![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Astronomy is an absolute science (most of the time) but history is not.
Thus the history experts will always have the final word on dating and chronology. Having said that, sometimes history does affect some astronomical references. Case in point the eclipse mentioned by Herodotus that occurred the year that Xerxes invaded Greece. The popular date for that event is 480 BCE. The eclipse was supposed to have occurred in the spring of that year, but no eclipse seen in Persia occurred that year. So why did Herodotus mention it? The answer to that is because there was an eclipse in the original timeline Herodotus was using. We know enough about the revisions of the Persians to their history, including influencing the revision of Greek history via Xenophon to know that the distortions occurred in two phases. The first phase was to add 30 years to the rule of Darius I (who only ruled for 6 years) and to adjust this with some of the years of the Neo-Babylonian kings, but only 26 years were removed. Even so, by the time of Darius' death the timeline was synchronized again. The original timeline for the Battle of Marathon was 434BCE and for the invasion by Xerxes in 424BCE. So, of course, there was an eclipse sen in Persia in 424BCE. But when the second phase of the revisions occurred by Xenophon who redacted Thucycides, another 56 years were added to the timeline. The original plan was to add another 30 years which was placed in the 20-year interval between the two wars, making it 50 years. But because of an eclipse event occurring the first year of the Peloponnesian War needing to be reset, it was reset from 403BCE to 431BCE and this added an additional offset of 28 years, making the total offset between the two wars now 50 years. But this was problematic since Herodotus reported that the invasion occurred during an Olympic year. The original event had been pushed back from 424BCE to 482BCE. So chronologists adjusted this by 2 years to have the event occur in 480BCE. Of course, Herodotus had already written his history and so the Xerxes eclipse reference became completely spurious. So bottom line why there is no eclipse in the year of Xerxes' invasion as reported by Herodotus is simply because Herodotus was using a different timeline when he wrote his history than the one we have now. There was some distortion of the chronology during the time of Herodotus but not after the death of Darius. Of course some who are not historical experts will be at a loss regarding the redating, but simply as a reference to historical eclipses, this is why the Xerxes eclipse has no reference. Herodotus wasn't simply imaginging it or inventing it, he was dealing with a different timeline. So, for those who truly want to be informed, now you know! : Larry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GravityShieldingUpdates1.1 | Stan Byers | Research | 3 | March 23rd 05 01:28 PM |
Total Lunar Eclipse to Occur on the Night of Oct. 27th (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | October 24th 04 11:11 PM |
Jupiter Events ( December 2003 ) | Brendan DJ Murphy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 30th 03 12:39 PM |
The November 8th Total Eclipse of the Moon | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | October 28th 03 07:31 PM |
The November 8th Total Eclipse of the Moon (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 28th 03 05:41 PM |