | newedana | Astronomy Misc | 236 | May 2nd 06 09:25 AM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Space Station | 0 | February 4th 05 11:10 PM |
Gravity as Falling Space | Henry Haapalainen | Science | 1 | September 4th 04 04:08 PM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |
the speed of a satellite while bringing it into orbit | Kent | Misc | 0 | July 24th 03 12:54 PM |