![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$ Dear YAB-a-dab-a-dooOP..
"Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?" doesn't include ..within it, "The Laws of Nature" alluded-to, dimwit.?! You DiD NOT SHOW "The Laws of NATURE" ..in iNTEGRAL FORM, idiot.!! brian a m stuckless Jay R. Yablon wrote: Hello to all: As I mentioned previously, DRL earlier pointed out some problems endemic to general relativity with respect to volume integrations of energy / momentum in spacetime, and Igor had some comments regarding connections I was attempting to make between general relativity and quantum mechanics, on SPR. As a consequence of these extremely helpful comments, I have prepared a draft paper which I believe begins to address these issues. It is posted on my web site at http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm, the title is: "Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?" A direct link is below: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/Papers/...20and%20GR.pdf I would appreciate any comments you may have on this draft paper. Very truly yours, Jay R. Yablon _____________________________ Jay R. Yablon Email: . Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 206) | John Baez | Research | 27 | June 7th 04 06:37 PM |