![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Firstly, I know bugger all about astronomy.. apart from space is big... etc
However, my wife who is from Montana (you would not believe the starscape there) knows quite a bit about it. She's always wanted a good telescope but has never been able to afford one worth buying. I'd like to buy her one for her birthday ithout asking her and spoiling the surprise. Being of the "you get what you pay for" frame of mind, I'd like to find a decent spec telescope that won't limit her or our son as he gets older. What should I be looking for ? Would like it to be computer controlled and have ability to do photography. Computer cotrolled - just need a low end laptop ? photography - have a canon SLR cameral, will that work ? Ye, I know it's vague, but any info would be welcome. Thanks Adrian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Nytecam 51N 0.1W Last edited by nytecam : January 9th 06 at 10:07 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Adrian Parker" wrote in message . uk... SNIP She's always wanted a good telescope but has never been able to afford one worth buying. I'd like to buy her one for her birthday ithout asking her and spoiling the surprise. Being of the "you get what you pay for" frame of mind, I'd like to find a decent spec telescope that won't limit her or our son as he gets older. What should I be looking for ? Would like it to be computer controlled and have ability to do photography. Computer cotrolled - just need a low end laptop ? photography - have a canon SLR cameral, will that work ? What would she be happiest looking at, Deep Space, Planets or both? How much are you happy to spend? When you say "computer controlled": GOTO telescopes manufactured by companies such as Meade and Celestron have dedicated computer handsets to control the telescope. They can also be linked to a laptop with the correct cable. If you're taking pictures with a webcam or dedicated imager you'll be needing a laptop anyway. What type of photography? Planets, moon and sun are best achieved with a decent webcam (or similar) and can be obtained with a lower end mount/drive due to the short exposures required. Deep Sky photography requires a better (cue: more expensive) mount and drives. Your Canon SLR camera is capable of astrophotography but you'd be better off with either a dedicated astro imager or a Digital SLR as they're both more sensitive and linear compared to film. Like buying a car, any end choice will be a mix of objective and subjective opinion. Very generally speaking: Newtonian telescopes are better for deep space work, offering larger aperture for your buck and tend to be larger and heavier. Refractors tend to be happier with the solar system and tend to be easier to carry; lighter with smaller apertures due to the cost of quality optics but offer higher levels of contrast with no central obstruction. SCT's offer a happy compromise in weight, aperture and cost. There are exceptions to this, i.e. Some fantastic deep sky photography can be obtained with small (fast) refractors but generally the above will serve you well. I use a Meade LX90 http://www.meade.com/lx90/index.html Amongst other things the Meade LX200 offers a better drive system http://www.meade.com/lx200gps/8_10_lx200gps.html The LX90 was a compromise on cost but I'm still very happy with it. Hope this helps a little. Regards Chris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you picked up any clues from her? What would she like to look at
most? If mostly moon and planets then most here would suggest a refractor. If mostly deep sky stuff, then reflectors give you more aperture per £ (and aperture is king in this regard). Whether you should choose SCT, Newt or Dob kind of depends on the budget more than anything... If you think general purpose is "safest", then you'll get as many suggestions as there are scopes on this forum :-/ Taking a total guess - how about an Orion 80ED? Nice simple refractor that's nearly as good as some APO's costing a lot more. It has a good focal length for planets (with barlow) and is good for wide(ish) field work on clusters etc. A bit limited for DSO's, but the prominent ones all show up well. You're looking at the thick end of £500 with tripod and a couple of decent eyepieces. Don't bother with goto. If the missus knows her skies, she can teach the sprog (and you :-) how to star-hop with this kind of setup. Cheers Beats |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's your budget? Astrophotography can expensive.
Where do you live? How's the light pollution? Do you have a car and the ability to drive to a dark site? Are you and/or your wife able to manage a bulky and/or heavy telescope? Thanks, Greg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the replys guys..
I'd say that although planets are good to look at, she would want to be able to see deep space objects too. So (from what I've read so far), the Meade LX90 looks like a good bet. The reason I specified GOTO is that my eyesight is quite poor, so sky hopping would be at best difficult for me even though my missus wouldn't have a problem with it. We live in Telford, Shropshire which has some pretty dark areas once you get out of town.. As long as we can hook a camera (of some kind) up to the scope, we can get that later once we get used to it. Again, thanks for the help Adrian "Adrian Parker" wrote in message . uk... Firstly, I know bugger all about astronomy.. apart from space is big... etc However, my wife who is from Montana (you would not believe the starscape there) knows quite a bit about it. She's always wanted a good telescope but has never been able to afford one worth buying. I'd like to buy her one for her birthday ithout asking her and spoiling the surprise. Being of the "you get what you pay for" frame of mind, I'd like to find a decent spec telescope that won't limit her or our son as he gets older. What should I be looking for ? Would like it to be computer controlled and have ability to do photography. Computer cotrolled - just need a low end laptop ? photography - have a canon SLR cameral, will that work ? Ye, I know it's vague, but any info would be welcome. Thanks Adrian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian,
nearly everyone here will recognise the thought processes you are going through at this stage. The goto on LX90's will still require visual acuity to "put it right" after slew (unless you manage to get setup absolutely spot on every time out - AND the mechanics are way up on the bell curve of quality for such a device). Put it this way. Once you outgrow the LX90, the only option is to sell it. Once you outgrow a tripod-mounted 80ED (or similar refractor), you have more options available to you - like buying a better mount, or using it as a guide scope on a better SCT (e.g. LX200GPS or even an LX200 classic). Just food for thought... Cheers Beats |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could anyone give a few pointers to starter scopes around the £300 and
£500 mark ? The Meade LX90 look superb, with a nice price to match ! I currently have a home made 4.5 inch dob, and my main issue is a complete lack of understanding of what is where in the sky. I'm going to hopefully rectify that with an OU course and a read of turn left at Orion. It also doesn't help that I am a complete wimp in terms of wanting to stand outside in the freezing cold, despite having wonderfully dark skies being near the coast. Maybe I should take the advice in a book I read, which says the first piece of equipment you should buy is an extra pair of socks to wear ! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:56:41 +0000, Interstellar OverDrive
wrote: Hi Syd, Could anyone give a few pointers to starter scopes around the £300 and £500 mark ? The Meade LX90 look superb, with a nice price to match ! There are so many different type of 'scopes that is really depends on what you want to observe and how good your night sky is. The Meade range are good, although not the cheapest and there are many other makes that are satisfactory. It really does depend on your requirements, which is possibly why no-one has answered you post until now. I currently have a home made 4.5 inch dob, and my main issue is a complete lack of understanding of what is where in the sky. I'm going to hopefully rectify that with an OU course and a read of turn left at Orion. Many like Turn Left at Orion, I find it a bit too basic. Go to your library and see what they have; mine has a huge range of books on astronomy and a lot aimed at beginners. It also doesn't help that I am a complete wimp in terms of wanting to stand outside in the freezing cold, despite having wonderfully dark skies being near the coast. Maybe I should take the advice in a book I read, which says the first piece of equipment you should buy is an extra pair of socks to wear ! Yes, it does get cold out there and you have to insulate yourself. I use a pair of aprez ski boots, a really thick windproof alpine type jacket and a thick hat and I almost never get cold, even in freezing conditions. Regards - Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some advice needed for newcomer | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | November 22nd 05 09:53 PM |
Mars imaging advice needed | Andy Grove | UK Astronomy | 3 | October 23rd 05 04:30 PM |
Advice on buying a scope | Paul Davenport | UK Astronomy | 3 | August 14th 05 08:51 PM |
*BAD-ASTRONOMY ADVICE from NEWSWEEK (sad!) -- S&T and ASTRONOMYBEWARE! | bwhiting | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | August 17th 03 02:03 AM |
Buying advice needed for telescope | Swaroop Kumar | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | August 8th 03 03:03 AM |