![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had a really clear night here in western Washington two night ago and
had great (though cold at 24F) seeing for this area. I tried using the Celestron LPR filter for the first time with film photography. Just tried taking pictures of fairly dense areas of stars in the Milky Way. Didn't see really see anything through the filter, so with the idea that there would be some star light there I took a couple 30 minute exposures on 200 speed color film (all I had handy). Frames werealmost totally blank, just a star or two discernable under the loupe. Is the problem the filter, or do I need to do longer exposures? Is Celestron's filter not as good as others? When I've tried pictures without the filter I get the stars but the background come out greyish. Any suggestions would be helpful, thanks in advance. (Oh, using a Celestron C8 NGT - f5, fl=1000mm, if that makes a difference) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AScribe Newswi Quantum Dots That Produce White Light Could BeLight Bulb's Successor | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 22nd 05 03:52 AM |
GravityShieldingUpdates1.1 | Stan Byers | Research | 3 | March 23rd 05 01:28 PM |
CRACK THIS CODE!!! NASA CAN'T | zetasum | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 3rd 05 12:27 AM |
Mind-2, Time waves and Theory of Everything | Yoda | Misc | 0 | April 20th 04 06:11 AM |