![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eagle Eye Until my theory of the creation of the big bang is widely
excepted(In Sci.Mags,and Google) it is best said that the universe started when the first man looked up at the sky. Reality is the universe created man so it could see itself. Fact is you can't just come up with all there is inside a big bang. That in my thinking is putting the horse in front of the cart. You need a theory of "what was" before the BB,and why it had to happen eons ago. Why there are now more universes than flakes of snow in an endless storm,and why they are all exactly the same other then they have their own spacetime,a consequence that goes back to the event of their BB Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Problem of a beginning | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 1 | October 30th 05 01:06 PM |
NASA'S Spitzer Marks Beginning of New Age of Planetary Science | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | March 22nd 05 08:25 PM |
NASA'S Spitzer Marks Beginning of New Age of Planetary Science | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 22nd 05 08:25 PM |
The Big Bang is not the Beginning of TIme......The latest non-linearcosmology. | Sir Cumference | Policy | 0 | October 10th 04 05:49 AM |
New Phase of Exploration Beginning for Mars Rovers | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 27th 04 01:30 AM |