![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings
I bought a 6" f/8 Celestron refractor on Astromart---The false color is horrible. I remember reading about an inline corrector of some kind---not a simple $49 filter but a rather expensive item---anyone know about these things? OR, does anyone want a Celestron 6" for $325 plus shipping!!!!!!? Doink |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure Doink, the Chromacorr made by Valery D., of Aries, but do you want
to spend around $500-700 to fix the shortcomings of a refractor worth $325? Chromatic aberration won't be the only shortcoming with these, so don't figure on AP performance even with the Chromacorr. Mark |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doink" wrote in message ... Greetings I bought a 6" f/8 Celestron refractor on Astromart---The false color is horrible. I remember reading about an inline corrector of some kind---not a simple $49 filter but a rather expensive item---anyone know about these things? OR, does anyone want a Celestron 6" for $325 plus shipping!!!!!!? Doink I think you are thinking of the "Chromacorr." Rockett Crawford |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How well do they work?
"Mark D" wrote in message ... Sure Doink, the Chromacorr made by Valery D., of Aries, but do you want to spend around $500-700 to fix the shortcomings of a refractor worth $325? Chromatic aberration won't be the only shortcoming with these, so don't figure on AP performance even with the Chromacorr. Mark |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doink" wrote in message ... How well do they work? "Mark D" wrote in message ... Sure Doink, the Chromacorr made by Valery D., of Aries, but do you want to spend around $500-700 to fix the shortcomings of a refractor worth $325? Chromatic aberration won't be the only shortcoming with these, so don't figure on AP performance even with the Chromacorr. Mark Pal, you should first be absolutely sure that the optical performance is satisfactory. FORGET chromatic abberation. Test it damn it, ANYWAY YOU CAAAANNNNN! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doink, as far as how well they work, there's lots of past info on these.
Perhaps try a google on Chromacorr. One shortcoming I can recall with the 6" Celestron, or other Synta variant, was sloppiness with the focuser, and this creates havoc using the Chromacorr. mark |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doink" wrote in message
... Greetings I bought a 6" f/8 Celestron refractor on Astromart---The false color is horrible. I remember reading about an inline corrector of some kind---not a simple $49 filter but a rather expensive item---anyone know about these things? OR, does anyone want a Celestron 6" for $325 plus shipping!!!!!!? Doink Go to Orion Telescopes website and take a look at their V Block filter designed for reducing false color in achro's http://www.telescope.com/shopping/pr...ProductID=6386 AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doink" wrote in message ... Greetings I bought a 6" f/8 Celestron refractor on Astromart---The false color is horrible. I remember reading about an inline corrector of some kind---not a simple $49 filter but a rather expensive item---anyone know about these things? OR, does anyone want a Celestron 6" for $325 plus shipping!!!!!!? Doink Is this any help ? jc --------------------------------------------------- Baader Fringe-Killer Filter. The Baader Fringe-Killer Filter minimizes unwanted blue fringing, comparable to a Minus-Violet Filter, while retaining a very pleasing colour balance. This would be a contradiction in itself - only made possible by applying modern DWDM plasma coating technology, almost a hundred coating layes to be accumulated onto a planoptically polished substrate - without destroying the optical figure! This fine optical tool will help a small refractor to really put the advertised magnification within reach. Performance rivals that of the most expensive colour correcting lens systems, costing 20 times as much! Properties: * Offering the brightest image of all colour-correcting devices in the industry, makes the Fringe-Killer a must for even the smallest of refracting telescopes. * Removes blue fringing as well as RED fringing above 650nm. * Breaks the intensity of the devastating false blue colour in a completely new way, never before being manufactured as an astronomical filter. * Forms a "plateau" of eff. 50% transmission in the blue spectral region from 450nm to 480nm - being much more complex to produce than even the narrowest of Nebula Filters. * Retains the highest light transmission of all known correcting devices - bit it filters or lenses - in all important deep sky wavelengths from 486/501 up to 656nm. LIGHT is the hottest commodity for high magnification work. * Built-in infrared blocker, ranging from 656 to 1150nm, makes it the perfect tool for CCD work, as well as afocal projection photography with digital cameras for Moon & Planets. * Subtlest of colour variations remain visible in planetary surface detail, due to the excellent colour balance. * Fits 1.25" and 2" eyepiece filter threads. * Planoptically polished, means perfect sharpness, even when mounted way in front of a binocular viewer, or during afocal projection (digital imaging). * No deterioration of resolution with magnification at 300x or more (seeing conditions permitting) as would happen with the usual "flame polished" glass, commonly used for all sorts of filters. * Coating - Plasma assisted, hardest, scratch proof and water impermeable dieelectric coatings of almost 50 coating layers on either side, most carefully designed to extend equal tension onto either side of the substrate - in order to retain a highest quality optical figure. * Will make the performance of a simple f/8 economy refractor look like a classic f/15 Fraunhofer-Achromate. See it to believe it!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. I was wondering about experience with these filters...have you
tried the Baader? Doink "john carruthers" wrote in message ... "Doink" wrote in message ... Greetings I bought a 6" f/8 Celestron refractor on Astromart---The false color is horrible. I remember reading about an inline corrector of some kind---not a simple $49 filter but a rather expensive item---anyone know about these things? OR, does anyone want a Celestron 6" for $325 plus shipping!!!!!!? Doink Is this any help ? jc --------------------------------------------------- Baader Fringe-Killer Filter. The Baader Fringe-Killer Filter minimizes unwanted blue fringing, comparable to a Minus-Violet Filter, while retaining a very pleasing colour balance. This would be a contradiction in itself - only made possible by applying modern DWDM plasma coating technology, almost a hundred coating layes to be accumulated onto a planoptically polished substrate - without destroying the optical figure! This fine optical tool will help a small refractor to really put the advertised magnification within reach. Performance rivals that of the most expensive colour correcting lens systems, costing 20 times as much! Properties: * Offering the brightest image of all colour-correcting devices in the industry, makes the Fringe-Killer a must for even the smallest of refracting telescopes. * Removes blue fringing as well as RED fringing above 650nm. * Breaks the intensity of the devastating false blue colour in a completely new way, never before being manufactured as an astronomical filter. * Forms a "plateau" of eff. 50% transmission in the blue spectral region from 450nm to 480nm - being much more complex to produce than even the narrowest of Nebula Filters. * Retains the highest light transmission of all known correcting devices - bit it filters or lenses - in all important deep sky wavelengths from 486/501 up to 656nm. LIGHT is the hottest commodity for high magnification work. * Built-in infrared blocker, ranging from 656 to 1150nm, makes it the perfect tool for CCD work, as well as afocal projection photography with digital cameras for Moon & Planets. * Subtlest of colour variations remain visible in planetary surface detail, due to the excellent colour balance. * Fits 1.25" and 2" eyepiece filter threads. * Planoptically polished, means perfect sharpness, even when mounted way in front of a binocular viewer, or during afocal projection (digital imaging). * No deterioration of resolution with magnification at 300x or more (seeing conditions permitting) as would happen with the usual "flame polished" glass, commonly used for all sorts of filters. * Coating - Plasma assisted, hardest, scratch proof and water impermeable dieelectric coatings of almost 50 coating layers on either side, most carefully designed to extend equal tension onto either side of the substrate - in order to retain a highest quality optical figure. * Will make the performance of a simple f/8 economy refractor look like a classic f/15 Fraunhofer-Achromate. See it to believe it!! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark D wrote:
Sure Doink, the Chromacorr made by Valery D., of Aries, but do you want to spend around $500-700 to fix the shortcomings of a refractor worth $325? Chromatic aberration won't be the only shortcoming with these, so don't figure on AP performance even with the Chromacorr. Mark Valery will show up here and promise some miraculous version of Chromacorr - next year ;-) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron vs Celestron Pacific | Mean Mr Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 31 | April 23rd 05 10:09 AM |
Orange Country Register: Celestron Down, Meade Sinking | RMOLLISE | Amateur Astronomy | 38 | April 6th 05 04:24 AM |
Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Clayton E. Cramer | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | December 20th 03 07:02 AM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |