![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since I have been working on my flying car development I started to
contemplate what it would be like if I tried to go to orbit. For starters I imagine that I already have finished the flying car. This is a composit four seater vertical takeoff airplane/car that weighs about a ton fully fuelled with four passengers. It uses air breathing ramjet-like engines that allow it to hover and to takeoff and land vertically as well as fly horizontally. I have considered how hard it would be to build an SSTO and made some basic computations. I will include here a logarithm table: x , ln(x) 2 ,0.69 3 ,1.10 4 ,1.39 5 ,1.61 6 ,1.79 7 ,1.95 8 ,2.08 9 ,2.20 10 ,2.30 Next I will print a table for the necessary mass ratio values both for orbit (8400 m/s) and half orbital (4200 m/s) velocities as a function of engine Isp values. Isp half full 500 2.35 6 450 2.59 7 400 2.92 8.5 350 3.40 11.5 300 4.20 17 250 5.50 31 From the first table I conclude that it makes sense to try to achieve at least a mass ratio of about 7 in a stage, for two reasons: 1. It is feasible, not very difficult 2. Higher mass ratios increase risk of structural failure, lower mass ratios don't get the job done. So I imagine I build an LOX-LH2 upper stage with an Isp between 400 and 450 and a mass ratio between about 7 and 8. This upper stage can in itself achieve a dV of 8400 m/s. Now I have a total mass of about 16 tons with the flying car fully fuelled and the upper stage fully fuelled. Instead of using the 8400 total dV to go to orbit, I want to use half of my dV on the way to orbit, the other half to decelerate before reentering on the way home. So what I do is build a first stage that launches me to something like 100 miles up with a horizontal half orbital velocity. My first stage will weigh somewhere around 100 tons or maybe 150 depending on how low-tech I make my engines. If I am lucky and successfully use an air breathing engine that functions as a hydrocarbon rocket engine higher up, I might have a 50 ton fist stage. The first stage reenters at 4200 m/s which is much more gentle than full orbital velocity (a quarter of the energy). Subsequently it glides to a nice landing to be reused. After completing its orbital mission the second stage uses its extra dV to decelerate from orbit to 4200 m/s and it also performs a gentle re-entry. In fact the shuttle itself could be used as the upper stage of such a scheme. It would just have to be better boosted so that it would not use all its fuel on the way up. Based on the 450 Isp the shuttle is almost an SSTO. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"zoltan" wrote in news:1131690394.686827.14560
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: For starters I imagine that I already have finished the flying car. This is a composit four seater vertical takeoff airplane/car that weighs about a ton fully fuelled with four passengers. It uses air breathing ramjet-like engines that allow it to hover and to takeoff and land vertically as well as fly horizontally. How do you get a ramjet to work at all? What do you mean by 'ramjet-like? --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() zoltan wrote: Based on the 450 Isp the shuttle is almost an SSTO. Almost, but not quite. Your SSME Isp is in a vacuum, not at launch. http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/...opul/SSME.html http://www.spaceandtech.com/spacedat...me_specs.shtml We just need to get rid of the orbiter and SRBs, and build a better ET, er ... IT. http://webpages.charter.net/cosmic http://webpages.charter.net/tsiolkovky http://webpages.charter.net/tsiolkovsky/rocket.htm |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been working on the development of these engines that use a
venturi effect to drive the intake air into a ramjet like structure. The fuel regeneratively cools the combustion chamber and nozzle walls and it is then injected into the intake where it pumps air into the engine that subsequently provides the oxiizer for the burning. I get about 4000 static Isp with high thrust to weight. I am working on a prototype flying car using these induction jet engines. I have developed the fly by light control system and I am working on integrating a prototype. I am contemplating using the induction jet engines as booster engines where they would save money by working as rocket engines higher up, out of the atmosphere. This would be accomplished by oxidizer injection higher up where there is not enough air. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In this post I was actually contemplating boosting the shuttle to a
4200 m/s velocity before the SSMEs ignite. They would ignite in space. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uh, right, sure, uh-huh.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Damon Hill wrote: How do you get a ramjet to work at all? First, rockets are used to bring the car up to ramjet ignition speed: http://image.www.rakuten.co.jp/miket...271653560.jpeg :-) Pat |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() zoltan wrote: I have been working on the development of these engines that use a venturi effect to drive the intake air into a ramjet like structure. The fuel regeneratively cools the combustion chamber and nozzle walls and it is then injected into the intake where it pumps air into the engine that subsequently provides the oxiizer for the burning. This sounds like one of these: http://www.vortechonline.com/jets/ http://www.vortechonline.com/jets/gallery/ Pat |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess the points I was trying to make were the following:
1. An SSTO is not hard to build, in fact the shuttle is an SSTO. You can make a rocket with a delta-V of 8400 m/s using a SSME and a mass ratio of 7. 2. It makes a lot more sense to build the TSTO that I described, because BOTH stages return to Earth at a mild 4200 m/s velocity, simplifying the structures and reducing the risks. Both can be reused by simply refuelling them. 3. Air breathing engines can be used for first stage boost as well as hover or vertical landing. They are light and cheap, they can be easily made and have very high Isp values. You can build the booster of the TSTO using an air breathing induction jet engine and a mass fraction of 4 using hydrocarbon fuel with LOX. It can even come back perform a hover and a vertical landing. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() zoltan wrote: I guess the points I was trying to make were the following: 1. An SSTO is not hard to build, in fact the shuttle is an SSTO. No it is not. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laser beam and TSTO | Rémy MERCIER | Space Science Misc | 0 | August 3rd 05 01:57 PM |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Astronomy Misc | 422 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Policy | 437 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
TSTO Article at Wikipedia | Mike Ackerman | Policy | 14 | March 12th 04 06:44 AM |
Recommended TSTO technical papers? | WvB | Technology | 14 | September 4th 03 06:00 AM |